BabestationX & Live Shows - Chat & Discussion

A very good show from Beth on bsx last night.
She was looking gorgeous and full of energy as always

I haven't tuned into freeview 174 for a while now.wanted to support the channel and get enjoyment out of it.this forum seems extremely quiet which leads me to believe they are still showing the same tame pussy closed material interspersed with the same complete pre-recorded crap that they were showing the last time I paid to view.looks like 3 attractive liveshow girls tonight but im not risking it.will keep my eyes on this forum in case reports start coming on that 174 has got itself organised and is starting to show allowable material that is more befitting a pay to view encrypted channel.

(07-02-2014 16:14 )sierraman Wrote:  I haven't tuned into freeview 174 for a while now.wanted to support the channel and get enjoyment out of it.this forum seems extremely quiet ....will keep my eyes on this forum in case reports start coming on that 174 has got itself organised and is starting to show allowable material that is more befitting a pay to view encrypted channel.

Good comment. Not watched 174 much myself recently, but seems to me all the forum "buzz" lately is around the rebranded "Unleashed" channel - I find it hard to see how tame pay-per-view BSX is going to get people - (other than those without access to the webstreams) - paying for their much softer stuff on 174 than viewers can now see on "Unleashed" on the web, esp. as the latter is using popular ladies like Beth and Sami J.

So far so good webstream seems much better tonight

wow those 3 girls are so hot together, and none of them has big fake balloon tits - result.

fair comment but it applies to web only.its a pity theres not a separate thread so that the channel that people pay a fiver for on freeview 174 carries its own comments.obviously people wouldn't expect it to be as strong as the web show but at the moment is so tame as to have little attraction to people like me who like a bit of tease and foreplay but do need it to at least show a bit of pink to justify its billing as a pay to view encrypted channel.tonights freeview girls were being advertised for the freeview section as having no boundaries.really? why do the producers on174 keep showing the backs of heads then or shots of the studio walls every time theres any chance of liveshow performers meaningfully touching each other or showing a bit of open pussy?

(07-02-2014 23:44 )sierraman Wrote:  fair comment but it applies to web only.its a pity theres not a separate thread so that the channel that people pay a fiver for on freeview 174 carries its own comments.obviously people wouldn't expect it to be as strong as the web show but at the moment is so tame as to have little attraction to people like me who like a bit of tease and foreplay but do need it to at least show a bit of pink to justify its billing as a pay to view encrypted channel.tonights freeview girls were being advertised for the freeview section as having no boundaries.really? why do the producers on174 keep showing the backs of heads then or shots of the studio walls every time theres any chance of liveshow performers meaningfully touching each other or showing a bit of open pussy?

It's daft though, isn't it. The censorship, I mean.

There is far less censorship on the web yet Ofcon insist on censoring the TV output.
Makes you think that it's never been about child protection at all; all about not offending certain adult groups.

brilliantly said blackjaques.add to that the many cases of adulterous,inappropriate and so on copulence that has come to light over the last few years in public office between ranges of people from politicians to high ranking public servants of all descriptions and denominations.not to mention the inappropriate misuse and fraud of public funds. then it really does make the blood boil to think that responsible adults cant spend a bit of their hard earned money on informed adult, encrypted,late at night, choices that would never be seen by children,or wished by the purchasers to ever be seen by children.yep,a stronger babestation x would offend no one as children wouldn't be anywhere near it and those that did not wish to purchase would have no compulsion to do so.some of them would probably be too busy shagging each other behind closed doors instead of getting on fully with the responsible jobs that the taxpayers or employers were paying them so well to do.

remember the man who took a porn film company to court because a film he bought wasnt as strong as shown on the box? he won the case and the porn company were done under the trade description act.........now that has given me an idea

One good thing about BSX at the moment, is listening to antipodean Beth trying to pronounce it when she's having to give it a plug.

Bee Iss Icks