chrislatimer
Banned
Posts: 3,482
Joined: Jan 2009
|
RE: BS XTREME Screenshots
might be worth asking babestation for a free pin for a night see if it got better.
|
|
16-04-2010 17:16 |
|
skateguy
Posting Machine
Posts: 8,776
Joined: Jul 2008
Reputation: 477
|
RE: BS XTREME Screenshots
(16-04-2010 16:44 )vila Wrote: When I think of 'Babestation girls' I think of Paige, Lori, Ella, Georgie, Stevie, Cleo, Tammy, Charlie O, Rosie et al. It's them I want to see going a bit further than they are currently allowed to do on the free-to-air channels.
But of course, this was never going to happen. Anyone who believed that Babestation's glamour & topless-only models were suddenly going to start doing nude or open leg work on TV, merely because Babestation launched a 'harder' channel, is incredibly naive.
Its blatantly obvious who is likely to appear on BS Xtreme and who isn't. Babestation have a reasonable-sized roster of girls who used to appear on Sexstation, as well as those who appear on the SS webstream to populate their new show. Quite naturally these girls generally don't appeal to fans of Babestion's glamour-style girls, so a significant percentage of the BS audience is not, and never was going to be interested in BS Xtreme.
.
|
|
.
(This post was last modified: 16-04-2010 17:28 by skateguy.)
|
|
16-04-2010 17:27 |
|
Rogerbee
Gone
Posts: 2,090
Joined: Apr 2010
|
RE: Babestation XTREME
Yep, £10 is crossed out at the moment, but may not be later. Hopefully RBS won't become Rescue Babe Station!
CHEERS!
|
|
16-04-2010 17:40 |
|
Rogerbee
Gone
Posts: 2,090
Joined: Apr 2010
|
RE: Babestation XTREME
You know, we may as well not bother posting here if we're not going to watch it. Nothing will change, so, let's get back to supporting the girls and content we can see and make the most of it while we still have it.
CHEERS!
|
|
16-04-2010 18:05 |
|
tommy47
Newbie
Posts: 3
Joined: Sep 2009
Reputation: 0
|
RE: Babestation XTREME
Don't waste your money, cobbled together short videos with corny fake ooohs and aaaaahs dodgy camera work in fact quite miss able.
I see its £5 a night to view now not the £10 as first announced, £1 per month might get a handful of viewers.
|
|
16-04-2010 18:34 |
|