Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 16 Vote(s) - 3.38 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

£91,000 phone bill calling chatlines

Author Message
MONEY BANG Offline
Senior Poster
***

Posts: 149
Joined: Sep 2012
Reputation: 18
Post: #261
RE: £91,000 phone bill calling chatlines
(22-04-2013 19:51 )Tumble_Drier Wrote:  Did you try to Instruct him in the long lost art of Personal Responsibility by any chance?

Personal responsibility? If you take a look at the "Thatcher DEAD" thread on this forum you will see Babeshow fans of his age place the blame for their social inadequacies at the feet of that former Prime minister.

The issue of relevance: "In 1982, Racal Vodafone was awarded the first commercial mobile network operator licence in the UK by the Conservative Government"

(22-04-2013 19:51 )Tumble_Drier Wrote:  Failing that, you could just tell him he's an Oxygen Thief.

Thatcher didn't privatise the air we breath, that was the Governor of Mars, Vilos Cohaagen.
22-04-2013 20:43
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
The Silent Majority Offline
Not any more
*****

Posts: 5,859
Joined: Apr 2011
Reputation: 93
Post: #262
RE: £91,000 phone bill calling chatlines
(22-04-2013 19:25 )MONEY BANG Wrote:  
(22-04-2013 14:23 )seth Wrote:  How do you know Kev isn't a member here?

I spoke to him on the other forum.

So, are you speaking on his behalf then, when you ask for this thread to be deleted?

(22-04-2013 20:43 )MONEY BANG Wrote:  
(22-04-2013 19:51 )Tumble_Drier Wrote:  Did you try to Instruct him in the long lost art of Personal Responsibility by any chance?

Personal responsibility? If you take a look at the "Thatcher DEAD" thread on this forum you will see Babeshow fans of his age place the blame for their social inadequacies at the feet of that former Prime minister.

The issue of relevance: "In 1982, Racal Vodafone was awarded the first commercial mobile network operator licence in the UK by the Conservative Government"

And are you saying Kev's predicament is all Thatchers fault because she awarded Vodafone their first licence?

Interesting perspective.

Bounce
22-04-2013 22:21
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
MONEY BANG Offline
Senior Poster
***

Posts: 149
Joined: Sep 2012
Reputation: 18
Post: #263
RE: £91,000 phone bill calling chatlines
(22-04-2013 22:21 )The Silent Majority Wrote:  So, are you speaking on his behalf then, when you ask for this thread to be deleted?

If I was speaking on his behalf then this thread would have vanished by now.
23-04-2013 01:03
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
The Silent Majority Offline
Not any more
*****

Posts: 5,859
Joined: Apr 2011
Reputation: 93
Post: #264
RE: £91,000 phone bill calling chatlines
Well if he's not bothered, why is it bothering you so much?
23-04-2013 04:11
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
BarrieBF Offline
Posting Machine
*****

Posts: 1,209
Joined: Jul 2008
Reputation: 52
Post: #265
RE: £91,000 phone bill calling chatlines
(22-04-2013 20:18 )elgar1uk Wrote:  "take it from me do not make my mistakes, learn from my bad experience and hold on to your money and self respect".

It's good that Kev is recognising mistakes on his part, but does this mean he's shelved his video project?
23-04-2013 08:05
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
marlowe Offline
Posting Machine
*****

Posts: 1,284
Joined: Dec 2008
Reputation: 48
Post: #266
RE: £91,000 phone bill calling chatlines
I've got a feeling that the video was just talk on Kev's part and will never materialise, though if it does appear it will be interesting to see what further he has to say.
23-04-2013 10:55
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
MONEY BANG Offline
Senior Poster
***

Posts: 149
Joined: Sep 2012
Reputation: 18
Post: #267
RE: £91,000 phone bill calling chatlines
(23-04-2013 04:11 )The Silent Majority Wrote:  Well if he's not bothered, why is it bothering you so much?

He is bothered, very much so.

(23-04-2013 10:55 )marlowe Wrote:  I've got a feeling that the video was just talk on Kev's part and will never materialise, though if it does appear it will be interesting to see what further he has to say.

He is in the process of setting up a foundation to help like-minded individuals break away from the hold and life dominance of the Babe Shows.
23-04-2013 14:05
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
The Silent Majority Offline
Not any more
*****

Posts: 5,859
Joined: Apr 2011
Reputation: 93
Post: #268
RE: £91,000 phone bill calling chatlines
(23-04-2013 01:03 )MONEY BANG Wrote:  
(22-04-2013 22:21 )The Silent Majority Wrote:  So, are you speaking on his behalf then, when you ask for this thread to be deleted?

If I was speaking on his behalf then this thread would have vanished by now.

(23-04-2013 14:05 )MONEY BANG Wrote:  
(23-04-2013 04:11 )The Silent Majority Wrote:  Well if he's not bothered, why is it bothering you so much?

He is bothered, very much so.

So you are speaking on his behalf, then.

I wish you'd make up your mind Rolleyes
23-04-2013 14:13
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
archibald cockfoster Offline
Senior Poster
***

Posts: 243
Joined: Jul 2009
Reputation: 14
Post: #269
RE: £91,000 phone bill calling chatlines
(23-04-2013 14:05 )MONEY BANG Wrote:  He is bothered, very much so.

Reading the coverage and the comments he got in the newspapers must have utterly destroyed him then. He can consider himself fortunate that posters in this thread have been relatively kind to him.
(This post was last modified: 23-04-2013 14:54 by archibald cockfoster.)
23-04-2013 14:53
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
MONEY BANG Offline
Senior Poster
***

Posts: 149
Joined: Sep 2012
Reputation: 18
Post: #270
RE: £91,000 phone bill calling chatlines
(23-04-2013 14:13 )The Silent Majority Wrote:  So you are speaking on his behalf, then.

I wish you'd make up your mind Rolleyes

No, if I was speaking on his behalf, then this thread would have already vanished. Rolleyes

to "speak on behalf of a person or entity" is to "speak on their side or part as their explicitly or implicitly delegated representative."

To mention that he has publicly spoken about an individuals comments on this thread being devastating towards him is not "acting as a delegated representative".
23-04-2013 14:59
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply