BabestationX & Live Shows - Chat & Discussion

(08-10-2012 00:13 )Fernandez Esperenda Wrote:  Id rather see lori than geri on my screen!

Wow. Some choice there. I'd rather turn my screen off and count the specs of dust on it.

(08-10-2012 10:05 )GTIMKV Wrote:  I know that feeling from experience on other forums. The straw that broke the....overused cliche.... was people sending me PMs with links to download my own vids/pics and starting their own threads with my content on different forums. I recently went back to a place I left over 5 years ago and they're still doing it!

I recently by chance found some of my vids on another forum. I don't mind them being posted elsewhere but nowhere were they credited to either me or this forum. At least I now know why some had 3-4 times the downloads of others.

Its good to see Jada back and hopefully she'll do a night on BSX soon. Absolutely nothing wrong with having a few extra curves, if that is the case.

(08-10-2012 00:48 )Fernandez Esperenda Wrote:  Has lori flashed the gash yet?

I assume you must have been joking. A snowball crossed with a lemming and with a serious death wish would have a greater chance of navigating hell than of this happening.

The choice of girls to go naked is rapidly becoming a joke unless this is what the channel has decided to go for - distinct lack of full nudity

They appear to be running a very small stable of talent and most of them don't even do open leg so the hope that BSX will improve is virtually zilch. And two years ago we had uncut hardcore almost all night....

(08-10-2012 16:02 )SteveHG Wrote:  

(08-10-2012 00:48 )Fernandez Esperenda Wrote:  Has lori flashed the gash yet?

I assume you must have been joking. A snowball crossed with a lemming and with a serious death wish would have a greater chance of navigating hell than of this happening.

If you want to see the most of Lori watch the freeview shows she does, there is absolutely no point at in spending £5 on her paid for shows. You will get exactly the same content on freeview and will see no more, or no less, depending on you perspective.

Oh, and by the way, I have heard a viscious rumour that the girls do not tell the truth when promoting these shows.

(08-10-2012 20:25 )elroyticklestab Wrote:  They appear to be running a very small stable of talent and most of them don't even do open leg so the hope that BSX will improve is virtually zilch. And two years ago we had uncut hardcore almost all night....

This must be the unique selling point - same content as freeview, but you get to pay £5 to see it - now thats what i call niche marketing !!!

(08-10-2012 20:23 )billyboy1963 Wrote:  The choice of girls to go naked is rapidly becoming a joke unless this is what the channel has decided to go for - distinct lack of full nudity

I suspect that the channel will be more successful if they concentrate on Babestation girls, regardless of whether they go fully nude or not, rather than taking the random pornstar approach. I would guess that there are always going to be fans of Babestation girls out there who will be willing to watch their BabestationX shows, and that means more customers than there would be for random pornstars, even if you can rely on them to go fully nude.

No the channel will be more successful if they put something on it that is worth paying £5 to see.

(08-10-2012 22:42 )skank_whore Wrote:  No the channel will be more successful if they put something on it that is worth paying £5 to see.

That's a meaningless statement because everyone will have their own opinion about what's worth paying to see. You may have felt Jet Black was worth watching on Saturday or you may not. The same goes for Lori Buckby on Sunday or Chelsea French last night. If not enough people want to see those girls they won't keep appearing will they? So it's up to Babestation viewers as a whole to decide on who's going to appear on the channel.