blackjaques
Senior Poster
Posts: 358
Joined: Feb 2010
Reputation: 11
|
RE: BabestationX & Live Shows - Chat & Discussion
(16-06-2013 15:42 )sierraman Wrote: personally im a big supporter of bsx when its at best.i really want to see it develop into the x station that its shown it has the potential to turn into, have its own identity and do really well.i hate the thought of it being sabotaged by some girls from the babestation mainstream station that have no intention of putting on x rated live shows.dread that its gonna end up as a pissing about extension of freeview with people hero worshipping their little favorites as though they are some latter day greek goddesses.stunners like ms Lorenzo,little and solis,amongst others, have all spread wide,so lets have all the girls doing the same or staying on freeview.if people look at the posts they will see I rarely post on freeview threads despite my low opinions of SOME of the babes.i really do wish people would post on here to try and develop this x station and not water it down.dont be so selfish.theres tons of freeview type stuff for you to drool over.try a peep at some of the other freeview stations,theres some right stunners writhing about naked.please leave one station for people like me that love to see spread pussy.even better if its sometimes being toyed,lubed.or worked by another babe.tonight,what do I hope to see?wide open pussy and pink!! i love it.is it possible?sure it is!!!quite a few gorgeous babes on here have proved it!!!!
Good call, Sir.
I am not someone who watches the babe channels in free but would love to see erotic entertainment on an R18 scale on the X channel.
Cellcast themselves are still wary, I feel, of Ofcon. Yes, they have a Dutch licence but, if it got too raunchy and Ofcon got to hear about it, they would be contacting Cellcast to get the broadcasts toned down (under the guise of child protection).
I may watch tonight if I get the chance. I am willing to pay good money for proper erotic entertainment.
Btw, Ofcon can go and fuck themselves. (reverting to type there).
|
|
16-06-2013 18:32 |
|
mr mystery
Account closed by request
Posts: 5,798
Joined: Sep 2009
|
RE: BabestationX & Live Shows - Chat & Discussion
Iv'e changed my opinion a little about BSX, at one time i would have had a right good rant if they put girls on that didn't spread their legs full frontal, but not any longer, i like to see good explicit shows with the girls pushing things to the max, but i don't mind occasionally paying to see tamer shows like what Charlie and Tammy and Stevie put on, these girls aren't porn stars and they do show their pussy's, they do show more than what can be seen on non encrypted tv, i don't mind occasionally paying to see girls going further than they usually do .
IMO they should mainly put the girls on that do the explicit shows with a occasional show for the girls that are less explicit as long as they do show the goods to some extent, but in my view there's no place for girls like Geri or Lori who don't show their pussy's .
BS need to remember that people pay to see the show, so imo they should get to see girls doing more than they do for free on a regular channel .
Life is short . Break the rules, Forgive quickly, Kiss slowly, Love truly, Laugh uncontrollably, and never regret anything that made you smile .
(This post was last modified: 16-06-2013 19:19 by mr mystery.)
|
|
16-06-2013 19:14 |
|
cwpussylover
Banned
Posts: 6,421
Joined: May 2009
|
RE: BabestationX & Live Shows - Chat & Discussion
|
|
16-06-2013 19:39 |
|
gtheboy
Sin Binned
Posts: 98
Joined: Feb 2013
Reputation: 5
|
RE: BabestationX & Live Shows - Chat & Discussion
(16-06-2013 19:14 )mr mystery Wrote: Iv'e changed my opinion a little about BSX, at one time i would have had a right good rant if they put girls on that didn't spread their legs full frontal, but not any longer, i like to see good explicit shows with the girls pushing things to the max, but i don't mind occasionally paying to see tamer shows like what Charlie and Tammy and Stevie put on, these girls aren't porn stars and they do show their pussy's, they do show more than what can be seen on non encrypted tv, i don't mind occasionally paying to see girls going further than they usually do .
IMO they should mainly put the girls on that do the explicit shows with a occasional show for the girls that are less explicit as long as they do show the goods to some extent, but in my view there's no place for girls like Geri or Lori who don't show their pussy's .
BS need to remember that people pay to see the show, so imo they should get to see girls doing more than they do for free on a regular channel .
Why do you say that ? They show more than unencrypted channels mate.?
Have you ever watched freeview, channel 11,Channel 4,
Film 4,or many more so called land TV shows.
Lots of these channels show more explicit scenes than this channel (charges you to watch)
They may be running scared of Ofcom,but lets face it,they do bugger all to challenge Ofcom and if they keep getting away with the drivel that they are showing,then they will of course carry on with it.
(This post was last modified: 16-06-2013 21:06 by gtheboy.)
|
|
16-06-2013 21:04 |
|