Naked Babestation review

All the adult broadcasters are dying on their feet. Naked Babestation has a virtual monopoly and should have as many customers as they can handle. Remember the old SportXXX and TXVLive encrypted shows? "Only" 3 hours nonstop live content a night, full on oral, toy penetration, fingers, anal and strapons, almost but not quite shown? Even the occasional boy girl show with ejaculation.

Does anything today compare?

Who is to blame?

(30-06-2012 18:48 )blackjaques Wrote:  

(30-06-2012 11:42 )Doc Holliday Wrote:  But in my opinion the use of toys hurts this kind of show, because as soon as toys come into it the action has to happen off camera, which I find quite tedious.

Doc, the only reason that Ofcon can justify this policy to the viewing public is on the grounds of "child protection". That is the only reason they can give for the censorship of these images.

Yes I understand that it's not allowed by Ofcom, but my argument is that the rules are there and so we have to live within those rules. If that means no action with toys then let's accept that and have shows without toys.

I found myself tempted by Naked Babestation again last night and ended up watching for the second night in a row. I was not disappointed! Lacey Lorenzo was terrific and put on a smashing show. I thought Lucia Love was good the night before, but Lacey took Naked babestation to a whole new level. What a girl! Thanks Lacey and thanks also to the cameraman who did a good job too. On the basis of last night I'm a very satisfied customer.

I'm not sure why people still bother with paying for these channels when there is infinite more content available online either via the vast libraries that exist or live cams. Why would you pay £5 for BS Extreme when you could in theory see many of the same girls appear online doing and showing much more for the same price or less (or free in some cases)? I cannot see any of these channels surviving another ten years, the customers simply will not be there (the younger generation do not call BS surely??).

(03-07-2012 10:44 )barracuda Wrote:  Lacey Lorenzo was terrific and put on a smashing show.

I must agree with this. I saw Lacey Lorenzo last night and really liked the show. I've watched Naked Babestation a few times now and seen 6 girls on it altogether and Lacey's performance last night was the best of the lot. Full marks to her and to Naked Babestation for the good entertainment.

I've just found this thread and thought I'd contribute my own Naked Babestation review.

I've seen Naked Babestation 5 times. One of those times I was conned plain and simple, because one of the promised girls only appeared for a few minutes. Another time was a bit disappointing, because it was a two girl show where one of the girls seemed to feature much more than the other and it was the other girl I was more interested in. The other 3 times were good shows, including Lily Pink last night. I'm assuming it was her first time on Naked Babestation, in which case I think she did very well. The lighting and camerawork were good too. Overall it was a good effort by Naked Babestation, with the only little problem that the mic didn't work on about 3 occasions or maybe wasn't switched on.

One thing about last night that I give a particular thumbs up to is the extended show format which I hadn't seen before. I don't know how long they've been doing these extended shows, or how often they do them, but to me it's a big improvement on the 3 separate slots format and really makes for a much better show. Surely this extended format is the way forward for Naked Babestation.

Lily Pink was very good last night. Natural voluptuous body with the
minimum of tats. Especially liked the fully naked shower section with
the water dripping from her pussy, and the between her legs POV's.
She was on for 2 hours with a few short breaks, and appeared to be busy on the phones.
Tiffany's "naked" shower section was so tame that it could have been
on FTA on 10pm. She and Babestation should be ashamed of themselves
because once again an established performer over promised and under
delivered.

(04-07-2012 11:38 )KRISB Wrote:  Lily Pink was very good last night. Natural voluptuous body with the
minimum of tats. Especially liked the fully naked shower section with
the water dripping from her pussy, and the between her legs POV's.

Yes it was nice to see her lying on her back facing the camera. It sounds like an obvious position, but other girls I've seen have hardly used it, preferring lying on the side and being on all fours. One of the things that made Lily's show good was the variety of using a lot of different positions, including lying on her back facing the camera and also kneeling up in front of the camera, which other girls haven't used much either.

(04-07-2012 11:38 )KRISB Wrote:  Tiffany's "naked" shower section was so tame that it could have been
on FTA on 10pm.

You are right. In fact in my review above I didn't even bother to mention Tiffany's appearance.

(01-07-2012 00:35 )eccles Wrote:  At the risk of being boring, Ofcum would argue that subject matter expert the BBFC and Parliament have deemed sexually explicit material to be harmful to under 18s. "It wasnt us gov, talk to the BBFC".

Presumably explicit material might encourage masturbation.

In the 1950s theatres were allowed to show female nudity provided they didnt move, based on an argument that museums had naked statues. That argument would be rejected these days.

Basically if it gets you hard and is explicit it is sex, therefore banned.

[edit] PS. Channel 4 is showing Hostel II tonight from 10pm. Thats universally available and has no age control in most homes. Seems mutilating young women is acceptable, despite being easily copied and nonconsentual.

As far as I know, the courts ruled that sexually explicit material was not in and of itself harmful to minors. That is why hardcore magazines can be sold in newsgents and dvds in sex shops. Ofcom justifies it's position using the so-called precautionary principle - in other words it is possible that seeing this sort of thing MAY harm SOME minors, so they prevent ANYONE from seeing it.

So stumbling across your dad's porn mag - not harmful.

Stumbling across your dad's porn dvd - not harmful.

Stumbling across your dad's porn tv channel - turns you into a sexual psychopath willing to rape a hamster as long as it doesn't burst first!

(04-07-2012 11:30 )Mr Injecy Wrote:  I don't know how long they've been doing these extended shows,

As far as I know they started in early May, so therefore no more than 2 months ago.