Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 42 Vote(s) - 2.76 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Ofcom Discussion

Author Message
StanTheMan Offline
Banned

Posts: 3,790
Joined: May 2009
Post: #771
RE: So how many people have erased those useless ofcom mandated bookends
(21-07-2011 23:37 )eccles Wrote:  Does anyone think babe channels should be opt in? Meaning they should be pin protected or hidden in brand new boxes, but can be unprotected as a block or unhidden?

I refer you to my last post. It won't make a scrap of difference while Ofcom are in control.
21-07-2011 23:48
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
mr anonymous Offline
Senior Poster
***

Posts: 108
Joined: May 2011
Reputation: 6
Post: #772
RE: How many people have erased those useless ofcom mandated bookends
In my opinion it would be better for ALL freeview set top box makers to be forced to implement a new system.

The system should be when new boxes are turned on for the first time the first thing it does is ask you to set up an adult pin, this pin should only be able to be changed by person who set pin up. Then when the channels are first accessed in any given day its asks for this pin once that night.

Eventually old boxes would be replaced or brake then as people get new equipment they can not stumble upon these channels by accident.

I really can't understand why something like that was not done from that start. The current bookend system is a waste of time IMO.
(This post was last modified: 22-07-2011 00:21 by mr anonymous.)
22-07-2011 00:20
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
eccles Offline
custodes qui custodiet
*****

Posts: 3,032
Joined: May 2010
Reputation: 69
Post: #773
RE: How many people have erased those useless ofcom mandated bookends
You posted after I started writing and before I hit submit.

Agree with the sentiment though, its almost as if they want the channels to cause offence.

Ofcom might not give a flying jizz, but Id like to be a fly on the wall when they have to explain to The Daily Mail and Keith Vaz that low cost easy solutions were suggested and they turned them down flat.

Gone fishing
22-07-2011 00:21
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
mr anonymous Offline
Senior Poster
***

Posts: 108
Joined: May 2011
Reputation: 6
Post: #774
RE: How many people have erased those useless ofcom mandated bookends
Would have been a better way of going about it, the only other way to do it is to MHEG protect the channels like xtreame is and give the codes out for free but some boxes dont support the xtreme MHEG app so then some people may not see the channels.

So I really think the first suggestion posted is the right way of going about it certainly not those bookends anyway.

Its not exactly a book anyway so I wonder why ofcom called them bookends surley there channel ends.BounceBounce
(This post was last modified: 22-07-2011 00:28 by mr anonymous.)
22-07-2011 00:27
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Roquentin Offline
Master Poster
****

Posts: 951
Joined: Jun 2009
Reputation: 47
Post: #775
RE: So how many people have erased those useless ofcom mandated bookends
(21-07-2011 23:37 )eccles Wrote:  Talking of which, time and again Ofcom argues that people can see the channels by accident, and some parents dont know the channels exist so they cant exercise parental control.

Does anyone think babe channels should be opt in? Meaning they should be pin protected or hidden in brand new boxes, but can be unprotected as a block or unhidden?

I think we are snookered (err sorry snookered! if youre watching) Despite alot of attacks on Ofcom's arguments in this section, the lax/luddite parent point is strong enough. 11 year old boys will want to see the channels. I cant see Ofcom going away.

But I've suggested elsewhere, an opt in system (one off pin, whatever) would cut punter numbers finding (and developing a taste for) the babechannels in the first place (by channel hopping). I think limiting that would hurt revenues for the channels more than the extra regulations will do.

I think these two points are actually logically connected. The channels need to be easily accessible to survive, but its because they are easily accessible that Ofcom/government feel the need to regulate. Its a bit of a catch 22.
(This post was last modified: 22-07-2011 00:35 by Roquentin.)
22-07-2011 00:27
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
eccles Offline
custodes qui custodiet
*****

Posts: 3,032
Joined: May 2010
Reputation: 69
Post: #776
RE: How many people have erased those useless ofcom mandated bookends
Ofcom gives evidence to the Daily Mail Select Committee

[Image: murdochcommittee1950663.jpg]

(22-07-2011 00:21 )eccles Wrote:  Ofcom might not give a flying jizz, but Id like to be a fly on the wall when they have to explain to The Daily Mail and Keith Vaz that low cost easy solutions were suggested and they turned them down flat.

