Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

(11-10-2013 21:18 )D T Wrote:  Lolly has been doing one or two days a week since the move, mostly one day a week, hardly a "usual suspect"

have to agree now D T these days lolly isn't a usual suspect since the move, but was in the past

(11-10-2013 22:29 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  

(11-10-2013 21:18 )D T Wrote:  Lolly has been doing one or two days a week since the move, mostly one day a week, hardly a "usual suspect"

have to agree now D T these days lolly isn't a usual suspect since the move, but was in the past

anyway i preferred the pre-boob job lolly to the present lolly.....and she is still on more than some girls.

Of course some girls are on more than other girls. Go back over the years and that has always been the case on all the channels.
Both Lolly and Lori have not been on as much recently, having 4 or so nights off over the course of a week. Preeti, Danni and Beth have been on a lot recently and Louise has been on more regularly and fair enough if they are in demand.
The fact is people moan when it is a girl they personally do not care for but keep quiet when it is one they do like. As ever it would be interesting to know how many people actually call the shows or buy photos (ie. the people who play a big part in determining how frequently a girl appears) as opposed to those who simply watch and expect.

wouldn't say Louise Porter has been on more recently. she's only on 2 shows a week and that has been the case for a while now

last nights freeview viewing was interesting,bs1 had the 4 usual suspects dominating this channel,but got disturbed for about 30 minutes by leigh near the end..bsextra was totally dominated by the usual suspects with no show from kimber/leigh andd finally bs blue should really should have been a kimber/leigh all nighter..but no that too was invaded by the usuals,so in a total of 17.5 hours viewing spread over 3 channels,the usuals had roughly 14.5 of the 17.5 hours available.

(12-10-2013 09:35 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  wouldn't say Louise Porter has been on more recently. she's only on 2 shows a week and that has been the case for a while now

No I meant she is on more regularly than she used to be, not that she is on too much. At one time, a couple of years ago she seemed to be used almost as a filler between other girls' stints.

(12-10-2013 10:03 )davetherave57 Wrote:  last nights freeview viewing was interesting,bs1 had the 4 usual suspects dominating this channel,but got disturbed for about 30 minutes by leigh near the end..bsextra was totally dominated by the usual suspects with no show from kimber/leigh andd finally bs blue should really should have been a kimber/leigh all nighter..but no that too was invaded by the usuals,so in a total of 17.5 hours viewing spread over 3 channels,the usuals had roughly 14.5 of the 17.5 hours available.

That's just over one night though, what about over the course of a week? Or a month? Might get a truer picture then.

Certain babes may get more screen time even then, but the argument is incomplete until we know why? They've got the stats & we haven't, all we have is personal favoritism for babes. For example if a girl earns more a minute revenue for the company than another then wouldn't they be entitled to be on more?

Currently babestation is just holding back the women on their channel except for Lori, Preeti and Lolly. If you're a fan of one of those girls then you probably don't have much to complain about but if you're a Tiffany fan especially then the channel at the moment is just a hindrance on certain babes.

This was made even clearer to meet last night while watching Tori Lee over on Studio 66 and Charlene Hart over on Red Light Central. After Tori arrived at babestation I quickly lost interest in her but last night i was glued to the screen, no OSG's no one interrupting, no having to limit her performance so that the channel could sell some shitty £3 video! she was just put on screen and left to do her thing. The same with Charlene Hart who I don't think i saw topless once while at babestation but that was a different story as soon as she moved channels.

I've every confidence that if Tiffany was to change channels we would get the old fun and sexy Tiffany back who blew all our minds with her amazing performances but while she's on 'The Lori, Preeti, Jada and Lolly Show' she's going nowhere.

(12-10-2013 11:54 )KerrAvon Wrote:  That's just over one night though, what about over the course of a week? Or a month? Might get a truer picture then.

Certain babes may get more screen time even then, but the argument is incomplete until we know why? They've got the stats & we haven't, all we have is personal favoritism for babes. For example if a girl earns more a minute revenue for the company than another then wouldn't they be entitled to be on more?

the fanfare they made when georgies sister leigh :-) came to babestation,made it sound like she would be the channel saviour,in retrospect she has hardly been used and last night was the proof in the pudding,1short stint on bs extra,a short 241 on blue followed by a 30 minute solo on blue.

leigh darby is georgie darby's sister??? where have you got that from. they don't look like each other and they are from different parts of the country

yes babestation do give certain babeshow babes more screentime than others which can be annoying, but that's probably because they make bs the most money. regarding Leigh Darby, think she has done well since joining bs and if she carries on doing well, the more screentime she'll get. so far though overall she's had a good amount of screentime on bs