Elite TV / Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion

(18-01-2015 20:26 )DeadPanStan Wrote:  

(18-01-2015 03:08 )t-belltosin Wrote:  You know Studio66 is going downhill when they get rid of the likes of Ashley Emma and Paige Green and replace them with girls like Emma Butt.

To be fair they've added a ton more to the station since then. To name a few(if not mistaken)

Kandi Kay, Ella Jolie, Jodie Jones, Roxy, Kerrie Lee, Jessica Kelly, Jade Adele and more even beyond that.

Of that list only Kandi is worth watching

(18-01-2015 20:34 )Broncobilly Wrote:  

(18-01-2015 20:26 )DeadPanStan Wrote:  

(18-01-2015 03:08 )t-belltosin Wrote:  You know Studio66 is going downhill when they get rid of the likes of Ashley Emma and Paige Green and replace them with girls like Emma Butt.

To be fair they've added a ton more to the station since then. To name a few(if not mistaken)

Kandi Kay, Ella Jolie, Jodie Jones, Roxy, Kerrie Lee, Jessica Kelly, Jade Adele and more even beyond that.

Of that list only Kandi is worth watching

I'd say Kandi is 'stay in and cancel everything', but Ella, Jodie/Roxy are definitely watchable. Kerrie's arse is peachy, and I think she'll be taking a career boosting break.. but thats it..

Compared to the selection on other channels with seemingly botched boob jobs, scars etc, S66 ain't that bad..

(18-01-2015 20:26 )DeadPanStan Wrote:  

(18-01-2015 03:08 )t-belltosin Wrote:  You know Studio66 is going downhill when they get rid of the likes of Ashley Emma and Paige Green and replace them with girls like Emma Butt.

To be fair they've added a ton more to the station since then. To name a few(if not mistaken)

Kandi Kay, Ella Jolie, Jodie Jones, Roxy, Kerrie Lee, Jessica Kelly, Jade Adele and more even beyond that.

Amy Rose, Chloe Toy, Jessica Kelly and think Olivia Berzinc too.

(18-01-2015 15:05 )Vic_Smith Wrote:  

(09-01-2015 20:37 )Scottishbloke Wrote:  I think that Studio66 does have the potential to regain its sovereignty, however what's letting it down badly is these arseholes in charge of the production side. Blackouts and any time anything gets remotely compromising up comes the Studio66 Logo.

For as long as this channel remains in the hands of these idiot amateurs then it will only ever get as good as second best to Babestation.

Pretty much. Haven't watched any of the babechannels for a while now but tuned in to S66 on the off chance the other night to see the lovely Sophia on, so watched for a while. Censoring seems even worse now than when I last watched. For instance, why is this unnacceptable?



Nothing poking out that shouldn't be poking out, no close-up and afaik, Ofcom haven't added a 'no laying on back with legs open' rule to the regulations. But this position was all too much for whoever was in charge of the button and we cut to a censor screen a second later. Crap.

Agree with you..... this happens often with Sophia .... I wonder why?? I think either the people "in charge of the button" are friends of her man, or they are told to do so ... but then..... who is in command?

I mean... on the penultimate nightshow of Sophia, she shared screen with Victoria who had a really thin thong that left nothing to imagination showing a little bit of her "second channel".... nothing happened....no logo....

I believe this "logo" comes on... depending on who is that night in charge of the "button room".....there are some...let's say.. more open minded...and others who, i.m.o., have a stronger moral code.... sincerely hope they go quickly out of this business...

I think there's a basic misunderstanding of business policy at the heart of this "problem", and in this case, not much that could be done to change one person's jaded mind.
EDIT - I'm talking about the person complaining about Emma, btw

Quote:Emma would be worth watching if she stripped down to only thong. She seems to wear the same black costume all the time.

Hi Thanks for the feedback i try to match outfits to what time of year and mix it up from there
so far i have done domination outfit once secetary x 2 did a casual outfit in jeans done a gym gear show and a bodystocking
plans for future include nurse,schoolgirl superhero
when the weather gets warmer i will do some babyoil/bikini shows like i did on the other channel i once worked for just dont feel right doing a bikini in middle of winter
as regards to stripping down call me on the show and i will remove whatever you wish naughty boy
love Emma

I love watching Emma no matter what she is wearing but a secretary outfit with a short skirt, stockings & suspenders would really get me off

(18-01-2015 16:29 )mr mystery Wrote:  It seems this new company "Play TV Broadcasting Limited" set up and owned by the owner of STD 66/Primetime UK LTD, and originally discussed with more details given here http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.ph...pid1388802 has been sold/taken over

The latest company info for Play TV Broadcasting LTD shows that Eli Thomas Nathenson the main man behind STD 66/Primetime is no longer connected to the company, nor is Jamie , director info here, http://companycheck.co.uk/company/087756...ecretaries

And share owner info here http://companycheck.co.uk/company/087756...areholders

Also the contact and address details of the Ofcom licence holder of Play TV 2 has changed from the licence details given in Digital Dave's original post, Jamie's name is no longer given in the contact details, nor is STD 66, and the address in now different . http://www.ofcom.org.uk/static/radiolice...laytv2.htm

It seems Muhammad Ali Arif is now one of the men behind the Play TV brand/company these days, and not anyone from STD 66, the share holders are now HUM Networks UK LTD and not anyone from STD 66 either

PS. Play TV 2 only lasted for a short time on Sky channel 940 i believe, it was replaced by Play TV, that channel is licensed to the company's behind STD 66, but it still uses the name of what now seems to be a non related separate company from STD 66/Primetime .

Thanks a lot for this info - all new to me as I hadn't seen any previous references to this.

I think it explains a lot about the changes in s66's attitude, as to what we get onscreen, since the beginning of last year. I think the new regime has definitely brought different ideas to their channels and as a result is moving these shows away from what they were in the past. (Specifics of what I mean, I've posted about before: http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.ph...id=1595495 and http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.ph...id=1596808)

Can't say I think it'll be beneficial to them in their fight against Ofcom though - if that's what they are thinking. (But, come to think of it, I don't think they want to fight Ofcom in any way - even surreptitiously.)

S66 may never get back to where it once was, I'm sorry to say.

This is just my opinion, and I wouldn't want it seen in any other way. But I give varied opinions on all aspects of these shows, one being the babechannel fan and his nocturnal viewing habits. I will never understand why anyone would want to watch through the night some thing that as been done time and time again without any discernible change.

And even more mind-boggling when as last night the two main performers happened to be Clare Richards and Victoria Roberts. Who between them have put in hundreds of hours if not thousands shaking that phone and wearing their tiny black ''trademark'' thongs.

Not saying it's wrong to watch through the night. Just very hard to understand why.

^^^ I agree.

Just an opinion, but sitting and watching a babeshow like it's a tv program is -- to me -- a bit like watching a porno movie from beginning-to-end without ever fast forwarding.

In any given porn scene, I personally only like a few minutes at the start and a couple of minutes at the end. I find the whole repetitive anatomy lesson in between to be extraordinarily tedious.

The babeshows are similar for me. The titillation lasts for about 3 minutes, before the boredom sets in! She will either be sexy enough to prompt me to call (increasingly rare) or I'm on to the next channel and eventually off to bed.