Red Light Central - Chat & Discussion

we are working on new and hopfully shorter and less intrusive ads

(27-10-2014 15:15 )winsaw Wrote:  

(27-10-2014 01:50 )TURNIPHEAD Wrote:  I expect that the members who do not object to the adverts are not regular callers to RLC just SKY viewers or as some people call freeloaders.
Without the telephone callers there will be no RLC .
I am not going to call again to be interrupted in my final moments of passion by the f---ing adverts.
So in the future I will be a viewer/freeloader until RLC goes BUST , if more callers like me stop phoning the girls because of the adverts

my guess would be that RLC are learning how to do the adds, in the future i would expect the adds to be shown between calls, RLC have said the adds will be shorter so will be easier to fit them in, so here's hoping as i don't think any one wants a channel to fail

^^^^While you're doing that why not try and bring back some 241 action and generally improve the overall quality and content of the shows.
You have talented girls by the bucketload on your channels, so why not use them instead of handicapping them with castrated,eunuch producers and useless cameramen. At one time your channel was great but now it's just a pale shadow of what it once was.

Sort it out!!!!

I'm pretty sure it's not just me that absolutely loved the whole behind the door thing Dannii Harwood did a few times. However I don't think she's done it at all the whole of 2014 and I'd love if it could be brought back with not just Dannii but other girls too like Jenna Hoskins or Jennifer Jade, etc.

(28-10-2014 12:39 )redlight central Wrote:  we are working on new and hopfully shorter and less intrusive ads

Thank you for your attention to the matter. I'm sure that you can get the message across in less than 30 seconds.

(29-10-2014 03:55 )t-belltosin Wrote:  I'm pretty sure it's not just me that absolutely loved the whole behind the door thing Dannii Harwood did a few times. However I don't think she's done it at all the whole of 2014 and I'd love if it could be brought back with not just Dannii but other girls too like Jenna Hoskins or Jennifer Jade, etc.

i am pretty sure ofcom banned these type of shows, even though you could not see anything they said the show was to sexual and that it was simulating sex

(29-10-2014 03:55 )t-belltosin Wrote:  I'm pretty sure it's not just me that absolutely loved the whole behind the door thing Dannii Harwood did a few times. However I don't think she's done it at all the whole of 2014 and I'd love if it could be brought back with not just Dannii but other girls too like Jenna Hoskins or Jennifer Jade, etc.

The RLC Channel got into big trouble with OFCOM over Dannii's 'Doorgate' performance. You can read the OFCOM report (references can be found elsewhere on this board) I believe that the show Producer was sacked to placate the regulator.

I agree that it was a great shame that we can't see such an exciting and original performance (very realistic and convincing at times!) again.

RLC is now just the Pantomime channel with fancy dress costumes, over elaborate sets and decent Babes directed to giving static uninteresting performances by over cautious producers.

^^^^ Well said

This is not a criticism of Ani James because I think she is excellent, always putting on great shows, but RLC now only have 3 channels and Ani has been on 3 nights in a row. Where have all the girls gone?

(29-10-2014 11:09 )winsaw Wrote:  i am pretty sure ofcom banned these type of shows, even though you could not see anything they said the show was to sexual and that it was simulating sex

Isn't the whole idea behind these shows simulating sex? If anything doing it behind the door covers half of her body and makes it less sexual does it not?

Bloody Ofcom, honestly I don't understand how babeshows are scrutinized so much for what they air. If what Dannii did with the door for example was too sexual and offensive to some people, why the **** were they watching it in the first place? It's not as if your average babeshow viewer enjoys a good Dannii Harwood show but is then suddenly offended when she delves away from the norm, wave your ass every 5 minutes norm the shows now follow, and then reports it. Therefore, who are they protecting? I understand and agree with the current format that for hardcore content you should need a pin code, but the constant degradation and restrictions imposed on the babe channels over the years is unbelievable. I see the idea of protecting children as irrelevant as why are children watching the shows...and if the shows which are too sexual are a threat to children then no matter what the babeshows produce its going too sexual for a child, as a pair of tits is dangerous to a kid isn't it? Therefore I don't see what purpose these restrictions hold, other than old whiny bitches, jealous of the girls and subdued by their inability to find husbands as they scrounge on benefits spend their time watching the shows like a hawk to find anything they can complain about or report to ofcom.

I remember the good old days, the Emily Dean and Hazel Bond 2 4 1's, Bangbabes and The Pad (who's day shows were the equivalent of a current night show without the tits) and all the rest of it. The constant leaving the mic on, on Bangbabes was a fond memory. Days when the girls were actually allowed to move. How times have changed. I wonder if within the next 10 years Ofcom will render the sight of a woman's skin too sexual and all those on the shows must wear a burka, or be completely covered. Just a thought.

Rant over. I'm sure this has been deliberated many times on other threads and this is probably in the wrong place but...oh well...please don't move it mods

You talk about children watching the shows and the reason for that is very simple. You have to remember that on SKY the channels such as Babestation, Studio66, RLC are not parentally locked by default. Although the babe channels are rated 18 after 10pm you can still put in the channel number on your remote and it will go straight to it without any form for verification or protection. You take the movie channels on SKY, if a film is rated 12, 15 or 18 you have to enter a pin code yet with babe channels there is no protection in place whatsoever. Of course this can be changed by the owner of the SKY box, parent or guardian individually

Another point is, the webstreams of the shows are free to view by anyone again with no protection or pin code whatsoever. Again this applies to RLC, Studio66 etc. You take how many children have laptops or access to the internet and can simply go on there and see these things.

Sorry wasn't knocking what you was saying, just replying to your comment about children watching the shows