Elite TV / Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion

(28-02-2013 14:00 )mrmann Wrote:  I'll have to tell my prostitute mother about that one

WTF are you on about?

(28-02-2013 18:46 )eagle_si Wrote:  

(28-02-2013 14:00 )mrmann Wrote:  I'll have to tell my prostitute mother about that one

WTF are you on about?

What are you on about? Your earlier post didn't even make sense! Ya she was calling the caller a skank

Your post seemed to be just a pop at mrmann...like he doesnt give good info or something,course he does,its just maybe some folks round here cant handle the fact they're fav girl gets dicked by the crew

I would think the term skank would mean slutty,im pretty sure gemma would be well used to getting random retarded calls,but to imply on twitter of changing her job because it once again doesn't make sense...just putting it together it looks like gemma was talking about someone she works with,but we know that can't be right because all these girls are the best of friends

^^^ You obviously can't read. The main reason for my post was to respond to Rammy having a go at Gemma for posting the tweet. The rest of it was a humorous remark based on how most (if not all) of mrmann's wild theories end up to be absolute rubbish. But of course the fantasists with nothing better to do with their sad little lives lap it all up and take it as gospel. And seeing as you're now saying it's "fact" that girls get "dicked by the crew" then you're obviously one of them. Got photographic evidence have you?

At the end of the day, who gives a flying fuck who Gemma was tweeting about? Is it really that important to know who it was?

(28-02-2013 19:23 )eagle_si Wrote:  The main reason for my post was to respond to Rammy having a go at Gemma for posting the tweet.

What hairbald said was arguably worse, why not respond to him?

(28-02-2013 20:12 )iloveMegan Wrote:  

(28-02-2013 19:23 )eagle_si Wrote:  The main reason for my post was to respond to Rammy having a go at Gemma for posting the tweet.

What hairbald said was arguably worse, why not respond to him?

Perhaps he didn't want to appear baldist.

(28-02-2013 19:23 )eagle_si Wrote:  The rest of it was a humorous remark based on how most (if not all) of mrmann's wild theories end up to be absolute rubbish.

The rest of your post wasnt humorous,as i said it didnt even make sense...pure bullshit really! You trying to one up mrmann just made you look stupid,surely you dont even believe it yourself and not all mrmann's theories are rubbish,some maybe but he's spot on with alot of stuff!!

(28-02-2013 19:23 )eagle_si Wrote:  But of course the fantasists with nothing better to do with their sad little lives lap it all up and take it as gospel.

Now were comparing sad lives is it? You have more posts than me and mrmann put together and im sure your well up to date on these girls lives via twitter...would that be correct?

(28-02-2013 19:23 )eagle_si Wrote:  Got photographic evidence have you?

As for your off screen evidence,im sure you wouldn't have to look too long to find some...dont go posting it on the open forum tho

^^^ so as well as not being able to read, you also can't add up mrmann has over 7,000 posts, compared to my 6,865 (6,866 including this one). Now who's making who look stupid?

eagle, who are you to be telling rammy what he should or shouldn't be telling gemma to do?

(28-02-2013 21:00 )beardedbob Wrote:  eagle, who are you to be telling rammy what he should or shouldn't be telling gemma to do?

and who are you to be telling me to be telling Rammy to be telling Gemma what she should or shouldn't do? We could go on all day like this

(28-02-2013 21:00 )beardedbob Wrote:  eagle, who are you to be telling rammy what he should or shouldn't be telling gemma to do?

(28-02-2013 21:14 )eagle_si Wrote:  

(28-02-2013 21:00 )beardedbob Wrote:  eagle, who are you to be telling rammy what he should or shouldn't be telling gemma to do?

and who are you to be telling me to be telling Rammy to be telling Gemma what she should or shouldn't do? We could go on all day like this