davetherave57
Posting Machine
Posts: 3,165
Joined: Sep 2013
Reputation: 34
|
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion
|
|
21-12-2014 22:46 |
|
M-L-L
The Last Straw
Posts: 11,146
Joined: Sep 2013
|
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion
OK, moving on from the burning questions of the moment to the mere idle speculation :
what's with the new sofa position in the boudoir set ?
Now we need a telescope to see the babes as they're forced to stand right at the back ?
There are just no positives to this situation that I can see...er.....oh...
...OK, maybe that actually works, but I still need convincing, say a good long session of Preeti doing this knickerless
Seriously I don't think it's very smart - it doesn't allow for 2-4-1s and will restrict the range of poses/movements possible generally ?
Is it intended to keep the babes on their feet ? No lying down on the job ?
|
|
21-12-2014 23:42 |
|
M-L-L
The Last Straw
Posts: 11,146
Joined: Sep 2013
|
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion
(21-12-2014 23:44 )circles_o_o_o Wrote: Was Cali wearing heels in that picture, can't believe she's that much taller than Ashley?
Honestly don't know - couldn't see her feet at all, they were always out of the frame.
Guess she must have been, either that or the set is slightly raised up or something in the corner.
Ashley does also look as if she's slightly leaning back/ "sitting" against the wall/that picture frame, so maybe that's also exaggerating the height difference.
|
|
21-12-2014 23:50 |
|
M-L-L
The Last Straw
Posts: 11,146
Joined: Sep 2013
|
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion
^ Cali has these on now...
...so if she was also wearing them earlier that probably answers the question.
EDIT : or then again, maybe not, just checked my earlier caps and found this...
This one suggests Cali was just in her stocking feet after all, no heels ? Maybe Ashley is tiny ?
Good to see Cali back and with a set to herself now but unfortunately she seems to be doing a domination show now which is not my cup of tea really.
(This post was last modified: 22-12-2014 02:08 by M-L-L.)
|
|
22-12-2014 01:41 |
|
M-L-L
The Last Straw
Posts: 11,146
Joined: Sep 2013
|
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion
OK sorry to harp on about "sofa-gate" but I see now both Cali and Ashley have been using that set and sitting on a stool right against the back wall. WTF is the point of that when there's a bloody great sofa already on the set taking up most of the space ?
So the range of movement is zero and the camera set up is consequently pretty boringly static, to avoid showing bits of the sofa in the foreground obscuring the babe.
OK - Cali's stint was supposedly one of these domination things, but Ashley's shift that's now following doesn't look like it is.
Is there something wrong with the sofa ? - has it been pushed against the wall as a temporary act of disablement : has an enthusiastically bouncing Lori or a contortingly oily Jada runined its structure and/or covers? Has there been some calamitous spillage of oil or other liquids that's rendered it unusable ?
|
|
22-12-2014 02:48 |
|
bob roberts
Senior Poster
Posts: 499
Joined: Aug 2010
Reputation: 19
|
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion
Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world she has to walk into mine!
|
|
22-12-2014 07:55 |
|