Harry Amelia - Chat, Caps & Vids

In reply to Mrmann i think it is kinda different to be fair as doing that video is something she has choose to do and obviously money reasons as well. As for a Camerman doing like whipping his dick out and wanking to me is a different story simply because it wouldn't be very professional for a cameraman to do that as it isn't what the girls have signed up to have to see and i'd only assume there to me are a lot of girls working these channels are far to up there self they would course a drama if it was to happen.

I'm sure a few of the girls would have fucked the camera-men from time to time though probably out of work.

But is it professional to grab the bare asses and breasts of the women on these channels during their sessions? That's happened many times in the past. There has been crotch grinding that still goes on, and another particular moment that I won't mention which further proved that things take place at these studios from time to time, not just outside of work.

If money is the reason for her to do these videos, then what would stop her from allowing this to happen if the producers paid her more or whatever?

The word professional isn't the best word to use, because the producers and crews of these channels make up their own version of what is professional.

You are probably right dude i'm sure there are some Producers or what ever they liked to be called do take advantage of some of girls. Maybe the less prettier ones by offering them some advantages with getting shifts or keeping down the Job.

As for with CamerMen i haven't seen that sort of thing since Donna Duke on Babecast, Faye Rampton on Sport i believe and that is going back a fair few years. Plus AfroMan when i think was like a Domination sort or scene was going on with Caty.

I don't watch the shows as much as i did years ago so have no idea what goes on in that sense nowadays. Plus i don't watch #shitstation nite channel plus Storm.

(07-06-2015 19:39 )mrmann Wrote:  When I see the women doing videos like these, I can't imagine them getting angry if a producer wanks in front of them during a TV session. Now before anyone says that it is completely different, then I ask, what's the difference between her doing videos like these, and her letting a producer wank in front of her while she's on the TV???

What's the difference? I'll tell you the difference, the video is work, it is paid employment, it is a consensual act between the parties involved. Whereas, if a producer/cameraman whips it out, unsolicited, and bangs one out in the studio, that is a sexual offence, plain and simple. It is no different to flashing in a public place, it should be an instant dismissal at the very least, and quite possibly a call to the plod to get the guy arrested.
To suggest that it would be OK because of the nature of what the woman does, or has done, as her paid employment is just plain stupid and fucking disgraceful. Is it OK to rape a prostitute or a porn star because of the nature of their work, they must be up for it because they do it for a living, that's the logical extension of your argument. Fucking ridiculous and typical of the mysoginistic bullshit you have been peddling forever and a day!

(08-06-2015 17:02 )munch1917 Wrote:  

(07-06-2015 19:39 )mrmann Wrote:  When I see the women doing videos like these, I can't imagine them getting angry if a producer wanks in front of them during a TV session. Now before anyone says that it is completely different, then I ask, what's the difference between her doing videos like these, and her letting a producer wank in front of her while she's on the TV???

What's the difference? I'll tell you the difference, the video is work, it is paid employment, it is a consensual act between the parties involved. Whereas, if a producer/cameraman whips it out, unsolicited, and bangs one out in the studio, that is a sexual offence, plain and simple. It is no different to flashing in a public place, it should be an instant dismissal at the very least, and quite possibly a call to the plod to get the guy arrested.
To suggest that it would be OK because of the nature of what the woman does, or has done, as her paid employment is just plain stupid and fucking disgraceful. Is it OK to rape a prostitute or a porn star because of the nature of their work, they must be up for it because they do it for a living, that's the logical extension of your argument. Fucking ridiculous and typical of the mysoginistic bullshit you have been peddling forever and a day!

Thanks white knight. You proved my point. The difference is... MONEY. Also, as you can see in my comment which you've replied to, I said "Letting a producer wank in front of her", which means consensual. I should have worded it differently at the start of my first sentence, as you seem to have only paid attention to that part, but I'm basing this on it being consensual, not with producers just randomly wanking.

Why don't you thank my comment about the producers grabbing bare breasts and smacking bare asses in the past, as well as current crotch grinding, or do you deny that these moments ever happened? Are you afraid that by thanking that post, that people will assume that you agree with everything I say? Don't be so self conscious. I assume you believe that having a wank in front of some of the women if agreed upon would be too far fetched on these channels, despite what many of us know goes on at these studios behind the scenes and sometimes on camera. Of course, you're opinion is the only right one as usual, since you seem to work at all of the studios... I guess you've never seen the effects that alcohol has on the women and producers from time to time... Your rape comment (Rape is a crime BTW, but a woman allowing you to have sex with them or wank near them is not a crime, as it's consensual. It's easy to understand.) is pretty typical of your usual weird accusatory style of writing here. Over the top, dramatic and not in correlation to what I'm comparing.

(08-06-2015 18:56 )mrmann Wrote:  Thanks white knight.

Pathetic.

(08-06-2015 18:56 )mrmann Wrote:  Also, as you can see in my comment which you've replied to, I said "Letting a producer wank in front of her", which means consensual.

I'll quote you again :

(07-06-2015 19:39 )mrmann Wrote:  I can't imagine them getting angry if a producer wanks in front of them during a TV session.

"if a producer wanks in front of them" in no way shape or form does this 'mean consensual'. If you meant something different, you should have said so at the time instead of moving the goalposts now. Likewise your response which you have now re-edited, what 2 or is it 3 times since posting it!

I'll stand by my comments based on what you actually said and leave it there.

^ What I actually said is in your original quote of mine... Key word was "Letting", which means allowing. You only paid attention to my first sentence (I should have worded that better as to not suggest that they'd be OK with them just randomly wanking), then went into your usual huff and began angrily typing. Your reading skills haven't improved I see. I will make sure to word everything very carefully and slowly next time to accommodate your sensitive needs.

Harry being on Big Brother must be like a dream come true for the guys at the Lady Voyeurs site

She's now included on their main page

Sure I saw an interview with her somewhere and she was referring to her wife....