£91,000 phone bill calling chatlines

(17-04-2013 10:21 )mellover Wrote:  To be fair you are spending a lot of money ...

A ton a month may seem a lot to some, but in the grand scheme of things it's not so bad. I know people who spend way more on a single night out just getting pissed. If you went to a lap dancing/strip club you'd probably spend way more for one nights entertainment in a similar hands off, look but don't touch scenario.

(17-04-2013 10:21 )mellover Wrote:  ...on women who wouldn't spit on you in the street.

Personally I prefer my women NOT to spit on me, in the street or elsewhere. If that is what you are into, then maybe you are the weirdo, not the one spending modest amounts on phoning the women on the babeshows (which is ultimately what the shows, and this forum, is all about)

(17-04-2013 03:41 )The Silent Majority Wrote:  

(16-04-2013 16:05 )RESPONSIBLE ADULT Wrote:  Is this thread a wind-up? It must be, because someone would have to be on the phone an awful long time to rack up a bill of 91K, even at premium rates. April fools day as just been and gone, could that have something to do with it? No, because then I read that someone gets angry with himself if he goes over a ton a month. A hundred pounds a month to ring some phone sex bimbo . Now I know it must be a piss take. Surely this whole story as been a set-up to make one hundred pounds a month seem reasonable, which it fucking well ain't.

That would be me then, you're talking about.

1. After I've paid all my bills, living expenses, taxes and pension premiums I will spend my surplus, hard earned, money how I like. That's my money, not vodafones, or some credit card company's, or anyone else's but mine. I'll be the judge of whether £100 is reasonable, not you. Because I know what my income is, you don't.

2. Alternatively I could smoke 10 fags a day or get bladdered in the pub every weekend. Who do think is likely to live to a healthy old age and who is likely to die prematurely after being a massive burden to the NHS and taxpayers?

3. As someone who actually spends money on the shows, thus helping keep them on air for the benefit of 1000's of freeloading 'wankers' like youself, I resent being accused of being a gullible wierdo (which is what you're inferring, isn't it) on a forum actually founded on, and dedicated to, the whole concept of the babeshows.

I mean, what are you even doing on here? Most of the vitriol on here is aimed at the channel owners, producers and Ofcom. I don't think I've seen anyone else with such a universal hatred of the girls themselves and the concept of calling them.

I just don't understand what your problem is...........no, wait..........I see it now.
You know who you remind me of?

Kevin

You can spend your hard earned fucking money any way you choose to, but that doesn't mean that I don't think you are totally bereft of any sense by spending it on the girls of babechannels. Why not spend it on taking out, and talking to a real life, in the flesh lady.

(17-04-2013 12:38 )RESPONSIBLE ADULT Wrote:  You can spend your hard earned fucking money any way you choose to, but that doesn't mean that I don't think you are totally bereft of any sense by spending it on the girls of babechannels. Why not spend it on taking out, and talking to a real life, in the flesh lady.

I'm sorry, I didn't realise it was 'either or'. It seems I may have inadvertently broken the 'rules' .........more than once.

(17-04-2013 12:38 )RESPONSIBLE ADULT Wrote:  You can spend your hard earned fucking money any way you choose to, but that doesn't mean that I don't think you are totally bereft of any sense by spending it on the girls of babechannels. Why not spend it on taking out, and talking to a real life, in the flesh lady.

By a similar logic, you can spend your time any way you choose to, but that doesn't mean some people won't think you are totally bereft of any sense by spending it on a forum dedicated to the babechannels, berating those channels, and the people who watch, enjoy, and participate in them. Why not spend it on talking to real life, in the flesh people.

(17-04-2013 14:35 )munch1917 Wrote:  By a similar logic, you can spend your time any way you choose to, but that doesn't mean some people won't think you are totally bereft of any sense by spending it on a forum dedicated to the babechannels, berating those channels, and the people who watch, enjoy, and participate in them. Why not spend it on talking to real life, in the flesh people.

But they DO have a right to that view and to aired it if so desired. Nobody is berating the channels or the girls or even this forum.

Presumably people are posting these post ARE real life persons, not ones i'd want to meet in the flesh i have others for that, but they are real.

Unless you are all bots.

(16-04-2013 22:16 )mikedafc Wrote:  3 months, 5 hrs a day at £3 pm on a mobile is how long it would take to run up a £91,000 bill

Kev has said his normal daily calling was 11 hours but was it sometimes longer, one time being as much as 22 hours. Earlier in this thread I calculated his average calling time to be 14.7 hours a day.

(15-04-2013 13:27 )D T Wrote:  

Does this forthcoming video mean that kev is unhappy with the media coverage he's been getting?

he posted that 3 days ago, hes obviously getting his story straight

(15-04-2013 17:52 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  that aint me that's told him to stay strong. ive blocked this person ages ago, its his twitter followers and supporters including AyVeewan that are mentioning me in tweets to him and now he's got a support kev twitter page

The support kev account has been suspended by twitter.

blimey still belive this Thread is still going 12 days after the articles in the papers