Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

(03-03-2012 18:59 )vila Wrote:  

(03-03-2012 11:48 )The Silent Majority Wrote:  Do the girls on Babestation look busier and is it harder to get through to them than the girls on the other channels?

You're not comparing like with like. It's bound to be easier getting through on the other channels as they don't have the 'girl caller' problem (leastways, as far as I know, given that I can only watch one of them).

Well that was my point

It should be much harder to get through on Babestation, given their much larger audience (irrespective of the girl callers, which aren't at the epidemic levels they were anyway) and if it wasn't harder to get through to the girls then it would suggest that Babestations freeview presence was masking the fact that, if they were on a level playing field with the other channels (i.e. sky only), they were performing very poorly on comparison.

However since no-one answered the question it's all academic.

(03-03-2012 20:29 )The Silent Majority Wrote:  Well that was my point

It should be much harder to get through on Babestation, given their much larger audience (irrespective of the girl callers, which aren't at the epidemic levels they were anyway) and if it wasn't harder to get through to the girls then it would suggest that Babestations freeview presence was masking the fact that, if they were on a level playing field with the other channels (i.e. sky only), they were performing very poorly on comparison.

However since no-one answered the question it's all academic.

Sorry, I thought you were suggesting that if it's easier to get through to the other channels they must therefore be doing worse than BS.

Am going to throw this into the mix, just watching Lolly and Camilla opening up the shows, and also seeing the girls on other nights, do you get the feeling that there is no concern about their futures, that everything will work out ok in the long run. I have been in a position of having an uncertain future, so if the girls are worried then big respect for not showing any concern.

Whatever else anyone might think of them, they're professionals and I wouldn't expect them to allow any such concern to show.

(03-03-2012 21:07 )matt38 Wrote:  Am going to throw this into the mix, just watching Lolly and Camilla opening up the shows, and also seeing the girls on other nights, do you get the feeling that there is no concern about their futures, that everything will work out ok in the long run. I have been in a position of having an uncertain future, so if the girls are worried then big respect for not showing any concern.

I doubt many of them would even know what the future of the company is. The babes who worked for Bang Media certainly appeared clueless when that company went our of business. In fact, I think several of those babes actually found out the real truth (the whole Ofcom v Bang Media thing) via this forum. We'll all see how Cellcast is fairing when they release their final results for the year in June, but it's obvious that the cost cutting measures they announced last year are still happening.

Been reading this thread with interest,about the pros and cons at whats happening at B/S at the moment,all I will say personally as things stand at the moment,line up wise,thats 1500 odd quid a year thats not going B/S way.Elite and R/L.C is where my money is going now.To me anyway the start of Babestation going down hill was the launch of extreme,and everything after,and still is now revolves around this channel,the worst thing they ever done.The glamours gone,the funs gone.I think personally its the worst line up B/S have ever had at the moment,No Glamour,just in your face pornstar fake types,if you like this sort,good luck to you,I for one do not,

(03-03-2012 21:32 )dogman Wrote:  Been reading this thread with interest,about the pros and cons at whats happening at B/S at the moment,all I will say personally as things stand at the moment,line up wise,thats 1500 odd quid a year thats not going B/S way.Elite and R/L.C is where my money is going now.To me anyway the start of Babestation going down hill was the launch of extreme,and everything after,and still is now revolves around this channel,the worst thing they ever done.The glamours gone,the funs gone.I think personally its the worst line up B/S have ever had at the moment,No Glamour,just in your face pornstar fake types,if you like this sort,good luck to you,I for one do not,

No it went down hill from when they brought in BSXTRA the texting show because they kept changeing the format every couple of shows. Thats when it all started to go down hill. After that they just kept screwing us over with different stuff. But as we all know BS knows best, Even when we think things cant get any worse surprise it does. LOL

(03-03-2012 21:07 )matt38 Wrote:  do you get the feeling that there is no concern about their futures, that everything will work out ok in the long run.

There is no concern because nothing has happened, other than letting a few girls go. Everyone expected this anyway with there being only 2 Babestation channels now, so why would anyone be concerned?

(03-03-2012 17:26 )Tutankamon Wrote:  

(02-03-2012 17:52 )cmiller Wrote:  Paige said in her blog that she needed to "change a few things around to accomodate other parts of your life"

that makes it sound like she was trying to reduce her shifts

What that means in plain English is that Elite can't offer Paige the number of shifts she used to get at Babestation. Which is hardly surprising, given the number of girls Elite have on their books at the moment.

no it doesnt, paige wants to do more work away from the babeshows and going to elite will enable her to do this

see its the same babes again tonight, camilla, lolly and priya

Slight feeling a deja vu tonight on BS its like 24hours have passed but its the exact same, Lolly camilla priya. Maybe they are struggling to fill the slots seeing as alot of the girls have now jumped ship !