Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion

^ Only reason not to, and the one I was hinting at, would be financial. They may never get past the constraint of having to have multiple babes on their TV channel at one time in order to bring in enough revenue to cover their overheads. There doesn't appear to be a bottomless pit of backing from what we can see atm.

For the third night running Sin Tv has been utter crap
I have switched channels to watch Candy Sexton on babestation

(16-06-2015 22:57 )TURNIPHEAD Wrote:  For the third night running Sin Tv has been utter crap

Its been crap since night one,a truely shit channel.The regular 341 and 241 shows are completely lifeless with the same old shit camera angles for solo shows!!

(16-06-2015 22:44 )ShandyHand Wrote:  ^ Only reason not to, and the one I was hinting at, would be financial. They may never get past the constraint of having to have multiple babes on their TV channel at one time in order to bring in enough revenue to cover their overheads. There doesn't appear to be a bottomless pit of backing from what we can see atm.

Perhaps they have data that show the 3 girl thing is working?

(17-06-2015 05:27 )Broncobilly Wrote:  

(16-06-2015 22:44 )ShandyHand Wrote:  ^ Only reason not to, and the one I was hinting at, would be financial. They may never get past the constraint of having to have multiple babes on their TV channel at one time in order to bring in enough revenue to cover their overheads. There doesn't appear to be a bottomless pit of backing from what we can see atm.

Perhaps they have data that show the 3 girl thing is working?

I cannot believe these people use data of any kind because if they did, they would be experimenting with different formats over a prolonged period to ascertain the best formula

(17-06-2015 05:27 )Broncobilly Wrote:  

(16-06-2015 22:44 )ShandyHand Wrote:  ^ Only reason not to, and the one I was hinting at, would be financial. They may never get past the constraint of having to have multiple babes on their TV channel at one time in order to bring in enough revenue to cover their overheads. There doesn't appear to be a bottomless pit of backing from what we can see atm.

Perhaps they have data that show the 3 girl thing is working?

Oh no doubt it is working. (In terms of making money for them.) It seems to suit Sin for now and they seem reasonably happy with what they are doing on TV atm. But is it what they wanted to be doing at this stage? That would seem unlikely because there must be a reason why they saw the single girl model as more desirable early on.

I'd speculate that the three girl thing is not popular with some babes. And has been at least a partial reason for some of the departures.

Would Sin be doing 3-on-1's if the streams were more successful or if they had a second TV channel? I doubt it.

To be fair to them. Ree Petra is on the x-stream and no one is calling. But then you have to sign up to the website to see it.

^All part of Sin TV's cunning plan to prevent anyone ringing their performers.

(17-06-2015 20:30 )RutgerWhore Wrote:  To be fair to them. Ree Petra is on the x-stream and no one is calling. But then you have to sign up to the website to see it.

But it is free to sign up to the website

Wild west night on SINTV the good the bad and the ugly