mr mystery
Account closed by request
Posts: 5,798
Joined: Sep 2009
|
RE: Babestation XTREME
I just wonder in the next few weeks if not many people bother paying £ 5.00 for the encrypted show, and are instead content to watch their favorite girls naked with the occasional slips on the free shows (as some people have stated on this forum) that Cellcast really tame the shows down , i can just see the on screen caption saying " if you want to see our girls naked and going further pay a fiver and watch tonight ", after all freeview people would have no option , they would have to put up with a tame show or spend a fiver , us sky viewer can just switch over to another channel , Cellcast may take a gamble on loosing some sky viewers if this was the case in order to make more money out of the freeview people .
Life is short . Break the rules, Forgive quickly, Kiss slowly, Love truly, Laugh uncontrollably, and never regret anything that made you smile .
|
|
17-04-2010 15:04 |
|
babestation
Since 2002
Posts: 3,397
Joined: Mar 2010
Reputation: 40
|
RE: Babestation XTREME
(17-04-2010 15:01 )Deb x Wrote: (17-04-2010 14:48 )babestation Wrote: I didn't say the £5 was permanent, again just people speculating and others believing everything they read on here, apart from if it comes from me.. but what do i know hey
You said the £5 would be standard (from the second night onwards). Just so it's clear, by 'standard' do you mean 'temporary', then?
it is £5 at the moment, but £10 is the official price
again.. on the website it says 'Special Introductory Offer! Watch Babestation Xtreme for just £5 tonight!' .. so why are we arguing about what the price in the future might be?
when it's no longer £5, the site will reflect that
http://www.babestationcams.com - Your favourite Babestation girls in hot daily cam shows!
http://www.babestation.tv - 180+ Girls, 50,000+ Pictures, 200+ Videos
Connect with Babestation! Twitter | Instagram
|
|
17-04-2010 15:10 |
|
Deb x
Master Poster
Posts: 888
Joined: Feb 2009
Reputation: 72
|
RE: Babestation XTREME
(17-04-2010 15:10 )babestation Wrote: (17-04-2010 15:01 )Deb x Wrote: You said the £5 would be standard (from the second night onwards). Just so it's clear, by 'standard' do you mean 'temporary', then?
it is £5 at the moment, but £10 is the official price
again.. on the website it says 'Special Introductory Offer! Watch Babestation Xtreme for just £5 tonight!' .. so why are we arguing about what the price in the future might be?
when it's no longer £5, the site will reflect that
I'm not arguing, I just wanted clarification. I misunderstood your statement when you said that "From the second night onwards, the standard charge will be £5"
I assumed by 'standard' you meant £5 was going to be the normal, 'official' price (for the forseeable future, anyway; I understand rises may occur in time). My bad.
Thank you for your answer, anyway. Things are slightly clearer now, I think. The standard price and the official price are two different things
(This post was last modified: 17-04-2010 15:31 by Deb x.)
|
|
17-04-2010 15:22 |
|
Sooky™
The Rack Attack!!
Posts: 9,745
Joined: Apr 2009
Reputation: 217
|
RE: Babestation XTREME
(17-04-2010 15:10 )babestation Wrote: so why are we arguing about what the price in the future might be?
Because you took umbridge to people commenting on the official full price of £10 when debating on hypothetical situations in regards to the channels long term future.
(17-04-2010 15:10 )babestation Wrote: I didn't say the £5 was permanent, again just people speculating and others believing everything they read on here, apart from if it comes from me.. but what do i know hey
By your own admission.....not as much as you'd like us to think http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.ph...#pid490782
The point is - you can't make an issue yourself about the price, then get all snippy with people because the debate doesn't go the way you want it to. The simple fact is....the channel costs £10. The fact that it is currently, for an introductory temporary period of time, only £5 is irrelevent in the context of debating this channel. Basic business sense dictates this. You would not base a business plan on a trial price, but rather the prospective revenue generated by your products actual cost.
If you choose to set yourself up as a 'helpful' presence on the forum answering peoples enquiries or requests of clarification on issues, then you have to be prepared for what that entails - and this may mean repetition or answering points you don't deem valid. If you're unprepared to do so, then nobody is forcing you to respond. To quote 'ar Graham'...."the decision is yours"
|
|
17-04-2010 17:17 |
|
Sooky™
The Rack Attack!!
Posts: 9,745
Joined: Apr 2009
Reputation: 217
|
RE: Babestation XTREME
(17-04-2010 13:56 )admiral decker Wrote: (17-04-2010 12:21 )Sooky Wrote: Am I the only one who actually sees the benefit to the average punter if this channel was to fail?
Yes you are the only one.
Thanks for answering on behalf of everyone on the forum - now I know
(17-04-2010 13:56 )admiral decker Wrote: When Ofcom wanted all the babe channels to encrypt all their broadcasts what did they do? They hired lawyers to fight Ofcom and make every effort to stay free to air - what does that tell you?
You don't fancy informing the anti-ofcom brigade this do you?
However, the channels are a whole new breed nowadays than they were even a year ago.....with many changes in regards to those running the channels etc - so who knows what the future brings
|
|
17-04-2010 17:21 |
|
vila
Viewers' Champion
Posts: 3,588
Joined: Feb 2009
Reputation: 51
|
RE: Babestation XTREME
(17-04-2010 15:10 )babestation Wrote: (17-04-2010 15:01 )Deb x Wrote: (17-04-2010 14:48 )babestation Wrote: I didn't say the £5 was permanent, again just people speculating and others believing everything they read on here, apart from if it comes from me.. but what do i know hey
You said the £5 would be standard (from the second night onwards). Just so it's clear, by 'standard' do you mean 'temporary', then?
it is £5 at the moment, but £10 is the official price
again.. on the website it says 'Special Introductory Offer! Watch Babestation Xtreme for just £5 tonight!' .. so why are we arguing about what the price in the future might be?
when it's no longer £5, the site will reflect that
YOU are causing all the argument by saying things like this:
(16-04-2010 21:49 )babestation Wrote: (16-04-2010 17:30 )vila Wrote: I notice there was no response to this from 'babestation', so presumably the normal cost IS £10 after all.
didn't realise we had to reply to respond to this... our official site clearly states the price for tonight...
Our official Babestation Xtreme website states that the price is £5.. the price is £5.
don't believe all the speculation, go on http://www.babestationxtreme.com (the OFFICIAL site) to see how much the channel is tonight
By saying that the price on the OFFICIAL Babestation Xtreme website is £5, you are effectively stating that to be the OFFICIAL price, but you now say the OFFICIAL price is £10.
When I said the NORMAL price was £10 wtf did you think I meant, other than the OFFICIAL price??? And why bat on about "the price for tonight" when I made no mention of a price for that night?
(16-04-2010 21:51 )chrislatimer Wrote: i gotta say some of the stuff you reply to is quite stupid, not on your part, but on the part of the person posting.
I think it's plain from what has followed that there was nothing at all "stupid" about my post.
(17-04-2010 13:07 )asti316 Wrote: Does any1 else feel sorry for the people that watch normal Babestation, praying for the babes to slip out of their underwear when it's all on show on another channel?
No - because, as anyone can see from a multitude of posts on here, it isn't!
(17-04-2010 16:12 )misterG Wrote: (17-04-2010 15:04 )mr mystery Wrote: screen caption saying " if you want to see our girls naked and going further pay a fiver and watch tonight
I'm sure one of the onscreen adverts actually says something along the lines of 'talk to the girls and direct the action' too...
despite the reality of no girls and no phone lines...
Yes, indeed it does.
|
|
17-04-2010 17:29 |
|