(11-11-2021 18:32 )The tiny giant Wrote: ... When I first got the courage to phone into one of these channels I was shocked in the background noise I thought it was going to be just me and the babe I'd phoned. I could hear everything else that was going on in the studio and the babe seemed to be having a three way conversation between me the producer who she was tellin him to get her food and drink and also chatting to another babe at the studio.
Sorry to pull this quote from another thread but contemplating this one fascinated me tonight. It seems so representative of the oh so common (perhaps even quintessential) babeshow experience. Because, as anyone knows that's followed tiny's/dazzler's other posts, he continued his show use
despite this poor first exposure. And we all do this don't we? We go back, time and again, disregarding so many issues, because, well...
I'll ask it here of tiny of course: Why
did you still phone back after this mate?!
But if I may be so bold as to predict his answer... It'll either be because other better parts of the experience persuaded him to do so, or that he switched to other babes that did the trick for him instead.
It is beyond that though, where the real meat of this subject lies I feel. I mean, why do we persist in paying up so much - despite all the crap we face? Soooo much of the time we continue to return; beyond any reasonable expectation we might have in other arenas I'd suggest. Why
is that? Why are babeshow payers so tolerant?
I can only put it down to two things for the moment:
1. The implusive eternally hopeful, emotion led, part of the punt overcomes the rational elements of the choice - those elements the first part of this thread focused so heavily on. We ignore the rational and focus on the 'wrong' things essentially. The heart, or the cock, leads the head in a unique way for the consumer of adult material!
2. The unique qualities of what we judge as an interaction's 'good bits' are very difficult to source elsewhere. This formulates to an adrenaline rush of a 'winning' interaction that cannot be replicated in another arena. For the fan, an achieved high defeats all the losses incurred previously (and the prospects of future failings) because we are predisposed to think of it all as, at it's core, an essentially enjoyable game. The quest itself (for the high of a positive interaction) being an at least implicitly acknowledged part of the sustaining process of being a fan. IOW, we've been acclimatised to feel for our show use in the same manner that a gambler feels about his betting. We accept many 'buyer beware' elements we would scorn elsewhere as a result.
Of course there are limits to this. The proportion of satisfactory experiences must remain
adequate to us if the industry is to retain our paying custom. Fall below a certain thresholds and repeat use will still fall and, eventually, halt. But the nature of babeshow punting, seen as a gamble in this way, is what, IMO, holds these thresholds lower than they otherwise might be.