^^^ This is good, so we are getting down to brass tacks then.
So you
aren't saying then that half-naked girls with great bodies are not -- in and of themselves -- sexy and seductive. I take it we can agree then that it is
not insane for people to get off on scantily clad young hotties talking dirty to them on the phone? So the whole passage of posts above that makes it sound nonsensical for phone sex to exist in the absence of total nudity is really just a bunch of hollow rhetoric aimed at undermining things that Rammy said.
And I appreciate your concern for all of those poor misled callers who are being fooled into thinking that they might get a bit of 'action'.
(31-12-2014 01:36 )Joey 27 Wrote: so people who phone up expecting to see a pair of tits after 10pm are wasting their time and money when the model tells them she won't get her tits out whilst the girl and the channel rake it in
The concern may sound genuine in theory, but I think it is unnecessary in practice. I have spent a lot of time in those queues. I don't think I have ever heard someone frustratingly trying and failing to get a tease show girl undressed. I'm not saying it doesn't happen -- I'm just saying that it is the exception and not the rule. By and large, most callers know that it is a day girl on at night. They know who they are calling and why and what to expect. And that does NOT mean that they are talking about the weather or their latest holiday. I had a very dirty conversation with Ann last night; I just didn't waste my minutes or my money begging her to take her clothes off.
What I have heard (A LOT!) is guys being ignored by Tori Lee and guys being cut off by Cara Brett. Those guys seriously ARE getting ripped off. And there are just 3 or 4 of us crying foul about that, while the rest of the forum goes into spasms of glee at the mere sight of bare boobs.
SO...
Tits out, callers ripped off = nobody says boo and long live the Cara Brett night show, long may it continue.
BUT...
Tits covered, callers (mostly) happy = a bunch of mock-indignation at the "false advertising" of it all.
In short... UTTER. BOLLOCKS.
Which brings me to the one argument that actually holds any water.
(31-12-2014 01:36 )Joey 27 Wrote: it's the principle
That's really what it all boils down to, isn't it? It's after 10 pm and Joey wants boobs. Fair enough. We all want what we want. Don't try to dress it up as anything other than that.