Lucy Summers - Discussion (Non-Babeshow)

Moralistic finger pointing on a wank channel forum. Priceless

It's not about sympathy or support. It's about a girl who made a bad mistake, admitted it, will pay the price and then move on with her life. Which will hopefully mean more great performances from one of best on the babe channels.

End of.

(28-01-2012 00:39 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  yeah would be best for lucy to keep her head down for a while, at least till she knows what sentence she's getting

This is true Rammy, but if she wants to keep paying the money back, she's going to have to work.

(28-01-2012 00:57 )KerrAvon Wrote:  Moralistic finger pointing on a wank channel forum. Priceless

It's not about sympathy or support. It's about a girl who made a bad mistake, admitted it, will pay the price and then move on with her life. Which will hopefully mean more great performances from one of best on the babe channels.

End of.

What is that comment I've bolded supposed to mean exactly?

and the basis of what he was saying is that he knew something we didn't, if we are being misinformed why can't he or Lucy tell us here, is that hard to do? Usually if you see people uninformed on the situation, you would, you know? inform them?

(27-01-2012 23:18 )SeanTheDon Wrote:  And you are all little fucking angels ain't you?

yes i often claim 15,000 pounds in benefits aswell as earning hundreds of pounds a week wanking people off on the phone.stop letting your penis talk for you

(28-01-2012 01:04 )Kellys Heroes Wrote:  This is true Rammy, but if she wants to keep paying the money back, she's going to have to work.

that is also true, but still think best for now for lucy to just keep her head down

Rammy if Lucy needs to pay back the money she will to work if she didnt work she might not be able to pay it back

Its simple enough really,she owes the money so she'll have to work to pay it back,kinda makes sense that she's recently started doing boy/girl on the webcam,perfect timing she'd have 16k payed back in no time the way her arse moves as for calling her this and that,im more on the side of fuck um....if it wasn't her it would be some prick in a suit and no we wouldnt be reading about it in the papers am i saying she should get off with it no im not,one thing i will say is maybe she was abit naive to think she could be claiming that much when she's on tele every second night lol the lads who work in the welfare office watch the 900 channels too,there she is signing on and the guy behind the counter is like im sure ive seen her somewhere before i see a great plot line for a hardcore porn in all this,she'll make a mint off it

Benefit fraud always raises the hackles with many people and rightly so, it's our money and I'm not going to condone what Lucy did for one second, especially given the amount of money involved.

However, whilst it is easy to smugly sit in judgement, if you had got pregnant at 16 like Lucy did, and if you have not had the chances, opportunities or education that some of us have been fortunate to have, I could at least have some comprehension of why people do such things. I grew up in a council house with an outside toilet in a very dubious area and I can easily see how my life could have taken a very different path.

It costs around £3,900 a month to keep somebody in prison and we really have to ask ourselves if that would be an appropriate way of dealing with this matter. When it comes to punishing people we often confuse justice with vengence, and whilst locking her up might "send a message to others" it is going to cost us far more money to incarcerate her than letting her pay back what she owes, and for what purpose? To destroy a young life and possibly a family? She didn't beat up an old lady or break into your home.

We've all seen cases in our local papers where some crook with a record as long as their arm has walked free from court with a fine that they're not going to pay and a community service order that they're not going to fulfil, let alone the number of MPs who were allowed to pay back their fiddled expenses with no further action taken or the multi-nationals who've done cosy tax deals with the Inland Revenue that's saved them billions etc, etc, etc

Only last week there was a story in the media about a gang of thugs who beat a man senseless and left him for dead, laughing and punching the air as they left court with a suspended sentence. One of even even boasted that he had "got away with GBH" (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/c...-dead.html ) yet a woman juror who looked up a defendant on the internet was jailed for six months for "contempt of court".

Sadly, the justice system is full of the great and good who like lording it over the rest of us and the official sentencing guidelines (http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/s_to_u/sente...fit_fraud/ ) suggest that Lucy will be very lucky indeed to avoid jail. Only my twopennerthworth, but that would not just be inappropriate, it would be wrong.

(28-01-2012 00:57 )KerrAvon Wrote:  Moralistic finger pointing on a wank channel forum. Priceless

What an idiotic statement, Am I doing something wrong watching these channels? I wasn't aware that they were illegal.

I guess that your an ofcom supporter then, I bet they think those of us that watch these channels lack morals

(28-01-2012 06:35 )mr williams Wrote:  Benefit fraud always raises the hackles with many people and rightly so, it's our money and I'm not going to condone what Lucy did for one second, especially given the amount of money involved.

However, whilst it is easy to smugly sit in judgement, if you had got pregnant at 16 like Lucy did, and if you have not had the chances, opportunities or education that some of us have been fortunate to have, I could at least have some comprehension of why people do such things. I grew up in a council house with an outside toilet in a very dubious area and I can easily see how my life could have taken a very different path.

It costs around £3,900 a month to keep somebody in prison and we really have to ask ourselves if that would be an appropriate way of dealing with this matter. When it comes to punishing people we often confuse justice with vengence, and whilst locking her up might "send a message to others" it is going to cost us far more money to incarcerate her than letting her pay back what she owes, and for what purpose? To destroy a young life and possibly a family? She didn't beat up an old lady or break into your home.

We've all seen cases in our local papers where some crook with a record as long as their arm has walked free from court with a fine that they're not going to pay and a community service order that they're not going to fulfil, let alone the number of MPs who were allowed to pay back their fiddled expenses with no further action taken or the multi-nationals who've done cosy tax deals with the Inland Revenue that's saved them billions etc, etc, etc

Only last week there was a story in the media about a gang of thugs who beat a man senseless and left him for dead, laughing and punching the air as they left court with a suspended sentence. One of even even boasted that he had "got away with GBH" (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/c...-dead.html ) yet a woman juror who looked up a defendant on the internet was jailed for six months for "contempt of court".

Sadly, the justice system is full of the great and good who like lording it over the rest of us and the official sentencing guidelines (http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/s_to_u/sente...fit_fraud/ ) suggest that Lucy will be very lucky indeed to avoid jail. Only my twopennerthworth, but that would not just be inappropriate, it would be wrong.

Whats pregnant at 16 got to do with owt? That was her choice to get pregnant.

So what youre saying is, because some other have been let off lightly so should lucy?

Yeah it may be sad that a family gets the bad end of any jail time, but thats on lucy and nobody else, thats usually enough of a deterrent to normal people

Anyway..
It's her life...

but in my eyes...
Bankers
Politicians (these fookers get my back up)
Tax avoiding companies
do a lot worse than what she has done!