Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion

(16-06-2015 19:29 )Broncobilly Wrote:  The girls read the forums so they should take some of what we say to the production and change things

They might be averse to violence, though

Wouldn't say Keisha Kane & Karina Currie are 3rd rate porn stars myself. I think they are top rate porn stars that would make other channels wish they were on their channels as they have lots of fans who will watch & call them and that's what channels want

(16-06-2015 19:29 )Broncobilly Wrote:  The girls read the forums so they should take some of what we say to the production and change things

As long as they are getting well paid i doubt they care about the production tbh, they won't get paid as well if they go on the x stream because hardly any one will call them regardless of what kind of show they put on, people seem to think the girls will bring in the calls if they are always on the x stream but they will never get as many calls as they will on the sky channel, because causal callers won't bother looking for the x stream, you could have Ella Jolie and Bex Shiner doing a Dom show together on Sky and they will still get more calls than a naked 2-4-1 between Ella Mai and Ree Petra on the x stream

^Scary thought but probably true

(15-06-2015 15:32 )babelover48 Wrote:  I just wonder sometimes if the girls are plonked on the X - streams with the following instructions :-
"just fucking bore the viewers to death don't do anything remotely exciting!"
FFS!! lighten up sin TV, you are fucking adult channel and ffs do something worthy of an adult channel please!!
If you are not going to be exciting then you are not going to get any calls!!

Desperation and all round lack of belief in what they are doing on the xstreams is not conducive to putting out sexy shows is it?! IMO that's what we are seeing on there atm - a total lack of faith in the xstreams ability to bring in calls in any volume. As Joey has said, Sins' better regarded, more established, babes are now even using their clout to avoid appearing on there too often it would seem.

...Even if a girl on the xstream can manage to look sexy whilst pining for a call, she probably only has the eyes of a scant few hundred people that somehow managed to randomly catch the session..! How many of those are likely to call do you think?!

Maybe Sin, you should try something radical you know... like, erm, you know, maybe telling babe show fans when the sessions are going to be on, whom they will be featuring, and for how long! And please stick to it! Short sessions will do a first (20 minutes say) and tell the girls to do as much as they can to build the audience for their second, third, or tenth such session. They need not to worry about getting calls early on (because they obviously aren't going to). But with consistency and regularity the audience and callers will build.

That said, I also wonder if Sin do have comprehensive "viewing figures" for their webstreams at all as yet? You would hope they have enough info by now to see which shows went better than others in terms of page hits as well as calls. I'd want someone there building from stuff like that. (It doesn't look like anyone is planning a coherent strategy from that kind of data from the randomness we see on our monitors atm.) Hopefully, the small improvements made to their website and on their email communications recently are a truer indication of a better direction ahead.

I'm still hopeful this channel may still pull it out the bag at some point in the future (that's if they are really learning on the job)... but its definitely a little forlorn hope right now.

Edited for mangling typo!

(16-06-2015 19:54 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  Wouldn't say Keisha Kane & Karina Currie are 3rd rate porn stars myself. I think they are top rate porn stars that would make other channels wish they were on their channels as they have lots of fans who will watch & call them and that's what channels want

Rammy why do you always support all of the girls ?
If Miss Piggy was on the babeshows with Kermit the frog you would support her
Keisha & Karina are certainly not top rated porn stars. I don`t want to watch their porn. If they were top rated porn stars then Brazzers or one of the other top porn producers would have signed them up
I don`t think that Keisha has been on a babeshow channel since she left Bang Babes before they closed down but I my be wrong

(16-06-2015 22:00 )ShandyHand Wrote:  snip

We keep hoping for an improvement, has anyone seen signs to give hope to this ?

(16-06-2015 22:42 )TURNIPHEAD Wrote:  

(16-06-2015 19:54 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  Wouldn't say Keisha Kane & Karina Currie are 3rd rate porn stars myself. I think they are top rate porn stars that would make other channels wish they were on their channels as they have lots of fans who will watch & call them and that's what channels want

Rammy why do you always support all of the girls ?
If Miss Piggy was on the babeshows with Kermit the frog you would support her
Keisha & Karina are certainly not top rated porn stars. I don`t want to watch their porn. If they were top rated porn stars then Brazzers or one of the other top porn producers would have signed them up
I don`t think that Keisha has been on a babeshow channel since she left Bang Babes before they closed down but I my be wrong

Keisha did a few stints on RLC summer of 2013 - some excellent shows. I know she isn't your taste but she is dirty, and knows how to pose.

As for tonight's line up, to call them 3rd rate would be flattery...

(16-06-2015 22:51 )Broncobilly Wrote:  We keep hoping for an improvement, has anyone seen signs to give hope to this ?

For me, not from what I've seen on-screen recently, no.

The only hope comes from how they set up and presented their output on-screen initially (up to their first couple weeks on Sky). I would like to think they still have plans to move back to that style when they can. Whether they will be able to is another question.

(16-06-2015 23:02 )ShandyHand Wrote:  

(16-06-2015 22:51 )Broncobilly Wrote:  We keep hoping for an improvement, has anyone seen signs to give hope to this ?

For me, not from what I've seen on-screen recently, no.

The only hope comes from how they set up and presented their output on-screen initially (up to their first couple weeks on Sky). I would like to think they still have plans to move back to that style when they can. Whether they will be able to is another question.

There is no reason why they can't go back unless they are stuck in a rut and no one has the motivation to change