Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity

(15-05-2012 20:34 )mrmann Wrote:  Embarrassing bodies on 135 sky just had a man open his penis hole infront of three people to tell them about an injury. It's not even 10pm yet. Ofcom loves those penises.

There showing tits now

(15-05-2012 19:50 )Kenilo Wrote:  Crazy horse on Sky Arts the other night where showing plenty if you consider that the girls on the babe channels where only thinking of getting their tits out. Capped this at 10.05

Unfortunately, when I stumbled across this (as some woman was slipping her knickers off over her arse) it was at my sister's with her and my niece sat there. For some reason I didn't feel I could slip the old fella out and start shuffling

(15-05-2012 20:56 )StanTheMan Wrote:  

(15-05-2012 19:50 )Kenilo Wrote:  Crazy horse on Sky Arts the other night where showing plenty if you consider that the girls on the babe channels where only thinking of getting their tits out. Capped this at 10.05

Unfortunately, when I stumbled across this (as some woman was slipping her knickers off over her arse) it was at my sister's with her and my niece sat there. For some reason I didn't feel I could slip the old fella out and start shuffling

Why not? Isn't that what family is for?

Sex, Lies and Rinsing Guys on Channel 4 right now, featuring the babeshows very own Danica. It's about glamour models who use their 'charm' and beauty to get free gifts and allowances from men.

Danica always did strike me at this type

Oops, I'm about 10hrs behind the times - just noticed the thread TheWatcher started this morning.

Is there a Facebook page with a list of suggested gifts?

As for Game of Thrones (or GOT as saddos call it) there are interesting comments on DigitalSpy about how gratuitous and staged the sex is compared to other shows. A simple test is how much sense the scene or episode would make without it, or with the explicit bits filmed non explicitly.

The Bridge for example had a scene where a character has vigorous sex, rolls over and goes to sleep. That is entirely justified because it illustrates deeply odd behaviour. But the scene in Inspector Montablano where a naked dead woman is draped over a table and there are lingering shots of her arse is unnecesary. The penetration scene at the start of Antichrist is also unnecessary, the same effect could be achieved with above waist shots and the woman arching her back in orgasm while the couple neglect their child.

Aye well it's hardly family viewing now is it eccles, since Ofcom seem to ignore the whole point of a watershed then I'd say any minor watching that filthy programme would be deeply distressed and it would probably damage them mentally and no doubt it would have long term effects on them and eventually they'd be deemed a threat to this society. Without a doubt this programme is obviously harmful and offensive, not my word's but the words of Ofcom.

You see it's a double edged sword here, I say the more sex and nudity we see on the telly the better. If Ofcom start to go down with the heavy handed approach with the mainstream channels then we know that all forms of erotic entertainment are under threat.

On the other hand you want Ofcom to kick up a fuss about it so that they eventually piss off the wrong people who clearly don't get fucked around with by anybody and who say right that's it fuck it we'll see you bastards in the courtroom.

This just might explain why Ofcom have and will remain to pick on the easy targets instead. They know damn well that the Adult channels are viewed primarily by the minority so don't deem them a threat to their unlawful constitution.

Ofcom are not stupid they know exactly what they are doing and their motives for doing so are highly corrupt.

Embarrising Bodies last night had a breast check with loads of topless women on at 8:35, just wondering if anyone thought the woman at the front looked like page3 legend Tracey Elvik?? http://www.page3.com/thegirls/traceys-pr...18283.html

(16-05-2012 06:37 )padzer1 Wrote:  Embarrising Bodies last night had a breast check with loads of topless women on at 8:35, just wondering if anyone thought the woman at the front looked like page3 legend Tracey Elvik?? http://www.page3.com/thegirls/traceys-pr...18283.html

Just another example of Ofcom turning a blind eye to something shown an hour and a half before the watershed, and them throwing a fit over a flash on the adult channels far after the watershed.

(16-05-2012 12:25 )mrmann Wrote:  

(16-05-2012 06:37 )padzer1 Wrote:  Embarrising Bodies last night had a breast check with loads of topless women on at 8:35, just wondering if anyone thought the woman at the front looked like page3 legend Tracey Elvik?? http://www.page3.com/thegirls/traceys-pr...18283.html

Just another example of Ofcom turning a blind eye to something shown an hour and a half before the watershed, and them throwing a fit over a flash on the adult channels far after the watershed.

That's the whole crux of it. Nudity designed to arouse is bad. Nudity designed to educate is good.

This is the reality in Ofcon's world.

What a strange bunch they are.

Caught half a documentary about the Medieval Mind the other week. Apparently it was considered possible for a man to commit adultery with his own wife.

If he had sex for the purpose of creating a child that was OK.
If he had sex for pleasure that was adultery (enjoyable).
If ... not man on top ...
If ... more than once a day ...
If ... on a Sunday or Saint's Day ...
If ... dressed in a gimp mask while wife dressed as a French Maid ...

(I may have made up the last one).

Point is Ofcom are exercising judgements based on the purpose of a show rather than the strength and thats an attitude that was discarded in 1959 with the Lady Chatterly trial and 1968 when the Lord Chamberlains role in theatre censorship was abolished.

Ofcoms attitude predates these and is medieval. Functional OK. Pleasure banned.