Gone fishing
(This post was last modified: 22-07-2011 01:14 by eccles.)
22-07-2011 01:13
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
eccles Offline
custodes qui custodiet
*****

Posts: 3,032
Joined: May 2010
Reputation: 69
Post: #777
RE: Ofcom Discussion
The whole context argument misses the point. 15 year old boys are thick. we know that. Its a proven psychological fact that their brains are in flux and they cannot read other people emotions properly. The idea that they can recognise let alone understand a subtle literary context would have an English teacher wetting themselves with laughter.

That just leaves adults, who can read the EPG and use the Off button.

Gone fishing
22-07-2011 01:17
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
schmoo Away
Master Poster
****

Posts: 845
Joined: Feb 2009
Reputation: 28
Post: #778
Tackling Ofcom - defending our channels
Before i begin.. i have started a new thread because it's a slightly different Ofcom topic where i didn't want it lost in any of the other threads. Hope that's okay.


Right.. with all the comments on this forum about other TV channels "getting away" with showing sexual content of varying natures etc and members' moaning about these channels not getting brought to account whilst our babe channels don't, may i suggest something..?

Can a complaint not be submitted to Ofcom against these other channels, when we are aware of them, by us - the viewers of the babe channels?

Then, we can specifically state that we are disgusted, that we/our children were specifically not watching channels in the adult EPG and saw such material etc etc or for any such valid other reason we can think of.

Furthermore, we can, even should, state that we do watch the babe channels and are happy to see such material in this respect as we are choosing to watch it, whereas watching on non adult channels, we are not.

Then, not only have we brought about a serious complaint which we stress to Ofcom they must investigate, and apply the same draconian rules they currently do in respect of the babe channels, but we are always stressing that we want such material to be available when, and if we choose, to watch it.

Therefore, we are indirectly getting our point across to Ofcom in a way they cannot refuse to listen to. Rather than the head on approach that we all know gets us nowhere. The producers could, and bloody should, also get involved in this.

You may think i'm jesting, but i'm not, it's a serious suggestion.
(This post was last modified: 01-08-2011 11:56 by schmoo.)
01-08-2011 11:56
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
continental 19 Offline
Newbie

Posts: 1
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation: 0
Post: #779
RE: Tackling Ofcom - defending our channels
Smile I think thats a great idea you're the first person who has come up with an idea like it. I agree with you though, all i keep seeing on this forum is people moaning and groaning, i think it's about time we made this happen. I'm up for it, and if you want someone to tag along with you just let me no the more the merrier, we need to do something and the time is now.
01-08-2011 19:12
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
SYBORG666 Offline
Spawn Of Satan
*****

Posts: 1,762
Joined: Oct 2010
Reputation: 54
Post: #780
RE: Tackling Ofcom - defending our channels
I also think it's a great idea. The biggest problem though, is trying to find producers with a backbone because they all seem happy with getting shafted by Ofcom due to the fact they don't seem to be doing fuck all about it. I mean, all the producers need to do (in my opinion) is put the rivalry aside and take Ofcom on together because if the big 4 companies took on Ofcom together, then I genuinely beleive that they would then be able to do shows that we all want to see and they would probably double their annual revenue. So it would become a win win situation, we get to see stronger material and the channels would make even more money.

Raising Hell Since 1980.

As a man once said:
"Control yourself, your better alone"
"Control yourself, see who gives a fuck"
(This post was last modified: 01-08-2011 19:53 by SYBORG666.)
01-08-2011 19:52
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply