Ofcom Discussion

(23-02-2013 17:00 )The Silent Majority Wrote:  What's wrong?

Embarrassed that you're the only one that thanked almost every post he/she made?

Why would that be embarrassing?

Munch thanked and didn't condemn the post quoted below that admits to "digging", lets not forget that the same "digging" applied to another forum fantasist, (simply looking at a facebook profile, which exposed years of lies posted on this forum), yet that "digging" was frowned upon.

(23-02-2013 11:00 )Digital Dave Wrote:  ^^^ Spot on, munch.

I knew she was a fantasist when she was last here two years ago because there were too many inconsistencies and generalities in what she said.

I've done a little digging on her and it's very interesting. She made the classic error of linking to her real Facebook page from her profile here (she's now removed the link).

Rather strange that people exposing freaks stealing photos of babies and children to share with members of this forum is frowned upon, yet those same members who defended that freak are playing detective with RCTV.

(23-02-2013 11:55 )admiral decker Wrote:  

(23-02-2013 01:53 )Scottishbloke Wrote:  Recently Dundee United changed their manager. Out went not only the departing manger but also the assistant and the first team coach also. So based on that I'd imagine whoever replaces ED in any future Ofcom committee would also want to bring in his/her own team.

So by following events at Dundee United we can better understand how Ofcom works.

That comparison was meant to clarify, but it just gets in the way of the point being made (we end up veering away from footy entirely at the end, into a consideration of who should get the blame when a ship sinks!). It perhaps works better when applied to the babe shows themselves. Like football clubs, they're competitively run organisations, out to win viewers and 'beat' their competitors, with babes signing and transferring to other channels, like star players. Ofcom is/are more like match officials, monitoring proceedings, with no vested interest in the 'result,' ensuring the rules of the game are abided by, and answerable to a higher agency (Parliament) as referees are (the F.A., FIFA).

(23-02-2013 18:30 )MONEY BANG Wrote:  

(23-02-2013 17:00 )The Silent Majority Wrote:  What's wrong?

Embarrassed that you're the only one that thanked almost every post he/she made?

Why would that be embarrassing?

Because it makes you look naive.

I only have a college diploma and know fuck all about ofcom but even I could see that it wasn't a PhD writing those posts.

(23-02-2013 21:10 )The Silent Majority Wrote:  I only have a college diploma and know fuck all about ofcom but even I could see that it wasn't a PhD writing those posts.

I always thought the 'PhD' thing was referencing the name of a production company ("Production Professional with PhD," not "with a Phd"). Meant to make you do a double-take, but not relating to an acquired qualification.

(23-02-2013 21:23 )Addison Wrote:  I always thought the 'PhD' thing was referencing the name of a production company ("Production Professional with PhD," not "with a Phd"). Meant to make you do a double-take, but not relating to an acquired qualification.

http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.php?tid=53112

(23-02-2013 18:30 )MONEY BANG Wrote:  

(23-02-2013 17:00 )The Silent Majority Wrote:  What's wrong?

Embarrassed that you're the only one that thanked almost every post he/she made?

Why would that be embarrassing?

Munch thanked and didn't condemn the post quoted below that admits to "digging", lets not forget that the same "digging" applied to another forum fantasist, (simply looking at a facebook profile, which exposed years of lies posted on this forum), yet that "digging" was frowned upon.

(23-02-2013 11:00 )Digital Dave Wrote:  ^^^ Spot on, munch.

I knew she was a fantasist when she was last here two years ago because there were too many inconsistencies and generalities in what she said.

I've done a little digging on her and it's very interesting. She made the classic error of linking to her real Facebook page from her profile here (she's now removed the link).

Rather strange that people exposing freaks stealing photos of babies and children to share with members of this forum is frowned upon, yet those same members who defended that freak are playing detective with RCTV.

Well i'm glad both have now been exposed, and neither can be defended in my book, both seem to have the same problem in that they live in fantasy land and wouldn't know the truth if it jumped up and bit them on the ass .
This is a Ofcom thread read by forum members and unregistered guests, some of us post stuff in this thread at times that may not be entirely accurate, but generally that's through ignorance because we don't know the facts, it's not us telling complete lies, we don't go round telling people we work for Ofcom or have worked for Ofcom, RCTV has been telling a complete pack of lies and misleading forum members into thinking he/she worked for Ofcom for 4 or so years and telling us stuff about his/her role in Ofcom that was completely fictitious . So i'm glad people have been doing a little digging to get to the truth about RCTV the same as i was about the other fantasy land member .

(04-07-2010 22:07 )RCTV Wrote:  I've been sent this picture of it claiming to be someone who it obviously isn't. I wondered if anyone could tell me who this is or if they recognise the picture?

Yes it's me, i'm actually female and work for Ofcom

(23-02-2013 21:36 )The Silent Majority Wrote:  http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.php?tid=53112

Fair enough! Hard to credit, but again, you take things on trust until you definitely know otherwise.

great how you guys seem to be jumping on someone who hasn't put any actual evidence down. WELL DONE VERY CLEVER OF YOU!!!!!

Dave you such a BIG MAN pming people with claims about me, why don't you pm them to me, I don't use my real name on that facebook

You can have dyslexia and get a PhD. a PhD doesn't equal amazing English and Grammar, it means you have a specialist knowledge in a subject area.

Lets not turn into one of those forums where the members spend all their time having a go at each other. What matters is the rules Ofcom imposes.