masterfulman
Newbie
Posts: 3
Joined: Sep 2010
Reputation: 0
|
S66 website member
hello,
is it possible to join studio 66 website suscribtion and then watch the cams at home free? or would i still have to pay a rediculous amount? i think hannah martin is 50 tokens (£5) a minute!
|
|
20-05-2015 23:21 |
|
lovebabes56
The No.1 Teddy Bear!!
Posts: 22,420
Joined: Jan 2011
Reputation: 68
|
RE: Studio 66 webcam general chat
(04-04-2015 10:56 )HEX!T Wrote: (04-04-2015 10:39 )DB83 Wrote: ^^ I am aware of copyright law but it is certainly not simple.
simple in essence ??
im perfectly aware of the legal speak and semantics of a contract mate.
Quote:In fact you hit the nail on the head with your remark about 'create'. Yes, it is normally the creator of a work that automatically has the copyright. Which is why I threw the studio in the mix. If they by broadcasting the show are really the creator then it is their copyright and the girl is merely a paid artist. Lawyers make a fortune over such ambiguities.
did you miss the first sentence?. the girls own the final copyright unless the contract states otherwise.
as the creator the girl is directly creating the content there by she own's it. she then signs over the copyright in a contract to the studio/company who then become the "copyright holder" and are able to broadcast it on her behalf.
if either the girl or the company sees a breach in copyright both parties have the right to act.
the girl has the right to ask the copyright holder who would then act on its behalf. if she thinks theres a breach in the company's copyright.
if the copyright holder fails to act, the girl still has options legally to have the content removed because she is still the copyright owner, the company is only the copyright holder.
also im pretty sure failing act and removing copyright content could be seen as a breach of contract for the company and that would likely result in the copyright returning to the girl.
but really thats mute. the point is its copyrighted by somebody other than us.
So basically you are saying that basically before doing anything, we should seek permission from the studio and the girls in question before we start capping and uploading to the forum?
FERRARI & LOVEBABES, - BABE CHANNELS ULTIMATE COUPLE!!
CURRENT BS BABE FAVES :- MIGHTY MIKAELA WITT, DUCHESS DARELLE OLIVER, SULTRY STORMI MACK,
ALL - TIME BABE FAVES:- FERNANDA FERARRI , MELLIE D AND MIKAELA WITT PHOENIX KNIGHT[ DENNI TAYLA, SEXY STEVIE LOUISE
'ALWAYS LOOK ON THE BRIGHT SIDE OF LIFE" - LIFE OF BRIAN
(This post was last modified: 21-05-2015 05:06 by lovebabes56.)
|
|
21-05-2015 05:04 |
|
HEX!T
Retired
Posts: 6,298
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 143
|
RE: Studio 66 webcam general chat
(21-05-2015 05:04 )babelover48 Wrote: (04-04-2015 10:56 )HEX!T Wrote: (04-04-2015 10:39 )DB83 Wrote: ^^ I am aware of copyright law but it is certainly not simple.
simple in essence ??
im perfectly aware of the legal speak and semantics of a contract mate.
Quote:In fact you hit the nail on the head with your remark about 'create'. Yes, it is normally the creator of a work that automatically has the copyright. Which is why I threw the studio in the mix. If they by broadcasting the show are really the creator then it is their copyright and the girl is merely a paid artist. Lawyers make a fortune over such ambiguities.
did you miss the first sentence?. the girls own the final copyright unless the contract states otherwise.
as the creator the girl is directly creating the content there by she own's it. she then signs over the copyright in a contract to the studio/company who then become the "copyright holder" and are able to broadcast it on her behalf.
if either the girl or the company sees a breach in copyright both parties have the right to act.
the girl has the right to ask the copyright holder who would then act on its behalf. if she thinks theres a breach in the company's copyright.
if the copyright holder fails to act, the girl still has options legally to have the content removed because she is still the copyright owner, the company is only the copyright holder.
also im pretty sure failing act and removing copyright content could be seen as a breach of contract for the company and that would likely result in the copyright returning to the girl.
but really thats mute. the point is its copyrighted by somebody other than us.
So basically you are saying that basically before doing anything, we should seek permission from the studio and the girls in question before we start capping and uploading to the forum?
the forum already has done mate. admin sorted it all out as the channels went live is s66's case and got permission from babestation before the forums went live. admin has an ongoing relationship with all the studios and because of this, the forum is allowed to host agreed content with there blessings with a few provisos
if any slips happen then cappers and posters are asked to keep it to themselves unless its purely accidental such as slip of the day.
no ppv vids of bsx shows only caps. and no cam content.
if you look at the top[ of each section you will see a topic labeled copyright notice/please read before posting.
worth a look if you havent already.
(sry about the late reply i forgot abut this )
Any Babe pics posted are my Take on existing photographs. credits for the original images stays with the copyright holder if any rights apply.
Today im wearing a gray hat. tomorrow it might be white or black, it depends on my mood
(This post was last modified: 29-05-2015 04:03 by HEX!T.)
|
|
28-05-2015 13:15 |
|