DrGrumpyPants
Account closed
Posts: 1,845
Joined: Jan 2009
|
RE: Babestation on Freeview channel 33
yeah thats what i mean they got enough girls to cover 3 channels maybe if they had 2 girls a channel. thats what bang babes do they had or they could mix and match so they wouldnt lose breaks they just need to use the assets more wisely.
when party girls was on they would mix and match girls some nights so whay cant they do that again that way could keep freeview seperate and wouldnt alienate the sky audience
or why dont they do the sex station route and have hourly sessions. the old babestation im sure did that.
(This post was last modified: 14-05-2009 12:20 by DrGrumpyPants.)
|
|
14-05-2009 12:16 |
|
silverknight
Junior Poster
Posts: 89
Joined: May 2009
Reputation: 5
|
RE: Babestation on Freeview channel 33
Dreamlander Wrote:The nudity,or lack of it,is all down to the fact that they are on Freeview.Cellcast are the only broadcaster on unencrypted Freeview and that must mean that the people giving out the 'licences' are reasonably happy with the content of their channels and that PG was just a one off that we are all grateful for.
The frustrating thing for Sky viewers is when that Freeview content is mirrored on the Sky channels and the censorship is not equal to that of the Freeview channels.This is obviously a cost saving exercise and in the current climate is understandable,especially by me. I haven't spent a single penny on any Cellcast channel ever but have seen gorgeous girls on my TV for nothing since day one.It's similar.I suppose,to complaining about how the government are running the country but never actually voting.
Cellcast will do whatever it can to make a profit and keep it's channels from having fines or being removed altogether which I am OK with.Certain things they,and other broadcasters,do frustrate and annoy me at times but I have to remind myself that it is free to watch and preferable to all the soaps,reality garbage and dire news we have as an 'alternative'
Dreamlander
As PartyGirls (channel 46) was shown on Freeview which included moderate adult content (tight panties, close-up shots, boobs, ass, open legs and oil) I can't see why the same thing can't be included on Babestation (channel 33).
The Babestation producers need to stop messing around and decide whether they are going to broadcast a good 18+ adult show (what we all want to watch) or broadcast a show that bores us all to sleep! If we just wanted to see a girl laying around in underwear doing nothing we'd just flick through the underwear section of a mail order catalogue!
|
|
14-05-2009 16:18 |
|
Dreamlander
.
Posts: 1,773
Joined: Dec 2008
|
RE: Babestation on Freeview channel 33
It's different channels and I'm sure it's different licences/contracts etc.Whatever we want to see doesn't really matter.Cellcast will do what it has to to keep the channel on the air and broadcasting.It's the only way I can explain why the same girl on the same night can take most of her clothes of on Sky and then remain clothed for most of the time that the broadcast is on the Freeview channel.For once I am sure this is out of Cellcast's control and they are just 'towing the line'
Dreamlander
|
|
14-05-2009 17:57 |
|