BabestationX & Live Shows - Chat & Discussion

They must be running on a really low budget with so few girls. Asking people to pay for a model who doesn't do anything remotely sexual is plain daft....don't bother encrypting tonite it won't be necessary.

Response from Babestation X.

Don't worry lads, we're still making shit loads of money from all the other fucking idiots out there.

Geri's on tonight. The one night im glad there's no sound on the live shows!!!!! Lol. Sorry, but im sick of geri doing that annoying fake twangy american accent she does frequently on the mic!!!

I'd observe that throughout all 9 live shows from Cherri last night which must total around 3 hours, there was perhaps at best 5 minutes where there wasn't a huge great OSG down the right hand side of the screen advertising pics or whatever.
The previous incarnation of the channel took several iterations to bring the OSGs under control. Hopefully they'll get to this a little quicker given we've already paid £'s to watch the show in the first place, so adding advertising for more seems excessive...

^^^

9 Live shows. Are you sure? For the shows I've seen, there have been 3 shows with each of those split twice with 3 minute ads for upcoming scenes that anyone who watched X in the first week would have seen numerous times.

I'd hate to be a caller watching the babe on screen and suddenly being interrupted by a full screen ad for something they have watched or have no desire to watch. Hmmm. Sounds familiar.

And that huge OSG down the right was an even bigger joke in the first week when what was being offered were basically pics of girl on the set of the show they were watching. At £3 a pop.

I pity the mug punter who shelled out for those. Would have been better advised to come here and look at your screencaps!

Someone needs to report BSX to trading standards, they are blatantly lying about the content of their channel, If it was any other industry they would be facing huge fines for blatant false advertising.

(06-10-2012 00:24 )skank_whore Wrote:  they are blatantly lying about the content of their channel

What have they said then?

^^^

Nothing they couldn't argue was just a (deliberately) vague statement or description rather than a blatant lie.

Well, I would think that was the case. They couldn't really be that stupid could they? (I don't really pay attention to what is said or advertised beyond who's on)

Evidence please...

(01-10-2012 20:15 )m100 Wrote:  No the cut american films and crap before and after they were cut killergram stuff has gone. Replaced by the twilight zone of the same four short films night after night after ...... you get the picture. If we see them anymore it'll become karaoke-porn.

What I don't understand about the films beng shown is why you usually see less in the films that on the live shows? Surely the films are being censored more than is necessary?

(06-10-2012 10:36 )straw man Wrote:  

(01-10-2012 20:15 )m100 Wrote:  No the cut american films and crap before and after they were cut killergram stuff has gone. Replaced by the twilight zone of the same four short films night after night after ...... you get the picture. If we see them anymore it'll become karaoke-porn.

What I don't understand about the films beng shown is why you usually see less in the films that on the live shows? Surely the films are being censored more than is necessary?

The american/european and killergram films may have been supplied to babestation pre-cut to be fair so the strength of their content could have little to do with babestation. In the early months the live shows and some of the babestation own shot short films (in particular, camilla's threesome, tina love and ree petra etc) bordered on hardcore but were then cut when repeated in later months. Of the short films that they showed for the first seven nights of bsx, the saskia/jayden, kiki, and lacey's jacuzzi scenes will exist in hardcore versions - to those with quick eyes and dvd recorders penetration can be seen in more than one place and it's obvious in the jacuzzi scene that one camera is shooting 'soft' and one camera 'hard'. Whether they received any warnings from ofcom regarding content or whether they watered it down themselves as it was affecting photo and video sales at £3 a time compared to a few hours of near hardcore for a fiver is open to debate. They've said they won't challenge ofcom and you can read into that what you will.