Studio 66 - Can it get any worse?

anyway apart from that it's been a good night on S66

Is that so? Apart from complaining about the lighting on this channel what else do you consider as abuse?

(27-07-2014 00:49 )Broncobilly Wrote:  

(27-07-2014 00:39 )peter rock Wrote:  

(27-07-2014 00:35 )Broncobilly Wrote:  Peter is obviously a hired goon

Thanks for the abuse. You're obviously skilled at making someone feel welcome.

Oh it's nothing personal, but we tell it like it is, when the channels mess up we call it. Your better to accept the mistake instead of trying to defend it or saying it's something else than what it is.

how can s66 have messed up tonight. tori black isn't/wasn't on for whatever reason so s66 sorted out kalina ryu as cover.

also peter rock is entitled to his opinion, no need to call him a goon and insist your right and he is wrong and he has to accept what youre saying

The lighting could definitely be improved but the biggest single thing to help matters would be the phasing out of bed set stints. Bed sets are unbelievably tedious 99% of the time.
Same old positions and poses and quite honestly an excuse to lie there and phone wave .

Let Peter answer for himself please Rammy thank you.

(27-07-2014 00:40 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  here you go tori's tweet

Quote:Tori Black ‏@misstoriblack · Jul 25
!thanks babe! On again next week!

haven't a clue why s66 didn't take her off the schedule. glad your happy with the apparent comedy gold I've apparently and ill thank you in turn for your latest play of your s66usa record you always play whenever there is no s66usa show and should be taken off air.

s66 hasn't self destructed tonight as you say it has and will always say it has, especially when there is no s66usa show. for me it's the channel of the night tonight with both kandi and Olivia on fantastic form including going naked and unleashing the oil being the highlights

So now you've sunk to quoting a tweet that the tweeter herself has since chosen to delete from her account (that's if she ever tweeted it at all)

And while we're at it, although I'm usually very keen on oil-shows and acknowledged a few posts ago Kandi's valiant use of it tonight, I just don't rate Olivia at all regardless of whether she's drenched in the slippery stuff or not.

Next to no give in her tits amid the overall impression she's trying ever so hard to be sexy rather than having the naturally confident sexiness I enjoy from plenty of others.

Always flick to another channel when Olivia's on at least one of them, never mind tonight's 2-at-a-time or sometimes even 3-at-a-time.

(27-07-2014 01:06 )whangie Wrote:  So now you've sunk to quoting a tweet that the tweeter herself has since chosen to delete from her account (that's if she ever tweeted it at all)

pipe down

https://twitter.com/misstoriblack/status...6302033920

I haven't sunk to what you say I have whangie because....the tweet that tori tweeted is still there!!!!!!!!!!!!

you can always guarantee one thing. Rammy(studio66exec)rascal will be getting trolled by others in this thread

It's never dull. Unlike studio66

(27-07-2014 01:06 )whangie Wrote:  So now you've sunk to quoting a tweet that the tweeter herself has since chosen to delete from her account (that's if she ever tweeted it at all)

And while we're at it, although I'm usually very keen on oil-shows and acknowledged a few posts ago Kandi's valiant use of it tonight, I just don't rate Olivia at all regardless of whether she's drenched in the slippery stuff or not.

Next to no give in her tits amid the overall impression she's trying ever so hard to be sexy rather than having the naturally confident sexiness I enjoy from plenty of others.

Always flick to another channel when Olivia's on at least one of them, never mind tonight's 2-at-a-time or sometimes even 3-at-a-time.

So now you've sunk to singling out a girl that you personally don't like as a way of furthering your argument? I can't decide whether that's nit-picking or clutching at straws?