Adult broadcaster fined £90k by Ofcom

Fair enough, mrmann, but I'm not about to plough through every thread of the girls you mentioned looking for examples. I just wondered if anyone knew of any caps/clips they could link directly to.

(28-06-2011 15:05 )StanTheMan Wrote:  Fair enough, mrmann, but I'm not about to plough through every thread of the girls you mentioned looking for examples. I just wondered if anyone knew of any caps/clips they could link directly to.

Just check out Amanda or Stevie's BS caps and vids sections .

Or Karina, Jada, Camilla (A while back), even Georgie and Tiffany.

Here's a little cap of Stevie, and page 13 of her vids thread is a good example, not including the full on strip show though, as she only did that when the cameraman was away

http://www.imagebam.com/image/fb7414120053041

Up until recently, that pose was quite common, but how many times do we see that same position on Elite, Red Light, or even the secret channel for that matter? Almost never! Babestation is the only channel that still does that position, especially on a regular basis.

They've tamed things lately though.

Here's Georgie, second vid down: http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.ph...25&page=30

This position is one of the only reasons why I still watch Babestation, as well as the standing up naked position.

(24-06-2011 22:32 )SYBORG666 Wrote:  

(24-06-2011 22:15 )kalel76 Wrote:  I wonder who's next on ofcom's hit list.

Most likely Redlight or Storm knowing Ofcom because they always go for the easy target.

Whilst not wishing the wrath of the regulator on any of the babechannels the two fore runners are

RLC

http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.ph...4&page=124

Elite TV

http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.ph...#pid852444

Naked shows are still present on the channels so the broadcasters haven't fully relented.

(28-06-2011 15:27 )mrmann Wrote:  Here's a little cap of Stevie, and page 13 of her vids thread is a good example, not including the full on strip show though, as she only did that when the cameraman was away

Stevie doesn't appear to have a vids thread. I found her chat, discussion and pics thread, but there was nothing on page 13 except a photoshoot, which doesn't count.

(28-06-2011 23:49 )StanTheMan Wrote:  Stevie doesn't appear to have a vids thread.

http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.ph...31&page=13

(24-06-2011 23:48 )eccles Wrote:  Serves the idiots right.

Sport are/were a major player and knew the rules, but they handed complete control to a third party knowing ...

Just to be clear, while I think SEL should have known better, the fine in out of all proportion. It represents about 2 peoples wages for a year, staff years always being a good yardstick. The offences were only repeated in the sense that they happended multiple times when the broadcaster was not aware they were breaking the rules or legally unable to prevent it - not the same thing as receiving a warning and repeating the offence. As for saying the offence occurred 10 times to the fine should be 10 time the fine for one offence, thats not how it works in any other system. Multiple offences usually attract lower multipliers, otherwise the court or regulator soon runs out of sentencing options. At that rate just being unable to supply recordings for 25 days would attract the maximum fine, so if it happened for 2 months before being spotted the fine would be exactly the same as for 60 days.

Be interesting to see if they apply the same logic to the BBC which has a track record of broadcasting live F words from music festivals during daytime TV when kids and vicars wifes may be watching. Oh no, forgot, those get marked Resolved after a few pink gins at The Garrick.

(28-06-2011 23:55 )skateguy Wrote:  

(28-06-2011 23:49 )StanTheMan Wrote:  Stevie doesn't appear to have a vids thread.

http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.ph...31&page=13

Granted, the pussy oops from this clip is very nice, but if Cellcast have special licence to show harder material, why does the cameraman panic so much at 1:35 when he notices how much she's showing?

(29-06-2011 20:27 )StanTheMan Wrote:  Granted, the pussy oops from this clip is very nice, but if Cellcast have special licence to show harder material, why does the cameraman panic so much at 1:35 when he notices how much she's showing?

I said to ignore this one, because she seemed to be doing this when the cameraman was away. Check out the other vids of the women I mentioned to see examples. Karina and Jada did this position almost every night, without the cameraman flinching, though it was the on the back position, legs open. Others have and still do as well, though they've tamed things in the past week, probably because they know Ofcom is on to them.

Guys - what are you doing? Surely we all have said in the past that highlighting these instances only serves to aggravate the situation - it can't hurt Sport now but I don't think it is fair to the girls or the channels to do Ofcoms work for them.

I'm sorry if this seems like criticism and I know the info is already there but.......