Elite TV / Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion

(21-01-2015 18:23 )mrmann Wrote:  

(20-01-2015 17:50 )RESPONSIBLE ADULT Wrote:  two girls who have never been close to a slip in their entire Babechannel careers. The way they bend and twist those limbs, V.R. in particular but never ever does that pussy come out to see us.
These programmes are meant to tease. These two girls don't. Get shut.

On the contrary, Clare has had multiple slips before, and has even tried to show a bit of full frontal during a few of her sessions last year lol

Victoria won't go nude, so slips are highly rare from her.

Oops, looks like somebody's gotta eat his words

(21-01-2015 17:26 )RESPONSIBLE ADULT Wrote:  

(21-01-2015 15:08 )ShandyHand Wrote:  

(20-01-2015 17:50 )RESPONSIBLE ADULT Wrote:  ...I will never understand why anyone would want to watch through the night some thing that as been done time and time again without any discernible change.

And even more mind-boggling when as last night the two main performers happened to be Clare Richards and Victoria Roberts. Who between them have put in hundreds of hours if not thousands shaking that phone and wearing their tiny black ''trademark'' thongs...

This is an interesting angle Responsible Adult.

There seems to be much less emphasis on 'putting on a show' as a whole these days. The focus is very much on individual callers. (Hence the trend for the girls getting re-dressed between calls.)

This is an understandable attitude from those making the show, as that is obviously where the moneys at, but it does tend to make the shows very stop-start and not allow them to build in anyway. This actively discourages any long-term viewing or, indeed, inspire any brand loyalty or any fan-making for the girls.

My viewing tends to be limited to fast-forwarding through recordings of a few girls that I like, looking for anything that, erm, 'catches my eye'! (Recordings must be an anathema to the channels as they offer very little value to them - other than perhaps possibly contributing to the aforementioned brand loyalty or fan-base building.)

If I am watching live I skip through the streams online looking for anyone or anything that stands out from the ordinary; I'm usually doing other things at the same time. I'll check back if anyone looks promising enough. It's now quite rare for one channel to catch my attention for an extended period.

I would have thought that this is how the majority watch the babe channels. It would be interesting to poll the readers of this forum on how long they view each channel for; along with how this relates to likelihood of calling. I wonder if the channels have any data on these 'conversion rates' - viewers into callers?! That's something that could influence them to do one type of show over another.

As for Clare Richards in particular, I agree. She is a very bland performer IMO. Stunning looking girl, but looks as if she never has any enjoyment in what she does. Everything is, as you say, so routine with some of the regulars. (Although it must be difficult to find variation and look happy with what they have to deal with every night!) The best girls can engage the viewer, at least, and make things look a bit less mechanical at times.

Btw, as you bring up the subject, what is it with Richards and her thongs?! Does she have them specially made to industrial strength? Has she developed muscles previously unknown to the female anatomy? Or does she simply glue them in place? The important bits never move a phucking millimetre from what I can see! It's a scientific anomaly... and a killer for the wood!

I agree with your take on things Shandy, and your view of the tiny thongs that have the ability to block any flash is spot on. You have Clare Richards and Victoria Roberts two girls who introduced these garments and two girls who have never been close to a slip in their entire Babechannel careers. The way they bend and twist those limbs, V.R. in particular but never ever does that pussy come out to see us.
These programmes are meant to tease. These two girls don't. Get shut.

Wtf???! You basically want Victoria Roberts and Clare Richards off the babeshows just because they won't pussyflash???!! If they pussyflashed they'd be out of a job

(21-01-2015 13:37 )Rammyrascal Wrote:   adele and ella did nothing for me last night so rather than watching them last night I watched babes on other channels that did shows that I did like

Sorry to here about this Rammy, hopefully STD 66 and/or Adele and Ella will see your post and do the type of show you do like the next time they are on .
Have you tried calling them ?, if not you could always give them a call and try asking them to do something you do like, i'm sure they will oblige you if you ask nicely, particularly if it stops you from moaning about them on this forum .

(21-01-2015 18:34 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  Wtf???! You basically want Victoria Roberts and Clare Richards off the babeshows just because they won't pussyflash???!! If they pussyflashed they'd be out of a job

If you read what I wrote again Rammy you will see I, quite deliberately, didn't mention anything about flashing. What I'm saying is that CR's 'traditional' underwear is actually particularly 'safe'. It's about the appearance of titillation not the actual flash. If there is no, most likely imaginary, 'danger' there is no titillation or tease. For me, this is an important part of the turn-on.

