anchorman
Account Closed
Posts: 2,379
Joined: Dec 2008
|
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion
Lets call a spade a spade,you all know when scottishbloke said "shit" he meant performance wise and some of you are using it to win an argument that clearly cant be won.
We all know that each girl is sexy in their own way...otherwise they wouldn't be on these channels in the first place,but performance wise some are great and some are indeed "shit"
Some of the girls on BS have something for all fans and some have something for all the fanboys i.e good banter on the phones
For the record ive never seen daryl get naked on BS and i think we won't either
EDIT....one of the twins is in the white room right now naked and covered in oil,have a look if your into that sort of thing
(This post was last modified: 01-03-2012 07:52 by anchorman.)
|
|
01-03-2012 02:48 |
|
Addison
Lukewarm water
Posts: 998
Joined: Oct 2008
Reputation: 75
|
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion
(01-03-2012 02:00 )Scottishbloke Wrote: Addison I think you'll find there is a big difference between being critical on a model's performance and calling it shit as opposed to making the attack which gazfc did on Lucy Summers by calling her a fucking scumbag which had nothing to do with the babe shows which is exactly what the topic of discussion should only be about on these forums. Big fucking difference and don't you ever forget it. Also what the fuck has your post got to do with Babestation anyway, seems to me like your just trying to take a pot shot at me or something, oh how the world loves a smartass
Commenting on the way someone is doing their job is commenting on them, isn't it? gaz was wrong to say what he said about Lucy (although you could argue he was calling the act of benefit cheating the word he selected, and only tarring Lucy with the word by association, which is sort of what you're doing, or claiming to do, with Daryl and Paige). I only brought it up here because I think you're wrong to call Daryl and Paige what you did, and I'm trying to find a way to get you to see that. You have your favourites and can get very worked up if they cop flak, yet you seem blithely unconcerned about offending babes you don't particularly care about. Then it's all a case of the truth sometimes hurts blah-blah, and you can't mince your words etc, etc, and the trusty little bladewave smiley gets called to arms again. Constructive criticism is fine, but cheapskate abuse isn't. I don't think so, anyway. Still, presumably the next time Bailey puts in a drab performance, you'll be fine when someone states that "the bottom line is that Bailey is shit," because they're only trying to be critical of her performance.
(This post was last modified: 01-03-2012 02:57 by Addison.)
|
|
01-03-2012 02:51 |
|
Scottishbloke
Banned
Posts: 8,304
Joined: Jan 2010
|
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion
Exactly babefinder my critism about Daryl's show was nothing personal, I'm sure she's a lovely person, just not my cup of tea as I thought she delivered a dire performance more fitting to a day show. Nothing personal was intended in any way and at the end of the day that's only my opinion hence the reason this is a forum, no point having one if you can't be allowed to be critical aswell as praise worthy too which I've done on many an occasion also
PS - Addison, Bailey has a reputation second to none of delivering great show's whilst Daryl doesn't so that argument you came up with is totally flawed and holds no water whatsoever.
(This post was last modified: 01-03-2012 02:59 by Scottishbloke.)
|
|
01-03-2012 02:55 |
|