bytor
Posting Machine
Posts: 3,680
Joined: Feb 2009
Reputation: 55
|
RE: Elite TV - General Chat & Discussion
(12-06-2012 23:52 )mrmann Wrote: Caty is promoting EXPLICIT pictures of herself right now available by texting, as in open leg from the front and behind.
Please tell me this isn't a scam on the level of Cellcast! In the pics, it looks as if Caty has her hand in place, because it's far to scary to show what is promised to paying customers, not that we haven't seen all before in her past content anyway.
So, is this a scam, or is Elite still sticking to their better than average standards? Anyone know? If it doesn't appear to be a scam, then I'll delete this comment.
Not having seen it I cannot say if it is a scam. Is there wording to suggest the picture customers will receive will be explicit and full frontal? Has Caty been on the mic to say the same? If not and they are simply showing a photo with a hand thong then its not a scam.
The channels rely greatly on the customers own desperate expectations when it comes to selling stuff.
It amazes me how many people seemingly buys pics on the promise of 'see me naked' then complain when they get a girl with no clothes on discreetly hiding her pussy from view!
The photo sold is as described. It is simply the viewer who interprets naked to mean explicit. The channels know this and exploit it. Questionable ethics perhaps but not a scam, or anything that would hold up in court.
Of course if they are actually stating explicit and customers are not receiving such then that it a different matter.
|
|
13-06-2012 06:40 |
|
mrmann
Posting Machine
Posts: 15,880
Joined: May 2009
Reputation: 92
|
RE: Elite TV - General Chat & Discussion
(This post was last modified: 13-06-2012 19:35 by mrmann.)
|
|
13-06-2012 13:24 |
|
mr mystery
Account closed by request
Posts: 5,798
Joined: Sep 2009
|
RE: Elite TV - General Chat & Discussion
(13-06-2012 13:04 )Rammyrascal Wrote: disagree it isnt a scam mrmann. elite are just saying the pictures are explicit, not saying how explicit they are. if elite had said explicit pics of caty full frontal and if the pics actually werent full frontal then it would be a scam. but because elite have just said explicit its not
Using words like Explicit pictures of me (not me personally lol) could give the impression to the viewers that she is referring to full frontal open leg nudity , viewers may well purchase these pics thinking that they will see Caty's lady bits , only to be disappointed , these viewers may well feel they have been conned just like the BS viewers may well think they have been conned after purchasing pics described as explicit of Geri or Lori etc .
The channels clearly use words that could mislead people into thinking that they will see full frontal explicit nudity when they receive these pics of the girls that don't show everything , in my view this is wrong no matter what channel does it .
By the way advertisements on channels don't have to be blatant lies when advertising a service , as far as i know Ofcom can find channels in breach for giving out info in a manor designed to mislead customers into purchasing something , ie giving the impression that pics are explicit when they are not .
Life is short . Break the rules, Forgive quickly, Kiss slowly, Love truly, Laugh uncontrollably, and never regret anything that made you smile .
(This post was last modified: 13-06-2012 19:07 by mr mystery.)
|
|
13-06-2012 18:22 |
|