I think RA is overstating the case a little but I hope that's where he is coming from too. But he can speak for himself I'm sure.

I have to say although last night wasnt exactly ground breaking on S66 two main channels,it certainly wasnt the worst ever,that was the legendary "BLACK WEDNESDAY"but sadly from a performance viewpoint putting Adele and Ella on the same night was perhaps not their best idea as neither of them has put much effort into their performance for some time.in summary neither of last nights babes should appear on their own,both need to appear with stronger performers to mask their apparent lack of enthusiasm which led to such a dull and uneventful show last night.

(21-01-2015 18:23 )mrmann Wrote:  On the contrary, Clare has had multiple slips before, and has even tried to show a bit of full frontal during a few of her sessions last year lol

I remember one vid every poster seemed too scared to post at the time lol

(21-01-2015 18:52 )ShandyHand Wrote:  If you read what I wrote again Rammy you will see I, quite deliberately, didn't mention anything about flashing. What I'm saying is that CR's 'traditional' underwear is actually particularly 'safe'. It's about the appearance of titillation not the actual flash. If there is no, most likely imaginary, 'danger' there is no titillation or tease. For me, this is an important part of the turn-on.

Can I know who has been wearing those unsafe underwear? Must be quite a sight.

(18-01-2015 16:29 )mr mystery Wrote:  ...Also the contact and address details of the Ofcom licence holder of Play TV 2 has changed from the licence details given in Digital Dave's original post, Jamie's name is no longer given in the contact details, nor is STD 66, and the address in now different...

A "Jamie" was still representing s66 in some capacity in October last year: "“Most political parties use the protection-of-minors issue as a sales pitch, drumming up votes, but actually they are doing very little to protect minors. The biggest sites accessed by people in the UK are international. Why doesn’t the government take those sites down? It isn’t the UK industry that has provided the increased access to internet porn. It is international,” Jamie, from Studio 66 TV, says. “We see the benefits of regulation in the industry, but it’s a total mess. You have the UK business suffering from over-regulation. Webcams, television, online, film, all regulated by different regulators, it’s crazy, it’s such a mess. It’s embarrassing. They are not doing anything to protect children. We need to come together as a group, and fight these battles as an industry.”

He asks that his surname shouldn’t be published because: “I have three kids, and not a lot of my kids’ friends know that I do this.

“I think people would perceive me in a different way – you have no respect for women, you must be a philanderer, you must be interested in sex. There is a misconception that women are enslaved by the adult industry,” he says. It turns out that many men in the adult industry are strangely prudish when it comes to Page 3, and the music videos of Beyoncé and Rihanna. “No one wants children to get access to porn. Most of them are parents. Just because you work in the adult industry doesn’t mean you’re not a parent,” he says, but it’s the more freely available content that worries him. “The music business poses much more of a threat to my daughter than the porn industry – Miley Cyrus, with Wrecking Ball.”

Full interesting article here: http://www.theguardian.com/culture/2014/...mentpage=3

Of course i want tease, but not only tease, I want slips and deliberate flashes. And that is where i have to disagree with Shandy. Because if we never ever get a glimpse, and know we will never get a glimpse. then there will be no tease. Thus, It will just be like the ''stick like glue knickers''. Or the dreaded habit of multi-knickers wearing. If purposely denying the viewer something he/she wants to watch, no matter what way it's done. Then the models and the production staff are deceiving all of us who want what they promise, ''adult entertainment''. After all they charge premium rate phone prices. For less than premium entertainment.

(21-01-2015 12:35 )Charlemagne Wrote:  And I was thinking that Adele had one of her better nights. Did you not see that micro black thong.

You guys are 'ard

To be fair I think Adele last night was slightly better than some of her recent shows. At least the thong was tiny and there was a bit of open crotch (neither of which we got from Ella who IMHO just uses Dom to avoid doing anything risque).
I think the problem is that it's all relative (as Einstein when he came on these forums used to say!). Those of us fans of Adele (and previously of Ella in her Sexstation/Babestation days) will remember they both used to put on some really stonking shows (just look back at the great caps and vids people have kindly posted on those threads). It's all the more frustrating (and a bit saddening) for us then when we see their shows getting tamer.