Elite TV / Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion

Yes I would be very surprised if ofcom were to pull Studio66 up for something they'd actually done onscreen, I mean it's been so tame lately that it has to be something to do with screen adverts at inappropriate times. Digital Dave is correct, however as much as this channel probably deserves its comeuppance it's the last thing in reality that we all want to see. I want to see this channel back on it's feet again and with the recent signing of Jennifer Jade it would be very sad to see the shows getting even tamer due to politics out with our control but Studio66 must stop snitching on other channels and concentrate again on making their own entertaining again

(25-05-2013 22:59 )mr mystery Wrote:  

(25-05-2013 22:49 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  It was never said it was Jamie and bangbabes that offered to transport the evidence to Ofcom, although the evidence does point to them. also Jamie wasnt the channel boss (don't think he was) at bangbabes and isn't the boss at elite/s66

You have totally lost me with this comment Rammy, i can't understand what you are on about, Bang Babes were the channel grassed up by another babe channel broadcaster, (thought to be Elite), Bang Babes weren't the ones offering to transport the evidence to Ofcom if that's what you're saying ? .

lost myself actually now looking at it and got myself mixed up. what I meant was Ofcom said a channel had offered to send evidence they'd recorded of bangbabes breaking the rules but never said which one and there is seemingly indications that it was Jamie and elite tv, also people here think Jamie is the boss of s66/elite when he isn't

also as ive said before it isn't just s66/elite that grass on other channels, the other channels do it too.

(26-05-2013 09:42 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  lost myself actually now looking at it and got myself mixed up. what I meant was Ofcom said a channel had offered to send evidence they'd recorded of bangbabes breaking the rules but never said which one and there is seemingly indications that it was Jamie and elite tv, also people here think Jamie is the boss of s66/elite when he isn't

also as ive said before it isn't just s66/elite that grass on other channels, the other channels do it too.

Which just goes to show that you totally missed the point I was making anyway.

(26-05-2013 00:26 )Scottishbloke Wrote:  Yes I would be very surprised if ofcom were to pull Studio66 up for something they'd actually done onscreen, I mean it's been so tame lately that it has to be something to do with screen adverts at inappropriate times. Digital Dave is correct, however as much as this channel probably deserves its comeuppance it's the last thing in reality that we all want to see. I want to see this channel back on it's feet again and with the recent signing of Jennifer Jade it would be very sad to see the shows getting even tamer due to politics out with our control but Studio66 must stop snitching on other channels and concentrate again on making their own entertaining again

IMO this channel will not get back to it's best while the present people behind the scenes are in charge of things no matter what girls they sign, the people in charge are the main problem, they keep making fuck ups and attracting Ofcom's attention, they are the ones that's caused the Ofcom problems, many of the last Ofcom "in breach" rulings were caused by incompetent staff . They were found in breach for live girls going topless from 9pm to 9.30pm, they were also found in breach for showing full screen adverts of topless girls between 9pm and 9.30pm, STD 66 admitted this was wrong and against the rules, they put it down to human error, this wasn't a case of pushing things it was a error made by incompetent staff .

STD 66 was also found in breach for advertising pics and vids that people downloaded to their mobile phones that were R18 in nature, this is not just against Ofcom rules it's against UK laws (i think), they carried on advertising these pic/vids even when Ofcom told them not to, apparently they told Ofcom they hadn't had time to change the adverts and downloads etc, or something like that so Ofcom found them in breach . No member of the public or a rival channel grassed up STD 66 concerning the explicit pic/vids, Ofcom themselves saw the adverts and downloaded a pic/vid themselves .

After being found in breach they continued to advertise and send R18 style pic/vids to mobile phones, (Ofcom checked) once again Ofcom investigated them and found them in breach for a second time for the same thing, STD 66 admitted they had broken the rules and once again told Ofcom it was human error.

Much of the Ofcom stuff concerning STD 66 is nothing to do with the girls performances, it's been caused by incompetent people behind the scenes making fuck ups, it could easily have been avoided .

The latest Ofcom investigation concerning something STD 66 did on the 17/04/13 looks like it wasn't anything to do with the girls being to explicit etc, Ofcom do not say if it was done on the night show, early morning show or day show, they put the program names as "various", so i assume they have once again been advertising something on screen on early mornings, days and nights that is against the rules, if this is the case then STD 66 a fucking stupid and incompetent, these idiots will cause the death of this channel if they aren't careful .

^^^ Well said. Someone posted a photo here recently of the S66 staff - they looked exactly as I'd imagined (arrogant!).

I think what the boss's at this channel don't seem to realise is that they can't copy what Babestation does.

Babestation has a Dutch Licence so hence Ofcom are unable to target them for selling R18 material on their channel. Like I said I never did think that Ofcom were investigating them for anything that the models actually did onscreen.

