jimmyt73
Lola Knight fan
Posts: 5,402
Joined: Oct 2010
Reputation: 84
|
RE: Studio 66 - Can it get any worse?
Sad to say its not exactly been memorable tonight,what with only having two babes on again tonight and seemingly only one camera operator,both the babes on tonight are normally excellent but the lack of staff both in front and behind the camera is alarming,although its not as bad as the legendary"Black Wednesday" was its not much better,i would also suggest you need four babes for three chanels and at least two camera persons,also an on call back up babe list,so that when a babe is taken ill or whatever adequate cover is available because not only does it look bad to have more channels than babes to appear on them,it will enevitably result in lost revenue,i mean i have nothing against Amy but she is unlikely to generate the same revenue as Lucy,Lilly or Clare Richards if they had been available tonight,in summary its starting to look like Bluebird did near the end and no amount of talent,new or otherwise may be enough to prevent it from going,possibly sooner rather than later.
im always open to positive change
|
|
23-05-2014 00:36 |
|
Rammyrascal
Team Thicc
Posts: 102,778
Joined: Apr 2009
Reputation: 251
|
RE: Studio 66 - Can it get any worse?
(23-05-2014 00:36 )jimmyt73 Wrote: Sad to say its not exactly been memorable tonight,what with only having two babes on again tonight and seemingly only one camera operator,both the babes on tonight are normally excellent but the lack of staff both in front and behind the camera is alarming,although its not as bad as the legendary"Black Wednesday" was its not much better,i would also suggest you need four babes for three chanels and at least two camera persons,also an on call back up babe list,so that when a babe is taken ill or whatever adequate cover is available because not only does it look bad to have more channels than babes to appear on them,it will enevitably result in lost revenue,i mean i have nothing against Amy but she is unlikely to generate the same revenue as Lucy,Lilly or Clare Richards if they had been available tonight,in summary its starting to look like Bluebird did near the end and no amount of talent,new or otherwise may be enough to prevent it from going,possibly sooner rather than later.
agree with you jimmy regarding how many babes 66 should have on each night. ive always said with the babeshows you need one more babe than the number of channels you have. so with s66 that number is 4, 1 babe on each channel and 1 babe on break. having a cover/back up list is good idea as well and s66 should do this if they haven't done so. saying that though s66 probably thought lucy was going to be on tonight, especially when she so told the cover babe (if they had one) that she wasn't needed tonight and by the time it came clear lucy wasn't well enough to be on, it was too late to bring in a cover babe
regarding amy-louise, yes it's unlikely she won't generate the same amount of revenue as clare Richards, lucy or lilly because it's only her 2nd nightshow tonight and clare etc have done nights for years and will have a bigger fanbase than amy-louise. think amy-louise will generate this amount of revenue in time once she has been on nights as long as clare etc have.
wouldn't say s66 is going the way of bluebird just yet myself, especially because they are adding new nightbabes finally to the night roster (3 this month alone have made their s66 nights debut)
for me s66 just needs to add some more nightbabes and use all the sets they have including the likes of the bathtub/hotub and shower and not just been on beds all the time. if they do this then they will get back to their best asap
a member of the Piper Niven Cult
|
|
23-05-2014 01:00 |
|