XtremeFilth - General Chat & Discussion

(19-09-2014 13:14 )admiral decker Wrote:  Yes, that's correct, the show is clearly an independent production.

What's your point?

You cannot use the word independent because they don't have ultimate control of what we view, possibly pedantic but true. They are not completely free from outside control ie S66.

Winsaw, like me, believes S66 have a greater involvement still, and seeing them swap girls is a good indicator this may be true, that is the only point - despite what has previously been said.

Yes I know the swap could go down as simply a link (which obviously they have) , but to use the word independent strikes a different meaning altogether.

I thought I'd chip in because I know you love word games Admiral

I hope this 'borrowing of babes' from S66 continues once their hardcore webshow starts.
Hannah Martin, Cara Brett, Abbey B are just a few i'd like to see.

Well we are all allowed to dream!

(19-09-2014 13:42 )Bandwagon Wrote:  Winsaw, like me, believes S66 have a greater involvement still

Winsaw, like you, is a fantasist.

If he believes that XtremeFilth borrowing one of Studio 66's girls is proof of his theories he is certainly fantasising. Either that or he misunderstands the meaning of the word proof.

The only known facts are that one of last night's girls pulled out at short notice and a Studio 66 girl ended up taking her place. That's all.

And her appearance wouldn't have been paid for by Studio 66.

(19-09-2014 13:42 )Bandwagon Wrote:  Winsaw, like me, believes S66 have a greater involvement still...

Greater involvement? That's an understatement, Bandwagon. XtremeFilth is little more than S66 under a different name. It's as plain as the nose on your face!

In terms of a show name, they should never have gone near words like '(E)Xtreme' or 'Filth' (I'd like the latter completely banished for other reasons, but I'm not going into that, here). The content of the show, however, has been sporadically good, and it's good to see Crystal Pink back on a show.

(19-09-2014 14:14 )JuanKerr Wrote:  Greater involvement? That's an understatement, Bandwagon.

I was trying not to use anything too strong for the Admiral Juan, he will bombard it with facts and figures

(19-09-2014 14:07 )admiral decker Wrote:  Either that or he misunderstands the meaning of the word proof.

if i am misunderstands the meaning of the word proof then you are clearly misunderstands the meaning of the word independent, i have shown the definition of independent below to help you

independent
ɪndɪˈpɛnd(ə)nt/
adjective
adjective: independent

1.
free from outside control; not subject to another's authority.

2.
not depending on another for livelihood or subsistence.

synonyms: self-sufficient, self-supporting, self-sustaining, self-reliant, self-standing, able to stand on one's own two feet; More

i think you will have to agree that XF dose not fit the above

(19-09-2014 15:04 )winsaw Wrote:  i think you will have to agree that XF dose not fit the above

The show is independently produced. That does not mean the channel itself is independent.

(19-09-2014 14:07 )admiral decker Wrote:  

(19-09-2014 13:42 )Bandwagon Wrote:  Winsaw, like me, believes S66 have a greater involvement still

Winsaw, like you, is a fantasist.

Time out........... One point deducted for a low blow by Mr Decker ..................continue

when does the webshow start?