(08-09-2015 10:03 )mrmann Wrote: Right, because all of the babe channels were started by gay men...
I don't think for one minute that the channels were started by gay men. It is more reasonable to assume that the channels were started by people who saw the financial earnings potential of women making themselves available for interactive sexual fantasy via the phones and TV. Where homsexuality/misogyny/aversion to women plays its part, is entirely to do with the
suppression of this material. Ofcom are currently the governing body that regulates this material. They enforce obedience to rules that suppress what can be publicly transmitted... There is no doubting the moral concern that members of the public have about the transmission of material that is likely to offend or corrupt (sexual or otherwise). Therefore the regulation of such material is indeed necessary....
However, regulating this material out of moral concern, and regulating this material out of fear/sexual insecurity/aversion to women/misogyny, are indeed very different motivations... I am convinced that the level of suppression we are observing coming from these babe channels is entirely due to fear and misogyny - and nothing whatsoever to do with morality. Morality is just the veneer that these sexual deviants in politics/government are utilizing to suppress what they loathe and fear... What the hell do men who have sex with other men, or men who sexually molest children, or men who engage in other deviant sexual practices care about morality in matters of sex? Politics and government is rife with such individuals.
As for the producers and cameramen who direct these shows....
The producers would not have succumbed to Ofcom's new classification when this classification actually negates the very license for which they applied and are paying for. How can shows that are all about sex, agree to be classified as adverts; when they have to be bound by the very same rules as these adverts. These rules straight away
discriminate against sex: because you are required to follow codes of decency when advertising. The very nature of these shows are indecent (according to Western social customs). So what is the point of paying for a license to broadcast sex, when the new rules themselves discriminate against sex. That is why these day shows are now terrified if women's underwear so much as comes on display. It is an absolute joke!!
The entire system seems to me to be run by men who loathe women; and the majority of these producers seem to fall into that category.