StanTheMan
Banned
Posts: 3,790
Joined: May 2009
|
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity
(01-06-2012 19:23 )Sootbag1 Wrote: I don't think people on this forum quite 'get it' If the broadcaster is trying to get the viewer to phone up a premium rate telephone number and part with his cash, then Ofcom will not allow overtly sexual imagery to be used to entice the viewer to ring the sex chatline.
I think we 'get it', Sootbag. Most of us understand their regulation, but what we don't get or understand is why they think like they do. A fanny is a fanny is a fanny. Why does it matter whether that fanny is being shown in some late-night film or on a babeshow advertising a premium rate telephone service??
The prices and TOS are there for everyone to see, so why do Ofcom feel they need to be involved? Why do they assume the role of our carer and guardian, protecting us from spending our money on a sex-line service? What the FUCK has it got to do with Ofcom if Joe Bloggs wants to spend £10 of HIS money calling a babeshow chatline?
(This post was last modified: 01-06-2012 22:11 by StanTheMan.)
|
|
01-06-2012 22:08 |
|
eccles
custodes qui custodiet
Posts: 3,032
Joined: May 2010
Reputation: 69
|
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity
At the risk of contradicting my previous post, channel 5* (Sky 176) is showing Real Sex: Some Like It Hot now, 11 to midnight. Usual fake documentary format, I cannot believe the supposedly normal people who tell a complete stranger on camera their sexual fantasies, history and masturbation techniques.
Fleeting glimpses, but a glimpse of fanny where two naked women were covered with whipped creme and fruit. Though "covered" is misleading.
A group of 8 women had a masturbation party, orgasming in front of friends and camera.
A man with a fetish for BIG women was shown with his tackle out, no lingering shot there. (Dont tell Fedup!) We also got to see a fat woman apparently holding his knob, an attractive young woman wearing a blue strap on approaching another woman and someone with their and firmly between an attractive womans naked legs. Nothing graphic, but a few genital shots and a lot that would not be allowed on a babe channel.
Then it went into adult babies and their elderly "moms", nearly made me spill my Campairi. I did when without so much as a logo it segued into the Tampax Pearl ad and a shot of tweed clad Mother Nature. Now I have an embarrasing stain on my Kalvin Kliens. Oh no, the adult babies are back. Must admit the maid looks interesting.
BUT It is made out to be a documentary, so Ofcom say thats OK. Does anyone take this stuff seriously?
Gone fishing
|
|
02-06-2012 22:54 |
|
mrmann
Posting Machine
Posts: 15,880
Joined: May 2009
Reputation: 92
|
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity
(04-06-2012 01:41 )Digital Dave Wrote: Sexcetera is a searing and courageous documentary series, highly commended by Ofcom.
Actually, I think it was Scottishbloke who pointed out that even Sexcetera has been censored, with fanny shots shown in the earlier transmissions now being pixellated out.
He must not be watching much of it then. You should read my rant from a couple weeks back. Whenever I watch Sexcetera, that's the level it's at. Penis shots galore uncensored, 75% of the vaginal shots uncensored, especially full frontal, mutilation uncensored, blade through penis shaft uncensored and prolonged, violent nude spanking, whiping, hooks through nipples, dildos up the bum almost showing all etc.
|
|
04-06-2012 01:58 |
|
fedup1
Senior Poster
Posts: 131
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 8
|
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity
(04-06-2012 01:58 )mrmann Wrote: (04-06-2012 01:41 )Digital Dave Wrote: Sexcetera is a searing and courageous documentary series, highly commended by Ofcom.
Actually, I think it was Scottishbloke who pointed out that even Sexcetera has been censored, with fanny shots shown in the earlier transmissions now being pixellated out.
He must not be watching much of it then. You should read my rant from a couple weeks back. Whenever I watch Sexcetera, that's the level it's at. Penis shots galore uncensored, 75% of the vaginal shots uncensored, especially full frontal, mutilation uncensored, blade through penis shaft uncensored and prolonged, violent nude spanking, whiping, hooks through nipples, dildos up the bum almost showing all etc.
I only have freeview and Sexcetera fanny lips are all pixellated out,,penis shots galore as usual..
Imagine this been talked about;
OMG they showed a penis on Sexcetera last night with both testicles in shot and the mans legs were apart..Well on Sex Lessons they showed a penis with foreskin pulled back for 3 seconds but you could not see urethra,..well Naked Britain on Pick TV showed a mans urethra last night but was pixellated out..On Sex Lessons they showed a man with his legs apart with penis and testicles in view with no censorship cant believe it...Well on Sexcetra they showed a penis uncensored and the man had his forskin back and testicles in view my god it was sexually explicit..I watched Eurotrash last night and all penises were censored out but vaginas were shown with fanny lips apart and you see everything its so sexist why do they ban the penis on UK TV..Yeah why are penises banned on tv yet you can show vaginas with hole and urethra etc
Do you see what i mean this could have been the rules in the begginig and women would be talking like the above because penises can only be shown if medical or arty.What if in the beggining it was illegal to show a penis in full shot with foreskin pulled back and heaven forbid the urethra because its So Sexually explicit ..
Do you see how they can make up any rules ,,they show penis all the time but decide to ban the vagina with NO VALID REASON WHATSOEVER...Why is the vaginal lips,urethra and vaginal hole banned yet they show a penis with foreskin pulled back and erethra which is sexually explicit also..There is no reason its just made up rules which folk except WELL I DONT ITS PURE SEXISM..
Ofcom treat male and female genatalia differently when its what we are born with,,OFCOM are therefore sexist fucking twats.
|
|
04-06-2012 14:22 |
|