BabestationX & Live Shows - Chat & Discussion

(23-11-2013 08:19 )Broncobilly Wrote:  Surly bsx can only hurt the babes taking part its supposed to be hard core but is not. At some point people stop watching babes associated with lies?

I was watching the cricket so I didn't see any of this show, but how is it supposed to be hardcore when hardcore isn't allowed on British TV?

(23-11-2013 12:06 )William H Bonney Wrote:  

(23-11-2013 08:19 )Broncobilly Wrote:  Surly bsx can only hurt the babes taking part its supposed to be hard core but is not. At some point people stop watching babes associated with lies?

I was watching the cricket so I didn't see any of this show, but how is it supposed to be hardcore when hardcore isn't allowed on British TV?

no,its the hardcore of fans that watch it.......

(23-11-2013 09:36 )Grawth Wrote:  

(23-11-2013 01:24 )cwpussylover Wrote:  they are allowed to show pussy......SO THEY MUST AT LEAST SHOW PUSSY

They did.

They just didn't show it being spread or rubbed, which is about where they got to before they stopped a few months back.

It's a shame that the dildo sections were faked - don't get me wrong I know they can't SHOW it sliding in and out, but there is nothing wrong with the action being real and the camera angle being carefully chosen. It rather ruins the moment when the action is supposedly one girl plunging a dildo into the other, but you can clearly see the end of the dildo rubbing somewhere near her knee!

the dildos were show clearly entering bith girls , on the web stream at 10pm, I think they just had to tone it down for the Freeview.

and sexstation etc are web based. if they were TV, they'd have to tone it down aswell.

I agree, faking it is not good, better to not try faking it at all, or just hide the real deal.

(23-11-2013 11:46 )pb.78 Wrote:  "Sex shows" just don't work on freeview and never will with all the restrictions that are in place.

Much better just to go back to solo shows in my opinion.

think I agree, given freeview limits
or maybe
G on G at 10pm to 12 on the webstream, then from midnight, the two girls take turns as solos, on the freeview?

(23-11-2013 11:41 )davetherave57 Wrote:  Going by the first and very soon might be the last live/bsx,to say it was tame would be an understatement,the fake dialogue between dionne & leigh was comical,as for the filler it has all been seen at numerous times,and was it worth the £5 viewing on freeview price,a big emphatic NO,very soon at this rate the viewing figures wil be a single number......unless they get the likes of Tori/Daisy,appearing which is highly unlikely

the fake dialogue is a big turn off. agreed
was it worth £5 ??
which idiot pays £5?
in the website, you can have two nights for £1.50 !

(22-11-2013 23:17 )davetherave57 Wrote:  surely its not £5 to watch bsx on freeview,well thats what it is saying on the red button?????

on the website, you can get 2 nights for £1.50

The cameramen on freeview all have pussyphobia - rushing to move away from any action as soon as they can.

If you are a fan of shots of heads, backs or even backs of heads then this is the channel for you, but if you want anything more then surf the web for free

(23-11-2013 14:58 )billyboy1963 Wrote:  The cameramen on freeview all have pussyphobia - rushing to move away from any action as soon as they can.

If you are a fan of shots of heads, backs or even backs of heads then this is the channel for you, but if you want anything more then surf the web for free

you could actually hear someone in the background giving cam man directions.

(23-11-2013 13:27 )welshken Wrote:  which idiot pays £5?

That would be people like me who want to watch and record from the telly.

The Dionne/Leigh show was disappointing. The lighting was poor, the roving camera was irritating and as already mentioned the aspect ratio of the picture was wrong. The most serious flaw, however, was that there just wasn't enough fanny.
The recording of Brook was easily the best thing on the broadcast.