Red Light Central - Chat & Discussion

^^^^I don't know what the problem is when most kids with laptops/pc's are probably watching hard core pornography,than the tame stuff the channels put. It's only in countries like this with it's curiously prudish attitude to sex that this sort of crap happens. Compare that to countries like Holland who have a much healthier attitude to sex and you see a generally healthier populace,sexually speaking anyway.

It's laughable that a child needs protecting from a solo babe remotely stimulating a sex act on 902, when they don't need protecting from swearing & more explicit advert action of actual sex on the channel numbers adjacent to it. Purely because the child knows they're classified differently of course

But it's just as laughable the channels never challenged Ofcom on this hypocritical open goal. Surely shows Ofcom have personal business against the babe channels, when they so virtually admit being on the 900s is good enough 'protection'.

(30-10-2014 07:21 )Ex-Producer Wrote:  You talk about children watching the shows and the reason for that is very simple. You have to remember that on SKY the channels such as Babestation, Studio66, RLC are not parentally locked by default. Although the babe channels are rated 18 after 10pm you can still put in the channel number on your remote and it will go straight to it without any form for verification or protection. You take the movie channels on SKY, if a film is rated 12, 15 or 18 you have to enter a pin code yet with babe channels there is no protection in place whatsoever. Of course this can be changed by the owner of the SKY box, parent or guardian individually

Another point is, the webstreams of the shows are free to view by anyone again with no protection or pin code whatsoever. Again this applies to RLC, Studio66 etc. You take how many children have laptops or access to the internet and can simply go on there and see these things.

Sorry wasn't knocking what you was saying, just replying to your comment about children watching the shows

But the whole concept of the babe channels in general can be viewed as an issue regarding children. The issue raised by Dannii's performance with the door is children watching it, not what the performer is doing. I hardly see how her simulating sex behind a door is more dangerous to a child than her doing it without one, and that is why I'm so annoyed with the needless fines and restrictions which make no bloody sense.

Just tuned in to Dannii Harwood at 5 mins past midnight and she is still fully clothed so I am not calling and its off to bed
RLC used to be by far the best of the babe show channels but now its more like the day shows but with the boobs out
I like to see the babes in thongs and high heels
RLC you will have to up your game to get us to call

Should have checked out Ella she was stunning )

Yeah Ella was good last night. Although I didn't mind how Dannii looked either, nothing wrong seeing an office girl with her tits out lol I mean last week she had the proper latex catsuit, so nice to her change it up. The whole reason why she is fully clothed is to get punters to call to ask her to get them out and take it all off haha

(31-10-2014 00:13 )TURNIPHEAD Wrote:  I like to see the babes in thongs and high heels
RLC you will have to up your game to get us to call

both Ella and Georgie did the type of show you were looking for last night mate, so RLC are doing what you want

Hahaha yep was thongs and heels aplenty from those two

(31-10-2014 15:15 )winsaw Wrote:  

(31-10-2014 00:13 )TURNIPHEAD Wrote:  I like to see the babes in thongs and high heels
RLC you will have to up your game to get us to call

both Ella and Georgie did the type of show you were looking for last night mate, so RLC are doing what you want

But not Dannii Harwood !!!!
Ella & Georgie are not my "cup of tea"
Just personal choice

I have to agree with you on Georgie, she just doesn't attract me. Some nights you get that though, girls that you don't like and then other nights on multiple channels all your favourites are on.