Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion

^ Absolutely agree. In addition any supplier would do credit checks on both the company trying to buy services from them and also the key personnel so any idea they might have about coming back under another name are remote as well. On a wider note such a failure also impacts on the sector as well and makes it more difficult for anyone else to start up.

So I see Sin TV have finally realised that they are over and shut up shop. Channel 942 has now gone from my Sky guide. About time this happend. Sad to see another channel go but for Sin it was their stupid fucked up mistakes that have caused their own down fall.

This channel had the potential to become the No1 channel and beat their rivals, with top babes and great sets. However they did not pay the babes. People blamed the babes cause of their attitude of being drama queens but however it was Sin that fucked up really bad so bad that every babe left. So for that Sin Fuck Off and good riddance.

So funny

I mean, yes it's unfortunate that they couldn't last any longer, but bloody hell, how long were they on for, three months???

Maybe the producers just wanted easy sex and quick cash, and didn't intend to stay on for longer?

(20-07-2015 23:46 )mrmann Wrote:  Maybe the producers just wanted easy sex

Here we go with more of this nonsense,Why scottishbloke and not you eh?

(21-07-2015 00:15 )general drago Wrote:  

(20-07-2015 23:46 )mrmann Wrote:  Maybe the producers just wanted easy sex

Here we go with more of this nonsense,Why scottishbloke and not you eh?

Sex is natural and happens at these studios on a regular basis. My guess is that the producers of Sin wanted to shag a number of the women there, while making some money as well. However, things didn't work out as they had hoped, and they started losing money and planning things poorly.

Yes, claiming that some of the producers likely want to shag some of the women on these channels is nonsense...

You need to stop being so naive

(20-07-2015 22:59 )REX MASTER Wrote:  This channel had the potential to become the No1 channel and beat their rivals, with top babes and great sets.

I disagree. As I posted before, their entire business plan was fundamentally flawed and economically unsustainable from day one, so it was never ever going to succeed in it's original form, so it never had the potential to be best, it only ever had the potential to fail.

What they started out with was just a fantasy channel that soon fizzled away as the start-up capital was spent. The 'real' SinTV was the one they ended up with, the one that was trying to run within it's own economy, with one tv channel, one stream, and only a handful of girls. That was hardly the No1 channel!

I don't know why people are still claiming that this channel could have been good. Thanks to munch for his explanation above that this was not the case, although I actually said before the channel even began broadcasting that it's hard to see how it could ever succeed. As I commented at the time, they didn't have a viable business plan and before very long would inevitably find themselves under severe financial pressure. People shouldn't try and create and/or perpetuate a myth that they had any real chance of succeeding.

Of course it could have been good. Any business has the potential to be good. It is just how you go about it that matters.

The astute business-man will go from bottom up ie start small. A good example of this is Iceland (the company not the country) which started with one small shop and a couple of freezers. Sin tried to buck the trend and start from the top with all those streams, high-paid girls, expenses studio etc. The top down approach can only work with a huge working capital and it has now been shown they simply did not have that.

If they do come back in September then I expect to see a 'stripped-down' (pardon the obvious pun) version and a more credible business approach. My hopes are not well founded.

^How well would they be received though. They've already alienated a fair portion of their customer base and pissed off the babes they might have working for them.

What posters are praising as the 'potential' of Sin are basically some format ideas that the existing channels should have taken up long ago, if they weren't so tight-fisted at speculating to accumulate, and so bunkered in their mentalities. Things like more expansive interactive sets, HD streams (problematic yes but hardly unachievable these days), larger use of web-only streams, second camera angle options (both since taken up and, in some ways, improved on elsewhere), bigger social media presence. 

These ideas are not negated in any way by the fact that they were instigated on the back of an unsustainable financial model as regards personnel.

A myth would also be perpetuated by suggesting that Sin could not have been turned around even following it's overly extravegant beginnings. It was it's bosses' intransigence that was the root of Sin's downfall not its innovations.

To deny any of these things smacks of a preference for the status quo and pre-existing agenda against the channel to my mind.