Censorship :-(
Sadly, no more caps. :-(
Posts: 5,362
Joined: May 2009
Reputation: 52
|
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion
|
|
12-09-2015 21:33 |
|
ShandyHand
No Paywall Onlys - not babeshows
Posts: 3,988
Joined: Mar 2009
Reputation: 65
|
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion
Despair for the night shows seems more prevalent than ever round here atm doesn't it? (It's certainly why I've lessened my posting of late. What more is there to say about how bad these shows have become these days?!)
Indeed, some of this post has, no doubt, been said in this very thread before, but I think it bears repeating as the specifics of the situation are presented in so stark relief right now...
66 Days - Ronseal (does what it says on the tin).
Nights - non-Ronseal!
It can only be, really, alternate personnel that can be blamed for the difference in attitude and outlook that this situation speaks to. (Whether the individual viewer lays the blame for it more on the back-room staff or more on the babes side would depend, I imagine, on how generally sympathetic the individual is towards babe or babes.)
For me, the whole "second-cam" thing perfectly exemplifies the difference in approach of the two camps at 66:
Days - A general willingness to persist at a new format with a sense of fun, cheekiness, titillation and an effort to DO MORE (i.e. shock - work a little harder!) to appeal to different types of consumer at the same moment in time...
Yes, some girls show and do more than others but between them they cover most of the bases.
Nights - A couple of incredibly half-hearted token sessions with the camera often in the wrong place (or someone there has a very strange idea of what voyeurism is!)*... Altogether, a concept seemingly forced back into their agenda by its success on days and implemented with all the enthusiasm of a wet fart in white trousers!
Instead, we have a dogged persistence with the tease format. A type of show which (perhaps not co-incidentally) all too often resolves back to showing and DOING LESS (from both girl and cameraman**). It's efforts to ape the wrong aspects of a day show and appeal to a certain type of specialist caller are problematical, as evidenced on this forum, due to it's EXCLUSION of others.
Babeshows should be all about the encouragement of participation from the viewer. As can be seen from this thread, nightshows atm, often have the exact opposite effect on previously loyal customers.
From the outside, it does seem truly bizarre that the heads of 66 seem totally unable to get a handle on these disparities.
* I realise there are practical difficulties with implementing a second cam on nights as opposed to days but still...
** Not saying the buck stops there... I'm prepared to give the often abused babeshow cameraman the benefit of the doubt - I think it's probably a case of being told, quite specifically, when and how to work from above.
Babeshow n. - Live Adult Entertainment genre based around premium-rate phome sex chat lines. Scantily-clad female presenter induces callers and users to other inactive services from three-walled set in a TV studio. Largely softcore Tease format influenced by standards and strictures of free-to-air TV platform..
|
|
13-09-2015 10:01 |
|