Ultimate Babe 2018 (last 8)

I'm sorry if that above observation tees some contributors off. Just my perception of things, as someone who has found XXXpanded quite amazing this year (and in 2017, when Kim Jones was probably my favourite babe of the year!).

I guess I shouldn't moan too loudly given that I actually missed the opening round due to not checking on here in time!

1.Alice Goodwin
2.Scarlett Jones
3.Nicole Snow
4. Sophie Hart
5. Ashley Emma
6. Alice Goodwin
7. Lola Knight
8. Clare Richards

Alice Goodwin
Scarlett Jones
Atlanta
Lola
Clare Richards
Ashley
Nicole Snow
Sophie Hart

Ashley
Alice Goodwin
Sophie Hart
Clare Richards
Nicole Snow
Lola
Atlanta
Scarlett Jones

(04-12-2018 10:15 )CatyColeClub Wrote:  Out of curiosity, what happens to the points when a voter doesn't submit a full list of nominations? Seems like an attempt to skew results to benefit their favourite girls?

This is a really good point that needs clarifying. Doesn't the lack of a full list of 8 names in order of preference corrupt the result? It shouldn't matter if you're not fond of a particular girl/girls - they would still get your lowest scores. Cherry picking girls that you like ONLY really makes the whole thing a bit of a farce. Perhaps, Winsaw, that needs to be absolutely, and clearly, stressed. Otherwise the competition is pretty irrelevant.

Same applies to the Ultimate Day Babe thread.

Ashley Emma
Alice Goodwin
Nicole Snow
Clare Richards
Sophie Hart
Atlanta
Scarlett Jones
Lola

… not my ideal list but hey ho

It's a fair point (I only went with one babe too, as I think she's been head & shoulders the best this year). Maybe it should've been stressed that you have to order all 8 whether you like them or not.

But there's the flaw, someone will only like one or two girls but someone who they don't care for will be only be randomly graded a point lower than their favourite. Still think the head to head rounds sorted that problem better, you could skip a head to head of two babes you don't like without corruption, but then there's a flaw to be found in whatever system is used.

(04-12-2018 10:15 )CatyColeClub Wrote:  Out of curiosity, what happens to the points when a voter doesn't submit a full list of nominations? Seems like an attempt to skew results to benefit their favourite girls?

There is a possible mathematical solution to allocate proportional points but I shan't bore everyone with it .
Unless I have to

(05-12-2018 13:13 )snookered Wrote:  

(04-12-2018 10:15 )CatyColeClub Wrote:  Out of curiosity, what happens to the points when a voter doesn't submit a full list of nominations? Seems like an attempt to skew results to benefit their favourite girls?

There is a possible mathematical solution to allocate proportional points but I shan't bore everyone with it .
Unless I have to

Go for it, as long as you don’t do it in the style of a boring lecturer who rambles on and on talking utter gibberish which no one understands

(05-12-2018 13:31 )Carl43a Wrote:  

(05-12-2018 13:13 )snookered Wrote:  

(04-12-2018 10:15 )CatyColeClub Wrote:  Out of curiosity, what happens to the points when a voter doesn't submit a full list of nominations? Seems like an attempt to skew results to benefit their favourite girls?

There is a possible mathematical solution to allocate proportional points but I shan't bore everyone with it .
Unless I have to

Go for it, as long as you don’t do it in the style of a boring lecturer who rambles on and on talking utter gibberish which no one understands

Oh well I am f#cked then
Seriously though...... out of respect to winsaw I will leave it to him to clarify his way forward.
If he wants to use the idea I have that is his call.
But as he is the tournament organiser the final decision is his.