BabestationX & Live Shows - Chat & Discussion

If you consider a Lori bsx show a treat you must have a different definition of the word than I do.

^ There was an ironical use of the question mark after treat in my post.
Nothing against Lori but there's no point in her doing BSX.

(24-04-2015 16:35 )M-L-L Wrote:  ^ There was an ironical use of the question mark after treat in my post.
Nothing against Lori but there's no point in her doing BSX.

I realised what you where saying but I couldn't resist posting about the absurdity of Lori doing a bsx show.

(24-04-2015 17:43 )Tractor boy Wrote:  

(24-04-2015 16:35 )M-L-L Wrote:  ^ There was an ironical use of the question mark after treat in my post.
Nothing against Lori but there's no point in her doing BSX.

I realised what you where saying but I couldn't resist posting about the absurdity of Lori doing a bsx show.

be fair. using the word 'absurd' when describing Lori on BSX, is way too generous lol

I'm hoping she may jump ship to SinTV and then actually start showing the goods. it might happen lol

Well, the thing is, with the way the other BS channels are going at the moment, BSX shows of babes just doing hand-thongs are going to become the new ultra-explicit level at this rate ?

I think that's what they call " a race to the bottom "

Well if that's the choice I'll race to Preeti's bottom while I still can.

(25-04-2015 11:02 )M-L-L Wrote:   Well if that's the choice I'll race to Preeti's bottom while I still can.

Pace yourself. You don`t want to be exhausted on arrival h

Do they seriously think we are going to pay £8 to see Lori showing less than she shows on the standard babeststion channel?

(25-04-2015 22:16 )JonStone Wrote:  Do they seriously think we are going to pay £8 to see Lori showing less than she shows on the standard babeststion channel?

Some fools actually pay that amount on the normal channels on the phones... so what's the actual difference.... nothing.