With regards to last nights show, what can you say, in Jennifer Jade they have finally brought in somebody who understands exactly how to deliver a nightshow. Jennifer Jade carried the whole channel last night in my opinion because to be brutally honest the rest of them were average.

A lot of fans of this channel like to have a dig at Babestation, well when you see one thats rolled straight off the talent conveybelt at that channel then maybe they ought to show more respect towards BS.

Can I suggest that they send a few more to Babestation bootcamp in order that they to have the same understanding and vision as Jennifer Jade clearly had last night. Her performance last night was light years ahead of the rest who appeared to be yet again going through the motions with that look on their face that suggests that they were once more counting down the clock until home time.

Full praise to Jennifer Jade last night, the others please take note

I think when three other channels are doing handthong, and Studio 66 isn't, that it's another reason why they are behind at times.

As I have mentioned in another post, I have no real favourites between the big three channels, and personally I dont see any of the channels being really worse or better. I think a couple of the girls (Dionne Daniels and Emma Ashley) at 66 are lazy and should not be there, but tbh thats about it.

As JJ showed last night, S66 clearly let the girls do their own thing, it just depends on the girl. I flick thru the channels, and if you took the 2 lazy girls out of the picture, there really is nothing between the channels. Some people on these forums obviously have their favourite channels, but as a neutral point of view, I think that all the channels work to Ofcom rules, it just depends how good the model is in relation to how fun the show is.

Also I know that Babestaion come under a dutch licence, rather than ofcom, but tbh I dont think in reality that I have seen any more nudity on there than RLC or S66 (subject to the different models obviously). Infact I find it quite amusing, because the Babestaion forums think Lori's hand thongs are awesome, but if you go to the Babestation X forums, then she gets a much tougher ride. Just shows how opinions vary.

Bottom line all the 3 channels do show nudity, but none can show as much as we would all like to see. I have seen hand panties on all 3 sites too. However I do accept that each has its own style, but I just dont seem to see the huge difference in strength and nudity that most here seem to see........

(26-05-2013 16:52 )saviour123 Wrote:  Also I know that Babestaion come under a dutch licence, rather than ofcom, but tbh I dont think in reality that I have seen any more nudity on there than RLC or S66

Bottom line all the 3 channels do show nudity, but none can show as much as we would all like to see. I have seen hand panties on all 3 sites too. However I do accept that each has its own style, but I just dont seem to see the huge difference in strength and nudity that most here seem to see........

The bottom line is BS from what iv'e seen do go slightly further when naked and when using the hand thong, any Ofcom regulated channel that lets their girls do the hand thong and the girls makes contact with her bits runs the risk of Ofcom finding them in breach, the girls can shield themselves only but not make contact, how the BS girls do it would probabley be breaking Ofcom rules if they weren't Dutch regulated, if STD 66 girls do the same as BS girls then STD 66 could end up further in the shit than they are now concerning Ofcom .

Check out this post by chilly concerning nudity and the hand thong .

(15-10-2012 15:49 )Chilly Wrote:  [



Ofcom's regulation of the babe channels tells you all you need to know, which means they'd more than likely view it (hand thong) as being 'sex material'.

I don't think the STD 66 people know what the rules are half the time, that's why they keep getting in trouble with Ofcom , there's no point trying to do what BS does with their Dutch licence if you are regulated by Ofcom, it'll just end in tears if they do and put a big smile on Ofcom's face .

{edit}
Storm were actually found in breach if i remember correctly for a girl doing what the BS girls do and making contact while doing the hand thong .

Thanks for the above post, and I take your point, although I personally dont think I have seen anymore of the models body on babestaion than the other channels.On RLC the girls often go nude and stand facing the camera, with just their legs together, almost what you would call playboy nudity, and S66 seems to have more see thru pants than the other 2 channels. Bottom line, and tecnicalities aside, being a real channel switcher, I personally dont see the difference. Also, lets face it, hand thongs tend to cover as much as real thongs anyway, in my view.

Basically i guess if you break it down they all handle the rules in their own way, but lets face it, none show pussy due to ofcom.

Dont get me wrong, I love Babestaion, I just dont see the big differences that I read about. Also as a side note. One of the best peerformances in my view on BS is Lolly, and ironically as an ex hardcore porn star, is one of the few girls that will NOT remove her knickers. But.... on a good night, i see more of her bits, than Loris, due to how incredibly small Lolly's thongs are! (or maybe Lori just has big hands)

My final point is to say that I still think a lot of it depends on the model. As we all know Daryl Morgan is a long time BS girl, but lets face it.... could not get tamer if you tried. If it was all down to the channel, then why was JJ naked and covered in oil last night at S66, just as she was at RLC and Babestaion, yet Daryl shows very little? Also Savanah (formerly Rochelle), used to spend 90% of her time with a hand thong when she was on RLC a few months back. No different than her Babestaion shows now...... Conclusion: Its the girls, not the channel imho....