Babestation24 - Chat & Discussion (No Requests in this thread)

...a really dumb conspiracy.
Funny how mad some non calling users get when they don't see what is not "on the menue" by german law for tv program.

I rarely see anyone posting that they called a babe. So it is a free show and most of you are not spending any money. So why should BS24 care about non customers opinions?

You are cheap as your theory.

Divina’s quality was like watching a portable TV in the 80’s as a kid with really bad reception, coupled with the hand clamp which is as exciting as a wheel clamp, she was better off leaving her underwear on.

(19-01-2025 12:03 )Jay39 Wrote:  Divina’s quality was like watching a portable TV in the 80’s as a kid with really bad reception, coupled with the hand clamp which is as exciting as a wheel clamp, she was better off leaving her underwear on.

I thought she showed more before titti time than any other part of the night, It was a disappointing show but we all knew that would happen after her first appearance

(19-01-2025 08:35 )Cortez Wrote:  ...a really dumb conspiracy.
Funny how mad some non calling users get when they don't see what is not "on the menue" by german law for tv program.

I rarely see anyone posting that they called a babe. So it is a free show and most of you are not spending any money. So why should BS24 care about non customers opinions?

You are cheap as your theory.

You don't like me posting facts and evidence they are sabotaging certain babes on the show because I refuse to call? How is that even related. Some people just refuse to see whats directly in front of them. Thank you for revealing your one of them with your attempted deflection by changing the subject matter.

Well she's back next saturday but this time paired with Emma.

And with all that has been said I simply can not buy in to the 'arguement' that the studio deliberately borks transmission quality and for one perfectly good reason. People do actually pay and if you purposely reduce quality you alienate those that keep the service alive.

I will partially agree that a stream has to be re-encoded in real time. The web server only sends a maximum of 720p. Do they re-encode a 1080p intake and then output that back to to the three resolutions that one can see - I hardly think that the studio sends three such resolutions but not being an EXPERT in these matters I do not know. What I do know is that reknown streaming services such as Youtube do send multiple resolutions with the highest being what is uploaded there. So it would then follow if sterams are uploaded at 1080p then why not actually give such an option ?

And more so that I have yet to have an opportunty to see what Divina's webcam actually transmits via her host. But what I do know, having checked various streams via another 'sister' service, is that the maximum is 720p. But I will endevour to check this out as long as it is not too late.

Now I have been 'accused' more than once of defending this service. Let it be known that I have no financial or other interest in this - I am a 'free-loader' just like the vast majority of those that pulblish their opinion on here and mine is just that - an opinion. But last night the show went the distance to 5:00 (6:00 CET) - the actual stream borked like 30 mins later but I am relievd that I did not attempt to stop my recording after 3 am then and when I did crawl outa bed my recording was being muxed so I got it all (with full audio)

All RAW Streams are received by the studio, will be captured and added to their Overlays, background and OSG which is then sent out as their default broadcast of 1280x720 for the online stream. What we see is always that resolution from them.

How they capture and alter/recode each stream before they add the webcam windows to their feed is the issue were dealing with. Clearly last night, they decided to bork Divina's feed before adding it (but only after 22:00). It was done during her 1st break

BTW, there are no 3 resolutions on their site even though the cog wheel/video quality suggests otherwise its a lie. The default bitrate/resolution remains the same regardless of which 'quality' you chose. Its been like that for years.

As regards you not 'buying into my theory and argument' it isnt the first time they've done this. They did it with Abygale, (Maria on one occasion) & Lilly almost every show. I confirmed this with Lilly when I revealed what was happening to her streams and she checked that it was indeed being shall we say 'altered' in some way at source.

Im afraid you cant put common sense to these clowns, we've seen just what they are capable of many times. Anyway I'ive given my two cents, Im no conspiracy theorist, but and I know whats happening here. No point me continuing to repeat what Ive already posted.

Every Babe got an urgent reminder to strictly follow the guidelines.

Yet Peeptime still exists, so if a caller wants to take them panties off, they are coming off. Some positions therefore are not possible without the "handclamp". I do agree, it makes much more sense to keep on a micro thong. But a horny man on the phone (keep in mind, they’re the ones that make this show possible) is even harder to discuss with, than a man in general. So to everyone from the "hardcore gaping hole double fire extinguisher penetratio" section, to the "just an innocent flash right into the camera" ones, you might as well not tune in anymore.

For the quality, we got told, that our Bitrate is low. I refreshed my page and it was fine. That’s all I can say about me. So no favoritism here. Just a mouse click. Jorell it would be really nice, if you’d stop rumoring, that any technical issue that accrues on a night when I’m also around, has anything to do with me. Because now that you stated, that you contact women, telling them they get treated differently from me, (unless you change your post again and all of a sudden your statement disappears) it actually does damage.

So here’s my rumor: Babes don’t come back, because a certain user on here contacts them to tell them I am favored..

I took a screenshot, just in case you’re trying to manipulate and twist the shit out of this forum like meisterlampe did

i dont 'change' posts I usually 'Add' further detail to the post, and Im certainly NOT accusing or directing any of this your way nor apportioning blame towards you whatsoever. My theories are mine to post regardless, so is whom I contact or speak with so my posts will remain.

As regards the whole 'hand clamp' thing I totally understand your comments about guidelines and agree at times this is necessary. Take all the screenshots you like, I tend to add to a post rather than keep making separate ones like i just did with this one after seeing your comment!

(19-01-2025 15:14 )Wubbalubba Wrote:  Because now that you stated, that you contact women, telling them they get treated differently from me, (unless you change your post again and all of a sudden your statement disappears) it actually does damage.

So here’s my rumor: Babes don’t come back, because a certain user on here contacts them to tell them I am favored..

DO NOT accuse me of being the sole person responsible for babes not coming back. Lilly is the ONLY person I have actually ever spoken with and she continued on with the channel for months after that dialogue.

I just want everyone to be treated fairly and although its likely not ANY of your doing, the studio themselves are not very good at trying to appear unbiased at times with their behaviour