mr mystery
Account closed by request
Posts: 5,798
Joined: Sep 2009
|
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion
Yes i think originally Ofcom only complained to the Dutch regulator about the BS freeview channels, basically it was about the content and the BS freeview channels starting before Ofcom rules allow UK licensed adult chat phone in babe channels to start . (I don't think they complained about the content on Sky 906)
Ofcom rules state that adult chat Phone in Babe channels can't start on freeview before 12am.
Ofcom say they asked BS to voluntarily comply with Ofcom rules, Ofcom also stated that they could take the matter to the EU courts (there is a link somewhere on this forum to this) .
This was in early 2012, BS is still breaking Ofcom rules by starting at 10pm on freeview, so it seem BS have called Ofcom's bluff .
Digital Dave posted the original topic and link about this in this post http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.ph...pid1013308
The Dutch regulator responded to the complaint by saying they were well aware of what BS were broadcasting on freeview from 10pm onwards, they said this "The Dutch legislator, hence also Nicam are of the opinion by that time children should be in bed and that adults should be able to decide what to watch and what not to watch, indeed Nicam does not participate in a discussion about morals or good taste when it comes to what adults can watch"
In other words Ofcom fuck off lol
That statement is mentioned in this link http://www.broadbandtvnews.com/2012/03/0...-channels/
Life is short . Break the rules, Forgive quickly, Kiss slowly, Love truly, Laugh uncontrollably, and never regret anything that made you smile .
(This post was last modified: 18-11-2014 19:58 by mr mystery.)
|
|
18-11-2014 15:42 |
|
Censorship :-(
Sadly, no more caps. :-(
Posts: 5,362
Joined: May 2009
Reputation: 52
|
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion
(18-11-2014 09:25 )TheProf Wrote: If BS1 does have a 'special status' with regards to censorship, then the owners are certainly wasting the opportunity to pull in the callers.
Last night, for example, featured 'usual suspect' Lori performing the same irritating routine as she has for years, and getting no callers, when they have a bunch of staff who could freshen up the channel and try more adventurous stuff!
Another Tamestation 'con'? They like to keep telling people how BS1 is more adventurous etc., yet the on-screen evidence says otherwise - they fully deserve the Tamestation moniker, IMO.
Lori is a case in point - She is one of the few babes I still have any interest in, on any of the babe channels (let's face it, 'Ofcon' has all but killed the babe channels as a whole), but she's largely unwatchable, IMO, and has been for at least the last couple of years, with these boring 'nude', no tease, non performance, no sexy outfit, identikit shows, night after night - the latest 'development' is the 'orgasm line' nonsense, with its largely static babe and largely static and deliberately censorial camera work – utter garbage, IMO. (I wonder if a move to another channel (preferably RLC) would give her a new start?)
Presumably, TS keeps so many 'waste of bandwidth' channels on FV just to stop some (relatively speaking) decent channels from getting on the platform?
|
|
19-11-2014 13:27 |
|
tudart
Newbie
Posts: 1
Joined: Nov 2014
Reputation: 0
|
Babestation - General Chat & Discussion
I wonder why this injustice, the best girls sophie parker paige are all the time on BS BLUE.
while LORI JADA are almost always BS1 (you chose the latest Babestation girls not only on earth babestation you start to piss us off, give a chance to SOPHIE PARKER BS1 especially if it was a 2 4 1 .... you'll see the result after surment
(This post was last modified: 21-11-2014 11:27 by tudart.)
|
|
21-11-2014 11:26 |
|