Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion

(27-06-2015 12:33 )The Silent Majority Wrote:  

(27-06-2015 10:16 )zerowow Wrote:  ^ the "safe for work" one, fine with restricted shows, who call to chat; to whom these shows pander.

Yeah, pander to the customer, that's no way to run a business

Not sure what you were expecting, though. Or was it a tease hour?

It's related to a discussion we were having about the cause of the decline, and my central point was that the audience has changed as the rules have changed, this 'new' one being the one the channels focus on, so to argue for improved performances from the girls was to miss the point.

One sign that I am truly downhearted with the shows is that in all but one case, of those babes that are currently active I no longer care who is scheduled to be on any channel on any given night.
I expect the output to be rubbish anyway.
I expect endless sitting on desks, lying on beds, waving of phones and stints on mic to complain at lack of callers.
I expect gormless facial expressions, zero sexual stimulation, zero imagination and little or no movement.

And all of my expectations are met and often exceeded.
All my faith is gone.
All my optimism is gone.
All my hope is gone.
All the channels are failing.

The nightshows are the palest of pale shadows of what they used to be.
And the lone consoling voice in my head can offer only these positive words...............
'Think of the sleep you will get'.

Sad times .

*snookered slumps back into his armchair and reflects on glories past

^ Worried about you Snookered. I wonder if a few nights break from watching might at least give your broken heart time to heal (The shows won't be any better though!)

^ Well tonight I will be watching England play Canada in the quarter finals of the World Cup so that will give me some respite at least .

(27-06-2015 13:27 )zerowow Wrote:  

(27-06-2015 12:33 )The Silent Majority Wrote:  

(27-06-2015 10:16 )zerowow Wrote:  ^ the "safe for work" one, fine with restricted shows, who call to chat; to whom these shows pander.

Yeah, pander to the customer, that's no way to run a business

Not sure what you were expecting, though. Or was it a tease hour?

It's related to a discussion we were having about the cause of the decline, and my central point was that the audience has changed as the rules have changed, this 'new' one being the one the channels focus on, so to argue for improved performances from the girls was to miss the point.

Yes, but I don't really see your point about calling Lucy-Anne.

You called a Daytime girl, on a Daytime show, and were annoyed that the caller in front of you only wanted to chat?
I think you'll find that was always the case for a very large percentage of daytime callers.

What is the point of the day shows you can't have a dirty call and the babes seem to lie down all the time. Don't see the point of the tease shows.

From what some people have said here I don't think the babeshows should need to compete with online porn. If I wanted to watch hardcore porn I would but to be honest it doesn't really appeal to me these days. I would much rather watch a high quality girl that I really fancy wearing some revealing clothing, doing a bit of a tease on tv.

The appeal of the babeshows is seeing high quality girls you wouldn't usually find doing porn wearing revealing outfits etc. You can't really find anything like it online that is why it is appealing, I have no interest in hard core stuff, I don't even really want to see girls naked on cam, there is something appealing about not being able to see everything.

If the babeshows went back to how they were a few years back I would be happy.

But since then most of the really attractive girls have left, with not many new ones to replace them. Night shows have got a lot tamer and it even seems to be effecting the dayshows with girls wearing less revealing outfits and not showing as much cleavage even.

Compare Teejay and Cara Steel shows from this year to 2013 and you will see what I mean.

sorry mate you just baffled me.
no high quality girls in porn? depends what you watch...
im a big fan of met art and the girls on there would shame most of the girls on the channels as far as looks go.
http://www.stunning18.com/model/foxy-salt/ 19 and would give ella jolie a run for her money looks wise when ella was that young.
theres also alsangels
ftvgirls and wow girls many more that carry a full lineup of stunners. if all you want is a striptease and maybe a little more.
oh and foxy salt/katy can entertain you on MFC (passi0ngirl), she doesnt cost a bomb and goes much much further than any of the current so called premium talent on the likes of babestation.


nah mate the only thing the babeshow girls have going for them is you can pick up the phone and chat to them.
for the most part the girls on our screens aint that attractive. some make up for it with skills on the phone but most of them as as fake as there tits.

Well Faye Rampton and Wendy Taylor are putting on a show lots of touching and trying not to be naughty with each other. They are showing that if you let the babes do their thing and not put the logo up every time they do something rude. Would Babestation or Sin have them on together.

Sintv would I think as they would put them on the xstream where basically anything goes