MrGrumpyPants Wrote:Censorship :-( Wrote:I haven't seen last night’s show in detail but, from the few bits I did see, it seemed rather subdued. If that is the case, it reinforces my theory that the presence of daytime babes causes the regular, night time babes to tone down their performances, presumably, as instructed. Given that BS is very tame to begin with, clearly, that is not a good thing. If this is happening, then, personally, I would prefer that daytime babes stay on daytime.
Don't get me wrong, I have no problem with any babe doing as little (or as much ) as she is willing to do; its entirely her decision. And if their presence is not to blame for the (even more) subdued output of recent nights, then no problem, but it’s not looking too promising, IMO.
BTW, PL looked much better last night, inspite of a rather nervous cameraman trying to spoil the fun, as well as the HUGE amount of split screen, which also spoils things, IMO.
Next thng you will be saying that the day girls are responsible for Global Warming the banking Crisis and the rise in Islamic Fundamentalism !!!
lets get thing one thing straight im sure the night girls can think and fight for themselves
Did the presence of paige the other night tone amanda down NO !!!!! we need to stop saying daygirls bad night time girls good there must be a reason why they arnt and id look to the people behind the cameras !!!!
turn attention to them because they have all the control !!!
I was forming a theory that the presence of daytime babes MIGHT be making the show even more tame than usual. This was based upon viewing recent shows; specifically, 2 shows that had daytime babes, which, IMO, were more tame than normal, and two other shows, one before, and one after the 2 'daytime presence' shows, which were 'normally tame', hence my theorising that there may be a connection; hardly a statistically significant sample, but, it made me wonder. I did not, however, make a statement of fact that there was a connection.
The last time I saw Amanda, which was her final appearance before a (12 day?) break, she was MUCH more subdued than her previous appearance, IMO, but I can’t remember if there was a daytime presence or not, so I don’t know if it lends support to, or detracts from, my theory.
I did not blame the daytime babes personally, and made clear, or so I thought, that, as ever, it is Cellcast that is to blame, if there is any connection, which is why I said ‘…presumably, as instructed’.
I did not blame the daytime babes for the generally poor standard of BS overall, and if you look through my earlier posts, you can see that I have been critical of the channel since day one, for its poor/tame output, IMO, and it is only in the last few days that I started to think about whether or not the presence of daytime was making things worse.
You say that ‘the night girls can think and fight for themselves’; I did not say, nor imply, that they were doing this, if indeed they are, because of their own, personal choice; as stated, I blame Cellcast, If there is a problem, in which case, why would the night time babes choose to ignore an instruction of this type, any more than they would all the other instructions they seem to receive, e.g those that stop them from doing certain content that they have done in the past (PG), on any night?
Anyway, as I have already stated, I was just wondering about it – didn’t mean to start WWIII.