Rammyrascal
Team Thicc
Posts: 102,594
Joined: Apr 2009
Reputation: 250
|
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion
a member of the Piper Niven Cult
(This post was last modified: 19-07-2015 19:44 by Rammyrascal.)
|
|
19-07-2015 19:44 |
|
admiral decker
Seeker of truth and justice
Posts: 1,582
Joined: Nov 2008
Reputation: 83
|
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion
(19-07-2015 10:55 )Pixel Wrote: I'm wondering whether these promises to pay people are just a way to fob them off and deflect legal action until they can liquidate the company? Once the company is gone then creditors have nothing to claim money from. That's what any failing company would do and is the main reason limited liability companies are set up.
Looking on the bright side, perhaps they are attempting to pay people in order to salvage their credibility and start again. However, as Elgar said, this will be a substantial sum. I can't think of another reason why they would be genuinely attempting to pay creditors, when the alternative is to dissolve the company and disappear into the night. Therefore I remain deeply sceptical.
This is an interesting post by Pixel. I must admit I've been wondering too if the promises to pay everyone might turn out to be empty promises.
Loaded Magazine is a recent example of the kind of liquidation Pixel is speaking of. After the Loaded TV fiasco built up a lot of debt, the Loaded publishing company was suddenly liquidated. Those going without pay wondered why the magazine was still being published, but another company had been formed so they could carry on with the magazine as though nothing had happened. In this case, the liquidated company was genuinely insolvent though, which is an important point.
Yes, perhaps they are attempting to pay people in order to salvage their credibility and start again. That's certainly possible. But there is another reason why they would be genuinely attempting to pay creditors, which is that perhaps the company is not insolvent at this time. Although they are clearly in a bad way financially, perhaps they are not actually insolvent yet. I mean if they have monies due to them which could be used to pay their debtors, then liquidating the company now could make the directors personally liable for the company's debts.
The principle of limited liability only works to protect directors from being responsible for debts if all the rules of running a limited liability company are followed, and this includes not liquidating the company before doing everything possible to pay its debts. A wrongful liquidation, leaving people unpaid who really could have been paid, would only make the directors personally liable for those same debts.
|
|
19-07-2015 19:53 |
|
Goodfella3041
Posting Machine
Posts: 1,684
Joined: Feb 2011
Reputation: 61
|
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion
I just read the last few pages of posts and a horrifying thought came to me...
Sin TV sounds to me like something that would happen if a bunch of us disgruntled Forum members -- dissatisfied with the current state of the babeshows -- said, "F**k it! We can do a better job than them!" ... and started our own Babe Channel.
It has all the hallmarks of someone thinking that everyone else is stoopid and trying to be too cute. "Hotter girls! Better sets! What could possibly go wrong???"
Too many well-intentioned innovations, too quickly ... before slipping on the painfully obvious banana skin that a more experienced operator knows how to avoid.
It's a cautionary tale. I withdraw my investment. You guys are on your own...!
(This post was last modified: 19-07-2015 21:31 by Goodfella3041.)
|
|
19-07-2015 21:31 |
|