mrmann
Posting Machine
Posts: 15,880
Joined: May 2009
Reputation: 92
|
RE: Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion
(18-07-2013 15:19 )loveass Wrote: Going to be controversial here I dont like her very much. And she dose not seem a very nice person I understand that you want to keep your life apart but to be honest if it bothers you that much find alternative employment.
I don't know her personally, but she seems to lack some common sense if she thinks her naughty identity will be a secret forever. She's on live TV, does website work, has nude photoshoots in London locations, parties at clubs with strippers/babe channel women/escorts, yet she gets nervous about her Twitter???
Also, she Tweets plenty of naughty comments ("I need to pull my finger out" comment) and some naughty pics (she's topless and nude on her profile page), so I don't get this.
Also, she's somewhat shallow of she only wants people with perfect bodies to wear revealing outfits, as one of her recent comments suggest. I'd hate to go to a nude beach with her, or would I?...LOL
(This post was last modified: 18-07-2013 16:41 by mrmann.)
|
|
18-07-2013 16:20 |
|
Ree's No.1 fan
But not exclusively
Posts: 2,936
Joined: Nov 2009
Reputation: 79
|
RE: Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion
It seems to me that Clare is in an ambiguous situation in relation to her use of social media, work and personal life. When it comes to Twitter the solution seems to be to have a model account for her fans with a personal account with protected tweets for her friends and family. Alternatively, don't have a model account if you want to protect your work from friends and family.
Clare is quite prone to the odd rant on Twitter - some more justified than others in my humble opinion - that can be quite entertaining. I think it is probably reasonable to assume that while Clare is a stunningly beautiful woman, she's not a perfect human being when it comes to some of her attitudes and opinions.
Clare, along with many other performers, faces the dilemmas of doing a relatively well paid job that is based on exploiting her looks and sexuality in order to gratify men's masturbatory fantasies. That is the fact of the matter and it is her choice whether or not to enter and continue in this line of work. She's not a porn star, she's not a prostitute but I believe that she would be classed as a sex worker and so it wouldn't be straightforward if she wanted a job working with children and young people in a school.
Clare may want to keep her work relatively low profile but this is relatively unlikely to happen hence the odd rant that she has on Twitter. Personally, I think she's entitled to do this but it is the equivalent of asking water to run uphill.
The questions we need to ask include:
Does she have a right to privacy?
Is she entitled to comment on other people's internet posts?
At the end of the day, does it really matter?
Anyway, I thought Clare looked as good as ever last night and personally I hope she continues to entertain us for a long time yet!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ree Petra was very dirty...but also very clean!
|
|
19-07-2013 11:06 |
|