Red Light Central - Chat & Discussion

It's a tease and please thing its not supposed to be sex or naked your supposed to use your imagination and not just use the visual. Stop complaining about the minor details and enjoy it for what it is

Exactly I don't give a monkeys about whether a babe wears 2 pairs of knicks. It's up to the babe herself. Also some outfits require the babe to wear 2 pairs. Just sit back and enjoy the show

(28-04-2011 06:27 )Mellie D Wrote:  I was only wearing one pair of knickers last night, not big ones either. A thong. So you are exaggerating. The number of knickers a girl decides to wear is down to her. Do you honestly think that before a show we say "no you can't go on air unless you are wearing a billion pairs of pants" or something of that sort?

(27-04-2011 23:53 )mr mystery Wrote:  what i mentioned was the fact that Jemma and the rest of the RLC girls are wearing 2 pairs of quite big knickers tonight ...

(28-04-2011 06:27 )Mellie D Wrote:  I was only wearing one pair of knickers last night, not big ones either. A thong. So you are exaggerating. The number of knickers a girl decides to wear is down to her. Do you honestly think that before a show we say "no you can't go on air unless you are wearing a billion pairs of pants" or something of that sort?

(27-04-2011 23:53 )mr mystery Wrote:  what i mentioned was the fact that Jemma and the rest of the RLC girls are wearing 2 pairs of quite big knickers tonight ...

Thanks Mellie didn't realise you had only got 1 pair on , it looked like you had got 2 pairs on to me and they were bigger than the girls wear on other channels , maybe i should get a better tv
Glad to hear that the RLC girls aren't made to wear a "billion pairs of pants" (slight exaggeration there me thinks ) they would never get them all on .

(28-04-2011 08:35 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  Exactly I don't give a monkeys about whether a babe wears 2 pairs of knicks. It's up to the babe herself. Also some outfits require the babe to wear 2 pairs. Just sit back and enjoy the show

I have no problem with the girls wearing to pairs of knickers either if it's the babe's them selves that want to have to pairs on , no girl should be put in a position due to pressure from the company she works for or members of this forum or her callers to do and show more than she is comfortable doing , but saying that i personally prefer watching or calling girls that don't tend to wear 2 pairs , that's my preference .
When i made my original comment last night i was not aware that it was Jemma Jey that had herself decided to do the show wearing 2 pairs of knickers , Jemma has in the past mostly worn on other channels 1 very small pair of knickers or gone naked , so thought RLC must have instructed her to wear the 2 pairs , i now know according to Millie that it was Jemma herself that wanted to wear 2 pairs and that it was not RLC's decision .

(28-04-2011 08:22 )Broncobilly Wrote:  It's a tease and please thing its not supposed to be sex or naked your supposed to use your imagination and not just use the visual. Stop complaining about the minor details and enjoy it for what it is

Sorry mate i was not aware that the RLC channels were not about sex or naked and you have to use you imagination , i probably watch the other channel to much that are about sex and nakedness and are about visual stimulation

I'm really loving RLC at the moment. I'm watching it way more than I am for the other channels. My current top channel

(27-04-2011 23:53 )mr mystery Wrote:  I posted a few comments in Jemma Jey's thread but have since deleted them because they were more about RLC in general than Jemma . what i mentioned was the fact that Jemma and the rest of the RLC girls are wearing 2 pairs of quite big knickers tonight , all the girls on the other channels are wearing just i pair or no pairs (naked) or skimpy costumes , RLC tonight is by far the tamest of all the channels and much tamer than the Sport xxx channels, we know Ofcom have issues with Lucy Summers , but do RLC really need to make a girl like Jemma wear 2 pair of knickers ? , RLC are totally spoiling Jemma's shows with their "in house" regimental rules IMO , Cellcast used to allow Jemma to wear skimpy G strings on freeview Partypeople and Partygirls in the days before the girls were allowed to go topless , So Mellie or Cathy if you read this what is the reason why the girls on RLC a channel that has a 18+ licence and is in the adult section of the Sky EPG are having to wear double the amount of knickers to what the usually do or a least wear 2 pairs for the earlier part of the night shows ? whereas girls from all the other channels are allowed to wear far less , also will the girls ever be allowed to get naked again ? i look forward to you answers .

Of course they are gonna be tamer, they are ran by Playboy, they have got a lot of pressure from high up, and to be honest they seem to be doing well enough without breaking the rules??!! Of course the girls will get naked again but they had several ofcom complaints (no doubt from someone who runs another channel) they are just gonna play safe for a while....Mellie I love you!

(15-04-2011 00:08 )iloveMegan Wrote:  It looks like RLC are at it again

I tried calling Dannii Harwood about a month ago and just got "You are now entering the red light lounge" message followed by silence for around twenty seconds, then I was kicked back to the menu. I tried again last Thursday and the same thing happened. I'm not going to try tonight, but given how much time she has spent waving her phone it definitely seems the same thing is happening tonight.

While trying to get through, I heard the same thing happen to quite a few other callers, it seemed that only every sixth caller or thereabouts actually gets through

And the exact same thing is happening tonight. Dannii only does one nightshow a week and has a big fanbase. Why Red Light can't just make money out of that instead of trying to squeeze a bit extra out of callers by either cutting them off or not putting them through in the first place is beyond me.

And in doing so they're likely to be putting people off calling in again. Does screwing a lot of people out of a small amount make better business sense than providing a decent service people are willing to spend a lot of money on (£1.53 isn't exactly cheap), and potentially become repeat customers of?

(29-04-2011 00:11 )iloveMegan Wrote:  Why Red Light can't just make money out of that instead of trying to squeeze a bit extra out of callers by either cutting them off or not putting them through in the first place is beyond me.

And in doing so they're likely to be putting people off calling in again. Does screwing a lot of people out of a small amount make better business sense than providing a decent service people are willing to spend a lot of money on (£1.53 isn't exactly cheap), and potentially become repeat customers of?

I will never call any of the channels again, its way too expensive, ive been there,paid the billls,couldve got several decent whores,or women i know to shag me for the cash i spent. Whilst it is tempting, its never,ever worth the cost! Im staggered at the amount who can still afford to call in, unless theyre using someone elses phone of whom they dont like?