Elite TV / Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion

(01-02-2015 18:42 )ShandyHand Wrote:  I should imagine that if the webstream differed from the TV stream it would come under Ofcom's ATVOD arm these days as it's not behind a paywall and s66 are a UK-based company. Ofcom have them all ways, so the webstream has to be the same as the TV feed.

This is incorrect. ATVOD have no jurisdiction over live broadcasts on the web. They cover video on demand only - that's the VOD in ATVOD.

(01-02-2015 18:42 )ShandyHand Wrote:  Doesn't stop them sticking a second camera in the studio for a web-only angle though I don't think. Any such stream would have to be behind a paywall to placate our friendly neighbourhood quango if it was to show anything stronger than the regular feed.

Not true because Babestation have used a second camera in the past which was very revealing and which wasn't behind a paywall.

(01-02-2015 21:32 )saviour123 Wrote:  Just curious..... how can Babestation transmit Unleashed, without out OFCOM stopping them. It is NOT behind a pay wall?

OFCOM are the TV regulator, not an internet regulator. OFCOM can't stop Babebstation transmittimg Unleashed or anything else online. Perhaps you mean ATVOD? But that doesn't work either because ATVOD only cover video on demand, not live streaming.

(01-02-2015 22:09 )admiral decker Wrote:  

(01-02-2015 18:42 )ShandyHand Wrote:  I should imagine that if the webstream differed from the TV stream it would come under Ofcom's ATVOD arm these days as it's not behind a paywall and s66 are a UK-based company. Ofcom have them all ways, so the webstream has to be the same as the TV feed.

This is incorrect. ATVOD have no jurisdiction over live broadcasts on the web. They cover video on demand only - that's the VOD in ATVOD.

Whoops my bad. Glad to be corrected on this. Can't keep up with all the ins and outs on that side of things.

(01-02-2015 22:12 )bigglesworth Wrote:  

(01-02-2015 18:42 )ShandyHand Wrote:  Doesn't stop them sticking a second camera in the studio for a web-only angle though I don't think. Any such stream would have to be behind a paywall to placate our friendly neighbourhood quango if it was to show anything stronger than the regular feed.

Not true because Babestation have used a second camera in the past which was very revealing and which wasn't behind a paywall.

Thanks for that too. I should never post in haste!

I remember they had another angle for a while. Just at the start of all this regulatory pressure wasn't it? Thought they'd been dissuaded from using it by some pressure from outside. Now I see misremembered that too.

Wonder why they did drop it after all? Did the girls not like it perhaps? No money to be made from it?

The Studio66 tv.com website is a UK website and is ATVOD regulated and is subject to UK ATVOD rules .

Non of the various Babestation websites are UK sites, Game Networks BV a Dutch company own/operate the various BS websites, so they do not come under UK rules . I can't find it now, but there used to be a message on one of the BS sites stating the site came under Dutch regulations .

(02-02-2015 00:10 )mr mystery id='1616772 Wrote:The Studio66 tv.com website is a UK website and is ATVOD regulated and is subject to UK ATVOD rules .

Non of the various Babestation websites are UK sites, Game Networks BV a Dutch company own/operate the various BS websites, so they do not come under UK rules . I can't find it now, but there used to be a message on one of the BS sites stating the site came under Dutch regulations .

Yes the website is ATVOD regulated. Their prerecorded vids are definitely covered. But is the live stream? I'm confused! It applies to still images too. I wouldn't have thought tptb would have missed that trick.

(02-02-2015 00:27 )ShandyHand Wrote:  

(02-02-2015 00:10 )mr mystery id='1616772 Wrote:

Yes the website is ATVOD regulated. Their prerecorded vids are definitely covered. But is the live stream? I'm confused! It applies to still images too. I wouldn't have thought tptb would have missed that trick.

You are not the only one that's confused, it's been puzzling me for some time . The Studio 66 TV.com website that streams the live shows is definitely regulated by ATVOD, (it's on ATVOD's list of regulated sites) but the live streaming doesn't qualify as video on demand, but the site that streams the live shows is regulated by ATVOD .
I would have thought that if STD 66 could stream live free to view harder content via their website that isn't behind a age verified pay wall without getting into trouble, then like BS they would be doing it ? .

(02-02-2015 00:45 )mr mystery Wrote:  I would have thought that if STD 66 could stream live free to view harder content via their website that isn't behind a age verified pay wall then like BS they would be doing it ? .

We're still waiting for the xtreme filth web-only show to come online (since October), could these regulations have something to do with the delay, in that it can't be done via the s66 site, like they may have originally wanted to do.

(01-02-2015 12:26 )circles_o_o_o Wrote:  

(01-02-2015 11:07 )Broncobilly Wrote:  If a girl is pretty and puts in an effort she will get more calls than someone who does not try.

Which is more important, though?
A plain girl putting in the effort -v- a pretty girl being lazy.

if someone like kerrie lee performed as badly as alice goodwin she probably wouldn't be on these babeshows as she looks plain average imo, so she has to put the effort in unlike alice who does fuck all but because she looks hot as fuck she will still bring in the calls

dose where the channels server is based have any bearing on who regulates what, 66 server is in the usa which is also the domain's nationality so this makes 66's web site a American operation don't know if this would affect things in any way,
had a look where the others channels online nationality's are bs are form the small pacific island of Tuvalu, RLC & xpanded both UK